Gee Who Would Have Guessed

[quote]smh_23 wrote:

[quote]zecarlo wrote:

[quote]smh_23 wrote:
Better schools is the big one. Better schools and much longer school days.[/quote]
That’s backwards. Better families, neighborhoods, communities, etc., naturally produce better schools. A better way to say it would be different schools. Schools that take it upon themselves to include teaching what is lacking in the kids’ environments. That would be consequences, morals, empathy, PROPER GRAMMAR!!!, manners, civility, self-respect (vs pride), etc.
[/quote]

Right–better schools, in other words. And perfectly doable. Can you erase what’s done at home? No. But if you balance it better, more kids are going to end up toppling in your direction. To think this impossible is ridiculous.

Edit: And of course better families produce better schools. But guess what? Better schools also produce better families. You spend your time thinking of a feasible set of ways to force Mom to be a good parent, I’ll spend my time thinking of ways to make school tougher and more effective, and we’ll see who comes up with what.[/quote]

so better schools would possibly change things for the better. Yet, I just read an article recently about Chicago closing many schools in the poor neighborhoods. Is this being done by design or what?

“Twelve thousand Chicago children are walking new, often longer, routes to school this fallâ??after Mayor Rahm Emanuel closed 47 schools, almost all in poor Black and Latino neighborhoods. - See more at: In Chicago and Philadelphia, Closing Schools and Funding Charters | Labor Notes

[quote]smh_23 wrote:

[quote]zecarlo wrote:

[quote]smh_23 wrote:
Better schools is the big one. Better schools and much longer school days.[/quote]
That’s backwards. Better families, neighborhoods, communities, etc., naturally produce better schools. A better way to say it would be different schools. Schools that take it upon themselves to include teaching what is lacking in the kids’ environments. That would be consequences, morals, empathy, PROPER GRAMMAR!!!, manners, civility, self-respect (vs pride), etc.
[/quote]

Right–better schools, in other words. And perfectly doable. Can you erase what’s done at home? No. But if you balance it better, more kids are going to end up toppling in your direction. To think this impossible is ridiculous.

Edit: And of course better families produce better schools. But guess what? Better schools also produce better families. You spend your time thinking of a feasible set of ways to force Mom to be a good parent, I’ll spend my time thinking of ways to make school tougher and more effective, and we’ll see who comes up with what.[/quote]
Not better, different. Well, since I actually worked in inner city schools and lived in an inner city I think I just might have the advantage in this. Don’t underestimate the environment. It’s not about making the schools tougher but creating a certain culture within the school but, that culture will be the opposite of what the kids see outside of the school and that’s the hard part. It will be about competing messages unless the parents are willing to accept that the message they are sending is wrong. Good luck with that.

We don’t even have to guess or assume as we already know the answer. The best schools are those in which the parents, community and schools are on the same page. Thus, the idea that a school can be successful by trying to exist in a vacuum is just a gamble. Besides, the costs will be higher in the short term which is how we look at things in this country right now. The only way I can see it working is by separating the “bad” kids from the “good” kids. The families who have demonstrated a willingness to be involved and accept what the school is trying to do can all have their kids in a school that is trying to do things the best way possible. The others can just do what they were doing all along in a separate school. Right now you have schools taking out the top 10% of students and sending them to better schools when they should be taking out the bottom 10%. The point being that as long as the bad apples are allowed amongst the good it will bring everyone down regardless of what the school does.

[quote]StevenF wrote:
so better schools would possibly change things for the better. Yet, I just read an article recently about Chicago closing many schools in the poor neighborhoods. Is this being done by design or what?
[/quote]
I think it’s very possible by design in order to destroy the teachers’ union. The liberal elite right now are trying to do away with teaching as a profession so they can introduce TFA who are basically robots that follow the party line as written by people like Bill Gates. I know it’s fashionable to hate unions but what people need to understand is that when it comes to education you have several voices: teachers, administrators, politicians and parents. What the Common Core plan has in mind is to remove one of those voices, teachers, so that its advocates will have more power. Administrators will cave because Bill Gates (or orgs that he funds) will give them money (this is already happening). Parents won’t have a clue about what is going on and if they do speak up it will be them vs a “genius” billionaire. So what is happening is that education will become centralized and controlled by liberal elites who will also profit from it.

