Here are some further facts regarding qualification for conservative status:
* An avatar that features either an eagle, the stars and stripes and/or the user stroking a handgun.
* An irrational sexual attraction to Jews and Ronald Reagan's corpse
* Make long rants on how you believe liberals control the entire universe and how they fail at life. Yet, you forget to realize that you were a liberal when you were a young homosexual. This explains why conservatives retain their homosexuality but begin to hide it.
* Go on and on about defending freedom yet masturbate to the arrests of protesters
* Taxing and spending is evil, yet unconditionally support the military which uses over half of all tax money.
* The ability to work Abortion, Gay marriage and no-fault divorce into every conversation
* A stockpile of rifles and firearms to "protect" you from the government military and law institutions that you simultaneously worship and believe can do no wrong, while also believing that your pathetic stockpile would help you if the party van came for you.
* A persecution complex
* An asshole complex
* Hate Islam while supporting most of their policies, as opposed to liberals who love Islam but hate most of their policies.
* Repressed homosexuality, often manifesting itself as blatant and actual gay sex, the memories of which are also later repressed.
* Gaps in immediate memory in conjunction with anal soreness.
* Pedophilia.
* Knowledge of where the best public restrooms to cruise for cock are.
[quote]GDollars37 wrote:
ZEB wrote:
PRCalDude wrote:
…In several states:
There’s always a silver lining, my friends.
I have not posted in a long time, but I can’t resist gloating just a tad. As I stated to forlife in our very lengthy debate a while ago, most Americans are simply not in favor of Homosexual marriage. When the voters have a say in it they vote it down just about every time.
Nice to see traditional values still matter.
ZEB! Welcome back. Got any advice for a guy trying to get from 12 chins to 20?[/quote]
[quote]Black Greg wrote:
rainjack wrote:
How many blacks have republicans killed? I’d like some real numbers on this since you threw it out there.
No problem, happy to oblige.
Studies show that over 100 years ago, republicans have killed well over 9000 blacks.
[/quote]
I would have thought you would’ve brought up the 50,000 blacks executed and left in the Louisiana swamp mentioned by Cynthia McKinney. That’s a much higher and more recent number.
We use statistics in everything and it i widely accepted, but when apply statistics to any ethnic or special interest group other than heterosexual white males, it becomes a stereotype or stigmatized as racist.
Why is this, that we aren’t allowed to use that mathematical science in those instances?
[quote]apbt55 wrote:
I have an off topic question?
We use statistics in everything and it i widely accepted, but when apply statistics to any ethnic or special interest group other than heterosexual white males, it becomes a stereotype or stigmatized as racist.
Why is this, that we aren’t allowed to use that mathematical science in those instances?[/quote]
Because the data are inconvenient to the PC dogma on display here.
[quote]PRCalDude wrote:
apbt55 wrote:
I have an off topic question?
We use statistics in everything and it i widely accepted, but when apply statistics to any ethnic or special interest group other than heterosexual white males, it becomes a stereotype or stigmatized as racist.
Why is this, that we aren’t allowed to use that mathematical science in those instances?
Because the data are inconvenient to the PC dogma on display here. [/quote]
There’s always a silver lining, my friends.[/quote]
Why is that a good thing? It just perpetuates a kind of apartheid, in which one group is treated like secondary citizens. It is apartheid: seperate but (supposedly) equal.
The funny thing is the driving force behind this ballot measure was the Mormons who historically have been the ones wanting to redefine marriage (polygamy).
In any case, marriage is not such a static institution. There was a time in Western history when it was little more than a means of ensuring that property would be passed on to heirs. It hasn’t always had romantic connotaions. My point is that marriage, like all institutions, is dynamic, not static.
Funny how SOME (not all) conservatives who militate against “Big Government” have no problems in using government towards reactionary ends, such as Proposition 8.
[quote]entheogens wrote:
Funny how SOME (not all) conservatives who militate against “Big Government” have no problems in using government towards reactionary ends, such as Proposition 8.
[/quote]
You’re from California, yet you have no clue what prop 8 was about. Absolutely amazing.
Do some research, then get back to me. Your ignorance of the issues is jaw dropping. I thought you were better than that.
[quote]Black Greg wrote:
Here are some further facts regarding qualification for conservative status:
* Go on and on about defending freedom yet masturbate to the arrests of protesters
[/quote]
Only liberal protesters, because they deserve it!
