Comparison pictures of The Hulk, original film(Shrek), Incredible Hulk(in contest shape), and The Avengers(off season shape?) I think he looked sort of like the 60’s-80’s Hulk squareish.[/quote]
Oh wow, I like the new look.
This Hulk looks more…human…
And damn @ the second pic… the traps, front and rear delt, tris and bis… hot.
Maybe I’ll go see this movie after all.
[/quote]
Yeah they’re saying they used Ruffalo as the design in the face of the current Hulk, Incredible Hulk does look like he just walked off the stage at The Olympia[/quote]
I think (though some on T Nation may call it blasphemy) that a Hulk that is too ripped looks weaker than either the Avengers Hulk or the Ang Le Hulk, who are smoother yet have a stronger look to me.[/quote]
I feel the leaner look from the most recent movie elicits a deeper ferocity. The avengers hulk brings to mind the more controlled hulk.[/quote]
Agree. He looked a lot meaner too. AvengHulk’s face just looks ugly as hell, and the shoulder picture of him doesn’t look right. His shoulder is huge while his arm is kind of small coming down from the shoulder. Doesn’t look right.[/quote]
I think the look is more old school how he looked in the 90’s-80’s square shaped more a brute than a bodybuilder. I like it and I can’t wait for the movie
[quote]kevinm1 wrote:
I think the look is more old school how he looked in the 90’s-80’s square shaped more a brute than a bodybuilder. I like it and I can’t wait for the movie[/quote]
I think the picture you posted looks fine. My comment was more along the lines about a specific CGI shot where his shoulder looks about twice as big as the arm that’s hanging off of it. But Corstijeir may be right and it may just be a bad pre release shot and fixed in the final edit of the movie.
It looks like more movie than game…but honestly, I was just thinking the other day that our concept of movies is nearly dead.
Think about it…they are now so out of ideas they are redoing movies only 10 years old or so.
in 50 years, I seriously doubt “movies” will be the hottest thing. I am sure things like this will eventually take over…interactive “game movies” with added sensory perception like smells and tactile sensation.
However, for only 6 hours of game play…that may not be worth it just yet.
It looks like more movie than game…but honestly, I was just thinking the other day that our concept of movies is nearly dead.
Think about it…they are now so out of ideas they are redoing movies only 10 years old or so.
in 50 years, I seriously doubt “movies” will be the hottest thing. I am sure things like this will eventually take over…interactive “game movies” with added sensory perception like smells and tactile sensation.
However, for only 6 hours of game play…that may not be worth it just yet.[/quote]
Exactly what I was thinking and why I posted it.
I am more of an anime and Japanese film guy then Comic book (I blame Kung Fu theater from back in the day) and I am interested in this concept. A normal movie goes for what 20 bucks for 2 hours on average, so 60 bucks for 6 hours is what they are equating it to.
I will probably have a weak moment and end up buying this. But will be very interesting to see.
Next DC animated project Superman vs The Elite, based on the story “What’s wrong eith truth justice and the American way?” now my question is since DC has spent so much money with their new 52 line and changing Superman’s costume why is he still in his traditional outfit for this cartoon?