[quote]conservativedog wrote:
So is that your answer?

Some fake ass science from a professor (just like the ones that came up with global warming and ObamaCare) explains in a convincing manner that genes and environment make your behavior decisions?

We’re born good people but can not make good decisions as it is determined by genes and our environment?

That’s the reason Orenthal James Simpson put his foot on his my wife’s back and slit her throat?

Not everyone but so many of you young white “enlighted rainbow-coalition college graduates” do what this Charlotte couple did and freely put themselves in the way of being attacked, because to act circumspect or wary downtown or in a mall is “racist.”

In today’s politically correct wussified world, it’s better to be raped or beaten then for anyone to think you wouldn’t walk past them because you’re RACIST.

Me? Lift heavy weights and always conceal carry. Haven’t met anyone who’s genes & environment made them bullet proof. That’s my racist .02
[/quote]
Is there some point you’re trying to make other than showcasing your poor English? Come on Overfiend, it must be your first language.

[quote]zecarlo wrote:

Is there some point you’re trying to make other than showcasing your poor English? Come on Overfiend, it must be your first language. [/quote]

I wasn’t aware you and hfactless graded until the end of the semester.

As for “some point” I’m trying to make? Maybe you are already brainwashed by the very public school robots you are warning against. It’s your Genes & Environment that veils your accepting that thought.

There will be a change in the environment. It will be unleashed in a short few years, maybe less. I give Will Smith’s “I Am Legend” film as an example of what this change will mirror.

That film is a parallel for the chaos and frenzied attacks on our cities when the U.S. debt of $17 TRILLION causes the collapse of businesses and the eventual disappearance of all welfare.

Move away from the big cities. Keep your cars full of fuel. Keep Water & Canned Goods on hand.

[quote]conservativedog wrote:

[quote]zecarlo wrote:

Is there some point you’re trying to make other than showcasing your poor English? Come on Overfiend, it must be your first language. [/quote]

I wasn’t aware you and hfactless graded until the end of the semester.

As for “some point” I’m trying to make? Maybe you are already brainwashed by the very public school robots you are warning against. It’s your Genes & Environment that veils your accepting that thought.

There will be a change in the environment. It will be unleashed in a short few years, maybe less. I give Will Smith’s “I Am Legend” film as an example of what this change will mirror.

That film is a parallel for the chaos and frenzied attacks on our cities when the U.S. debt of $17 TRILLION causes the collapse of businesses and the eventual disappearance of all welfare.

Move away from the big cities. Keep your cars full of fuel. Keep Water & Canned Goods on hand.
[/quote]

I am so fucking ready. Bring on the human sized targets.

[quote]conservativedog wrote:

[quote]zecarlo wrote:

Is there some point you’re trying to make other than showcasing your poor English? Come on Overfiend, it must be your first language. [/quote]

I wasn’t aware you and hfactless graded until the end of the semester.

As for “some point” I’m trying to make? Maybe you are already brainwashed by the very public school robots you are warning against. It’s your Genes & Environment that veils your accepting that thought.

There will be a change in the environment. It will be unleashed in a short few years, maybe less. I give Will Smith’s “I Am Legend” film as an example of what this change will mirror.

That film is a parallel for the chaos and frenzied attacks on our cities when the U.S. debt of $17 TRILLION causes the collapse of businesses and the eventual disappearance of all welfare.

Move away from the big cities. Keep your cars full of fuel. Keep Water & Canned Goods on hand.
[/quote]
You still don’t make a point but that is just how The Overfiend operates.

[quote]zecarlo wrote:

[quote]conservativedog wrote:

[quote]zecarlo wrote:

Is there some point you’re trying to make other than showcasing your poor English? Come on Overfiend, it must be your first language. [/quote]

I wasn’t aware you and hfactless graded until the end of the semester.

