[quote]guhkes wrote:
[quote]SamMcLoughin wrote:
[quote]guhkes wrote:
[quote]SamMcLoughin wrote:
[quote]Hallowed wrote:
I know NOTHING about this training method… but like your log name.[/quote]
Thanks, if I had to liken it to something, I’d say it’s a mix between 5/3/1 (which I’ve also done and had success with) and linear periodization. There’s 12 weeks in a cycle, but I’ve taken out the deload, so it only takes me 9 weeks, broken down into three waves: accumulation, which is basically a high volume week, intensification, which is a more intense week, with 60% of the volume of the previous week, and realisation, which has just one top set, but it’s all out. The waves are 10, 8, 5 and 3, meaning that your work sets should be for 10, 8, 5, or 3 reps, more if you can.
Bit long winded, but that’s the best way I can describe it.
[/quote]
This is modified Juggernaut method, isn’t it? I see you have good results with it. Hope I can do the same.
Solid work bro.[/quote]
What do you mean by modified? All the percentages are from the book and pretty much anything I’ve done here is in the book except backdown sets and my recent changes to lower body assistance.
Good luck with it, do you have a log?
[/quote]
By modified I mean that normally one cycle is 16 weeks with the deload weeks (well at least that’s my understanding after reading the book and looking the spreadseet). If you skip deloads, you get to 12 weeks (modified already) and if you squeeze it to 9 weeks as you wrote before, it seems even more modified. And since I didn’t see you name the program in your post, I thought you got it from someone not knowin what it was or just bent it to your needs. And that left me wondering whether it really was TJM or something very similar.
[/quote]
Oh yeah, forgot I cut out the deload, if I wrote that I’m squeezing it to 9 weeks then I was wrong, I meant twelve, all I’ve done is cut out the deloads.