AAAHHH HOW DARE YOU TERRORISTS WILL EAT YOUR BABIES NOW! YOU JUST KILLED A MILLION AMERICAN SOLDIERS WITH YOUR WORDS!
Actually I’ve never, on this board, heard a single conservative speak out against no-fault divorce. This is clearly because, as they wish to deny rights to homosexuals, they are uncomfortable with having their own right to extricate themselves from such a contract taken away.
[quote]rainjack wrote:
Black Greg wrote:
rainjack wrote:
How many niggers have republicans killed? I’d like some real numbers on this since you threw it out there.
No problem, happy to oblige.
Studies show that over 100 years ago, republicans have killed well over 9000 niggers.
Really? How many of those murderers are still alive? And of the 9000 murders, you have proof that the killers were all conservative? I’d really like to see some proof that all the black people killed 100 years ago were killed by conservatives.
And how do you equate them with the conservatives of today?
You are a racist piece of shit. There is no place on this forum for racists.
[/quote]
His every single post has been simply riddled with ignorance.
Greg, wtf is it with you? Where do you come up with this stuff? You do realize that the republican party emerged in opposition to slavery, right?
On another note, I would just like to say that the NYT is reporting that “Hope is Flooding the World.” Will someone please call Al Gore?
Clearly, you know nothing of what it means to be conservative.
Conservatives are known for killing blacks, [/quote]
Clearly you don’t know conservatism either. It’s people like you who keep racism alive by making false statements like this. Blacks kill more blacks than all republicans COMBINED today.
Of course not, Rainjack. You’re the only wordy motherfucker on the planet, right?
I also tend to make use of the word irony - you know, like when someone pulls out a racist card while supporting the discrimination of a different, though massive, demographic.
[quote]NeelyDan wrote:
Of course not, Rainjack. You’re the only wordy motherfucker on the planet, right?
I also tend to make use of the word irony - you know, like when someone pulls out a racist card while supporting the discrimination of a different, though massive, demographic.
Of course, irony IS a difficult word to define.[/quote]
And you display a high level of ignorance on the issue at hand. Not that I am surprised at all.
[quote]rainjack wrote:
[…]Or it could be argued that they are fighting to keep the government from forcing its version of morality upon them. Especially with respect to Prop 8 in California. [/quote]
Sure could. I’d prefer an elected government push gay marriage through the parliamentary system. But let’s face it - current legislation often gets changed based on successful court challenges. If the system allows that, good luck to them.
Also, I personally don’t see marriage as a moral issue - it’s essentially a contract between two adults with varying levels of state support. And even if it were one - a poster said earlier to PRCalDude: ‘they don’t want to marry you’, just each other. Consenting adults - whatever makes them happy. I would see other issues as being more important.
[quote]rainjack wrote:
Ryan P. McCarter wrote:
PublickStews wrote:
I like how conservatives say “We need smaller government which stays out of our lives.” Then they vote to regulate the family life of private citizens. LOL
Haha, exactly.
I like how brain dead liberals don’t have a fucking clue about what these referendums were about.
But - then again, you voted for Obama, so knowledge of the issues has no meaning for you. [/quote]
Aw, he’s so CUTE when he’s mad! What a good little republican!
[quote]Ryan P. McCarter wrote:
rainjack wrote:
Ryan P. McCarter wrote:
PublickStews wrote:
I like how conservatives say “We need smaller government which stays out of our lives.” Then they vote to regulate the family life of private citizens. LOL
Haha, exactly.
I like how brain dead liberals don’t have a fucking clue about what these referendums were about.
But - then again, you voted for Obama, so knowledge of the issues has no meaning for you.
Aw, he’s so CUTE when he’s mad! What a good little republican!
pat pat
[/quote]
My political affiliation is not an issue.
You don’t know why Prop 8 was even brought to a vote.
You can laugh away my political leanings, but it is just pathetic to be so proudly ignorant of the issues.
[quote]makkun wrote:
Also, I personally don’t see marriage as a moral issue - it’s essentially a contract between two adults with varying levels of state support. And even if it were one - a poster said earlier to PRCalDude: ‘they don’t want to marry you’, just each other. Consenting adults - whatever makes them happy. I would see other issues as being more important.
Makkun[/quote]
I don’t have a problem with a contract between consenting adults. I think you are minimizing exactly what the militant gay agenda is about in this country.
They want preferential treatment under the law because of a lifestyle choice. They took it by force with the help of activist judges, which was the reasoning behind Prop 8.
The will of the people is the will of the people - which is the way it should be.