As for “some point” I’m trying to make? Maybe you are already brainwashed by the very public school robots you are warning against. It’s your Genes & Environment that veils your accepting that thought.

There will be a change in the environment. It will be unleashed in a short few years, maybe less. I give Will Smith’s “I Am Legend” film as an example of what this change will mirror.

That film is a parallel for the chaos and frenzied attacks on our cities when the U.S. debt of $17 TRILLION causes the collapse of businesses and the eventual disappearance of all welfare.

Move away from the big cities. Keep your cars full of fuel. Keep Water & Canned Goods on hand.
[/quote]
You still don’t make a point but that is just how The Overfiend operates. [/quote]

…no rap zecarlo, i’m guessing you have a lack of emotional, social, and financial support. it probably causes you stress and influences your need to reply with your odd one sentence answers that only you and people like ted bundy or john wayne gacy can fathom.

just leave it alone. stop picking at it.

i am obviously not the dildo “overfiend character” that you keep claiming i am (you have never presented any links to quotes that you may think are near what i say. i have written enough on T-Nation that surely you could match something on that imaginary other forum you claim to have met with me in the past)

you and one or two other on T-Nation have a disease known as “retreatism”, a behavior first described by Howard Abadinsky, in which those suffering from such strain reject society’s goals and institutionalized means of achieving them. instead you find solace in fighting an imaginary foe “overfiend.”

please quit being so odd with your meaningless personal attacks or just simply don’t respond to me in my threads.

you probably can not stop.

meep

[quote]Mr. Walkway wrote:
meep[/quote]

We have a badass sighting!

[quote]conservativedog wrote:
i am obviously not the dildo…
[/quote]

Evidently you don’t know what obviously means.

[quote]zecarlo wrote:

[quote]conservativedog wrote:
i am obviously not the dildo…
[/quote]

Evidently you don’t know what obviously means. [/quote]

i stand corrected no rap zecarlo.

i am not the dildo.

[quote]zecarlo wrote:

[quote]StevenF wrote:
so better schools would possibly change things for the better. Yet, I just read an article recently about Chicago closing many schools in the poor neighborhoods. Is this being done by design or what?
[/quote]
I think it’s very possible by design in order to destroy the teachers’ union. The liberal elite right now are trying to do away with teaching as a profession so they can introduce TFA who are basically robots that follow the party line as written by people like Bill Gates. I know it’s fashionable to hate unions but what people need to understand is that when it comes to education you have several voices: teachers, administrators, politicians and parents. What the Common Core plan has in mind is to remove one of those voices, teachers, so that its advocates will have more power. Administrators will cave because Bill Gates (or orgs that he funds) will give them money (this is already happening). Parents won’t have a clue about what is going on and if they do speak up it will be them vs a “genius” billionaire. So what is happening is that education will become centralized and controlled by liberal elites who will also profit from it. [/quote]

There is an advantage to being impossibly old and having a memory to match. We have seen this all before.

The Community Action Program (CAP) was a chief organ of the War on Poverty initiated in 1965. The purpose was to funnel federal funds directly to “empower the community,” bypassing the local governments and their notorious corruption. (Their incredible failure is not lost on us 45 years later; they are still “active” now for no clear reason.) The interested reader will research the results: the nasty New York teachers’ strike of 1968–does the name Albert Shanker ring any bells?–

and the failure of Chicago schools.

Particularly in Chicago’s case, the Daley Machine corruption never wavered; it merely tolerated the newer corruption of the “empowered community,” with a brief interregnum in the late 1970’s.

“We have seen this all before” is seldom accepted on face value. But there is a history to guide us in these matters–and it ain’t pretty.

Why did Denis Rader do what he did? Ted Bundy? Jeffery Dahmer? Gacy? Timothy McVeigh? James Holmes? Adam Lanza? Charles Manson? Adolph Hitler?

