Trump has been rooting for, fomenting and gaslighting the rioting for a couple months now. He realized it was his only chance at reelection. I assure you he wants the rioting to continue. That’s not new at all.
FFS when the PDX riot was starting to die down in late June he very publicly sent in DHS to fire up the rioters.
One other thought (and something to pose to the group).
If Trump wins (which I think is likely)…do you think the DEMS with “get it”…or will they do like Hillary in 2016 and blame anything and everything on the loss except for the person looking at them in the mirror?
Violent riots. Denounce them frequently and vigorously. This isn’t difficult. And the rest of the enabling silence is compliance BLM? Go do some actual good in violent neighborhoods.
Agreed. And I’m pretty shocked to be honest; I find the riots despicable on their own, but I didn’t think they’d last as long as they have and I am also astounded at how badly the Democrats misplayed their hand here.
Poor analogy. Fans on both sides of the issue have voiced their opinions as have Native American groups. BLM remains silent.
I never said that. I acknowledged your belief and stated why I disagree. I thought you could digest these things.
This is about silence, not what one believes. And keep in mind who is pushing the silence is complicity line. Keep in mind which side is pushing inflexible dogma
I’m calling them on their hypocrisy.
Only the heterosexual males.
The indoctrination will take care of that (and there is actual indoctrination going on for teachers).
“What gave them the right to think that my son was an animal?”
How about his criminal record? This might sound insensitive, but I would like to ask this father why he failed to raise a son who wasn’t a violent criminal that liked to abuse women.
They will blame frightened racist whites.
Which is how they become useful idiots.
We’ve seen this movie before. The Dems come in with a large lead and act like they’re entitled to it.
The also act like opposition to them is racist, misogynist, homophobic etc. That’s a losing strategy in any election and this is their second time running this play.
Are we all ready for the second ‘fuck you, buddy’ election?
Edit: I’d have thought this was obvious by now, but the goal of politics is to expand the group of people willing to vote for you, and shame is a piss poor mechanism for that. The DNC pay an army of consultants yet they can’t grasp that fact.
How tin eared can you be that you only act like you care about burnt store fronts when it shows up in your internal polling?
Romney made that mistake with his 47% comment.
Precisely.
Because that’s what insurance is for.
My Mrs works in insurance and her head explodes reading stuff like this.
Exclusionary clauses are a common feature for political unrest, not that the dimwits writing drek like this grasp that fact.
Some of these businesses had stopped paying insurance because they weren’t open due to Covid.
And correct me if I’m wrong, but I have a deductible for my health, home and auto insurance; would it not be the same for these businesses?
I’ve asked her, the deductible is usually higher for areas that are higher risk, but there are other major factors at play.
They might get material damage (as there is a US terrorism fund) but potentially no coverage for business interruption.
Also, there could be really stringent security conditions for theft (did they have an alarm, was it unoccupied etc) in order to receive anything at all.
She also added that the companies will be looking for anything to escape paying for damage this widespread, and that will be microscopic focus on every escape clause. Otherwise, they might end up insolvent as a result of this.
Also, claims make premiums rise, and it makes moving insurer harder. They’ve made it much harder for any business that even gets claims, and with more stringent conditions.
So Marxists are, shockingly, wrong about relying on insurance to cover damage caused by their disorder.
Well, they are supposed to be fighting for the working class, even though they hate the working class, but if we truly have a communist revolution they will become part of that working class they hate so much. I don’t think they get that part. I’ve read, I’m not sure of how truthful it is, that in the USSR it was illegal to not work because unemployment could not exist under communism.
My father worked in Romania and knew a former ice cream salesman under the previous regime who had to deliver ice cream 7 days a week and the ice cream supplies lasted for one day a week.
Obviously not the DEMS.
What’s the saying…“Snatching defeat from the hands of victory?”