Marraige is between a man and a woman. Gays can have all the same rights but they should NOT call it a marraige.
What if homosexuality is a mental illness? Should they still be allowed to adopt?
MUSCLEROB: Youll be lucky if you dont get thrown in the slammer for even suggesting that idea in this PC* world.
- PC = Pussyfied & Corrupt
This seems to be an argument of semantics, it seems as though most people just want it to be called something that isn’t marriage. ie; civil union.
which makes sense, ALTHOUGH, Hindu’s get married, Athiests get married, Scientologists get married, these people don’t follow the same beliefs as Christians, but nobody cares about them.
If people want this:
}}}}}}}}}}@ @{{{{{{{{{{{
()() ()()
then let them, and if they want to be married, who cares, people with different beliefs get married all the time, but they don’t get married in Christian churches, that is the only concern of mine, stay our of the church and it’s fine.
“All marriage is same-sex marriage; every night, it?s the same sex.” ? Bill Maher
ShortDave marriage is not a Religon thing its between a man and a women not two men or two women. Yes, call it civil union if you want give them the same right even. But, why call it a marriage (moral purpose).
How do you explain it to your kids? Yes, those two men are married and so those two women also, a man and a women. The child is just going get freaking confused out of his or her mind. Especially, if the child is in a gay marriage.
What IS the exact definition of a civil union? Is it ONLY between a couple of the same sex?
I’m against gay marriage. I’m against gay anything.
Homosexuals are not normal. I don’t care what anyone says. Any man that wants to have a dick, or anything else shoved up his ass, has got some serious problems.
I don’t think gays should be allowed to adopt either. Kids have enough problems nowadays without being raised by two people who are seriously fucked up.
I’m not that old, but I can remember a time when people that were gay hid the fact or where “in the closet”. They did this because they knew what they were doing was wrong, and that all the normal people would not approve.
Society as a whole has pretty much gone to hell in a handbag. Everything is so PC.
Now, not only do I have to accept that your gay, I have to like it.
What’s next, every guy has to learn how to suck a dick, in order to gradutate high school?
How about all you gays just go back in the closet, or better yet, get some therapy.
The world won’t tell you, but I will, you are fucked up. You need to seriously get your shit together.
Men were designed to be with women, and women were designed to be with men. Call it God or nature, I don’t care, you can’t argue with the facts.
Of course this is just my opinion, but I AM RIGHT ABOUT THIS.
Believe it or not, I don’t mean to offend you. If I do, reread the post, and then go get that therapy.
OKay I get where you are coming from… and if that is the way you want to define it, then you are right, but I still think this is a question of semantics, if they would just change the name, it would most likely be a non-issue.
and my ‘picture’ screwed up… it might have been funny, but not anymore, (it was supposed to be to dinks touching) but now there is just a jumble that looks like nothing.
Fitone, regarding adoption of teens: What about a very religious (regardless of what religion) couple adopting a baby? Wouldn’t they be influencing the baby’s life? So should religious people only adopt teens that can ‘think for themselves’? I hardly think that homosexual couples ‘force their lifestyle’ onto their adopted baby.
About the procreation issue:
What about sterility? Can a congenitally sterile indivdual ever be married?
What about a man, married to a women, who gets a vasectomy? Is he not still considered ‘married’?
Regarding ‘there CAN BE NO UNION between like “things”’
2 words: Lipid bilayer
The hydrophobic portions of the lipid bilayer like to stick together.
… just playing devil’s advocate here…
Ok it seems many people have expressed concern that gay marriage could lead to further immoral concepts (incest, bestiality, etc.) so it should not be permitted…
Well since it seems that hetero-marriage is what has lead us to this predicament perhaps instead of permitting gay marriage we should be looking at banning marriage altogether. After all, marriage can lead to adultery, divorce, spousal abuse and other immoral behavior.
Well since it seems that hetero-marriage is what has lead us to this predicament perhaps instead of permitting gay marriage we should be looking at banning marriage altogether. After all, marriage can lead to adultery, divorce, spousal abuse and other immoral behavior.
Actions of individuals that are against the law vs. creating laws that would allow for disgusting deviant behavior are two totally different things.
Thank you Scott1010220, I was afraid that I was the only normal person left in this world.
FatSensei
Correction, Patricia.
60% of marriages ending in divorce is a gross exaggeration.
Religion, is different someone who is Jewish can change their mind and become Cathloic or visa versa. Or, a musliam become Cathloic. Or people that were believed in confusius or the Gov. in China have coverted to cathloic. Seen it happen many times.
Religon, is taught kids either learn it or accept it or they don’t learn it or don’t accept it.
Gay lifestyle on the hand is a lifestyle and children are affected by lifestyles
People in a cult type sitution on the other hand, they shouldn’t have children either.
I’m not gay, so why should I have a say in this?? If they wanna do it, let them do it. Who are we to say they can’t?
About the divorce statistic: just do a google search on “how many marriages end in divorce.”
Yeah, and I’m not a rapist rangertab, so why should I have a say in that?
What kind of logic is that?
rangertab75–
We usually don’t agree on much…but I agree with you on that one!
btw are you actually an Army Ranger?
fitone, good point. However I would argue that religion is a lifestyle. Granted, yes, one can convert to another religion, each religon possesses ideals and values that are unique to that particular religion and practiced by those members who accept that religion.
My point being, religion is often more ‘pressed’ (for lack of a better word) upon the child in a devote household (through church, church functions, prayer,etc etc) much more so than homosexuality. And, according to my belief, I don’t think one can ‘learn’ to be homosexual.
One either has feelings for men, or doesn’t. My point being, while the child may grow up in a homosexual household, I don’t believe he will TURN homosexual. At most, it will teach the child to be tolerant of other lifestyles.
Just my 2 cents…