I haven’t came to the conclusion that all white people do horrific things based off these men. I’ve came to the conclusion that some humans are sick and do horrific things. They may be white and from Kansas like me (see Rader). German ancestory like me (see Hitler) They may be black. They may be Hindu. They may be Methodist. They may be Atheist. They may be Muslim. Corruption, violence, hatred, it doesn’t have a race. It doesn’t have a religion. It doesn’t have a hair color. It doesn’t have a specific eye color.

You think it does. You NEVER post about anything horrible someone white has done. Is it your image you’re trying to upkeep? Are you afraid if you do someone will come to the conclusion you are also horrible since you share the same skin color? Or is that type of uneducated and irrational conclusion just a hallmark of your posts?

And you never talk about solutions or what should be done. All you do is run around screaming look at what black people have done. I’m not convinced you don’t google search the news daily HOPING to see a black person do something horrible so you can post about it.

[quote]H factor wrote:
I’m not convinced you don’t google search the news daily HOPING to see a black person do something horrible so you can post about it. [/quote]
That and “barely legal” porn. He used to post that crap all the time.


…trailer park moron admits he does not understand crime patterns and percentages or criminal statistics as he makes an assertion that the biggest city he has ever been to is Wal-Mart.

[quote]H factor wrote:

Why did Denis Rader do what he did? Ted Bundy? Jeffery Dahmer? Gacy? Timothy McVeigh? James Holmes? Adam Lanza? Charles Manson? Adolph Hitler?[/quote]

…you are accidentally close to what i try to point out…as adolf hitler targeted PRIMARILY jews, homosexuals, gypsies and Jehovah’s Witnesses. whereas in the specific crimes i mention blacks PRIMARILY target whites and jews.

[quote]H factor wrote:
I haven’t came to the conclusion that all white people do horrific things based off these men. I’ve came to the conclusion that some humans are sick and do horrific things. They may be white and from Kansas like me (see Rader). German ancestory like me (see Hitler) They may be black. They may be Hindu. They may be Methodist. They may be Atheist. They may be Muslim. Corruption, violence, hatred, it doesn’t have a race. It doesn’t have a religion. It doesn’t have a hair color. It doesn’t have a specific eye color.

You think it does. You NEVER post about anything horrible someone white has done. Is it your image you’re trying to upkeep? Are you afraid if you do someone will come to the conclusion you are also horrible since you share the same skin color? Or is that type of uneducated and irrational conclusion just a hallmark of your posts?

And you never talk about solutions or what should be done. All you do is run around screaming look at what black people have done. I’m not convinced you don’t google search the news daily HOPING to see a black person do something horrible so you can post about it. [/quote]

…gee did ted bundy, john wayne gacy, and the rest of your friends that you mentioned exclusively prey on and murder BLACKS, as so many lopsided crimes are committed by blacks against whites? NO.

are there thousands of these serial killer white men murdering only BLACKS month after month? NO.

did they only target whites for carjackings month after month? NO.

did they engage in running up to elderly BLACKS and knocking them out by the dozens? (only one white committed this black crime and the press along with eric holder jumped on him and him only) NO.

you have no comprehension of crime patterns or crime statistics.

you don’t even know how many whites are murdered, raped and assaulted by blacks, you just want to start shit, because you lack empathy for the whites targeted because of their skin color.

it’s been explained to you ad nauseum H-factless. quit being a trailer park prick and acting like you can’t read/google crime statistics.

[quote]zecarlo wrote:

[quote]H factor wrote:
I’m not convinced you don’t google search the news daily HOPING to see a black person do something horrible so you can post about it. [/quote]
That and “barely legal” porn. He used to post that crap all the time. [/quote]

prove it you little liar.

[quote]conservativedog wrote:

[quote]zecarlo wrote:

[quote]H factor wrote:
I’m not convinced you don’t google search the news daily HOPING to see a black person do something horrible so you can post about it. [/quote]
That and “barely legal” porn. He used to post that crap all the time. [/quote]

prove it you little liar.
[/quote]
You already admitted you were the Overfiend.

Sweet jeebus… you two get a room already.

[quote]conservativedog wrote:
…trailer park moron admits he does not understand crime patterns and percentages or criminal statistics as he makes an assertion that the biggest city he has ever been to is Wal-Mart.

