I would have to say you are right on one account. The account that there are always people who think the information they have is the correct information and they have “the inside line” so to speak. However, to reject any other viewpoints or evidence “out-of-hand” simply because it seems ridiculous or goes against the grain, is simply wrong-headed thinking. Any trained observer will look at all the evidence and then, at some point, draw a conclusion…even if that conclusion cannot be substantiated 100%. In the case of the moon landing, the preponderance of the evidence points that yes, man did indeed land on the moon. On the other hand, the lack of stars in the photo’s, no dust anywhere on the LM or the Rover (tires), shadows that are cast in opposing directions, Armstrongs back to the Sun and instead of his front being shadowed, it is brightly illuminated, and an ungainly, four-legged, top-heavy, unstable LM that did not function on Earth (as Armstrong was nearly killed in the Texas simulator) was able to land on the moon six (6) times without incident? Well, it makes me think and weigh the evidence…while I formulate my conclusion. I suppose that’s what T-Men should do…
Related topics
Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
---|---|---|---|---|
From The Earth To The Moon? | 0 | 211 | August 31, 2002 | |
From The Earth To The Moon? | 0 | 232 | September 20, 2002 | |
From The Earth To The Moon? | 0 | 203 | September 1, 2002 | |
From The Earth To The Moon? | 0 | 236 | September 18, 2002 | |
From The Earth To The Moon? | 0 | 216 | September 1, 2002 |