[quote]H factor wrote:

Why did Denis Rader do what he did? Ted Bundy? Jeffery Dahmer? Gacy? Timothy McVeigh? James Holmes? Adam Lanza? Charles Manson? Adolph Hitler?[/quote]

…you are accidentally close to what i try to point out…as adolf hitler targeted PRIMARILY jews, homosexuals, gypsies and Jehovah’s Witnesses. whereas in the specific crimes i mention blacks PRIMARILY target whites and jews.

[quote]H factor wrote:
I haven’t came to the conclusion that all white people do horrific things based off these men. I’ve came to the conclusion that some humans are sick and do horrific things. They may be white and from Kansas like me (see Rader). German ancestory like me (see Hitler) They may be black. They may be Hindu. They may be Methodist. They may be Atheist. They may be Muslim. Corruption, violence, hatred, it doesn’t have a race. It doesn’t have a religion. It doesn’t have a hair color. It doesn’t have a specific eye color.

You think it does. You NEVER post about anything horrible someone white has done. Is it your image you’re trying to upkeep? Are you afraid if you do someone will come to the conclusion you are also horrible since you share the same skin color? Or is that type of uneducated and irrational conclusion just a hallmark of your posts?

And you never talk about solutions or what should be done. All you do is run around screaming look at what black people have done. I’m not convinced you don’t google search the news daily HOPING to see a black person do something horrible so you can post about it. [/quote]

…gee did ted bundy, john wayne gacy, and the rest of your friends that you mentioned exclusively prey on and murder BLACKS, as so many lopsided crimes are committed by blacks against whites? NO.

are there thousands of these serial killer white men murdering only BLACKS month after month? NO.

did they only target whites for carjackings month after month? NO.

did they engage in running up to elderly BLACKS and knocking them out by the dozens? (only one white committed this black crime and the press along with eric holder jumped on him and him only) NO.

you have no comprehension of crime patterns or crime statistics.

you don’t even know how many whites are murdered, raped and assaulted by blacks, you just want to start shit, because you lack empathy for the whites targeted because of their skin color.

it’s been explained to you ad nauseum H-factless. quit being a trailer park prick and acting like you can’t read/google crime statistics.

[/quote]

You’re so fucking full of shit apologizing for those assholes. God you are truly pathetic.

[quote]Over the past 30 years, black-on-white murders rose from 6 percent of all homicides to 8 percent, according to a study of more than half a million homicide reports assembled by Scripps Howard News Service from FBI and local police reports. White-on-black killings rose from 3 to 4 percent. All other racial combinations rose from 3 to 5 percent.

“There haven’t been a lot of studies done on this. But we do have racial groups mixing together more than they used to, so it makes sense that there would be more homicides across race,” said University of Florida Law School professor Katheryn Russell-Brown, author of “The Color of Crime.”[/quote]

[quote]The study found that the percentage of interracial killings among strangers is decreasing. In the 1980s, about 47 percent of white-on-black killings occurred between people who were strangers. That figure dropped to 40 percent since 2000.

The change was even more pronounced in cases of black-on-white homicides, where 48 percent were strangers in the 1980s, and only 34 percent in recent years.[/quote]

YOU a white racist old prick are much more likely STATISTICALLY to be murdered by a white person. Fucking prove that is wrong and I will NEVER post again in one of your threads.

You’re arguing something that no one has ever denied. Blacks commit crimes at a higher rate than whites. Welcome to something we have known for a long damn time. This isn’t a new phenomenon. Instead of searching for solutions, asking questions as to why, trying to figure out what we can do to lower this rate you aren’t.

You don’t give a shit about crime if it isn’t a black person committing it. You probably don’t give a shit about crime if it’s a black person doing it to another black person. You really only care about black on white crime. A white person killing a white person? No big deal. A white person killing a black person? No big deal. A black person killing a black person? No big deal. A black person killing a white person? It’s c-dog thread time.

We can prove with ACTUAL DATA you are full of shit. I think I’ve done it before and it doesn’t slow you down.