French Presidential Elections

Off Topic Politics & World Issues
101

[quote]Headhunter wrote:
lixy wrote:
John S. wrote:
Really, Threaten to nuke a country that says they will destroy us and is trying to develope nukes. ARE YOU THAT FUCKING STUPID ITS CALLED SELF DEFENCE.

First of all, please stop capitalizing your posts. It makes you look really bad. Secondly, Iran has the right under the NPT to civil nuclear energy and has publically issued a fatwa against military nuclear power. Bear in mind that, a fatwa is something pretty sacred in Iran.

Now we can rest easy; a fat-something-or-other will protect us. No worries anymore about nukes!

But why is it ‘fat’? How about a skinnywa or, even better, a rippedwa?

These are all legitimate questions and, under Sharee’s Law (she works at a bar near my house), you MUST answer them!!

[/quote]

What happened to Islam meaning to submit, HH?

And anyway, how the hell will Iran nuke us? With what missiles? What is gonna stop us from wiping them off the face of the Earth after words? Do you think they think we won’t?

Nuking Iran isn’t the answer. If it gets far out of hand, invasion might be. I hope it does not escalate to that point. Iran is obviously a much greater threat than Iraq ever was (mainly because Iraq was never an actual threat), and should definetly be treated as such. But jumping to killing masses of their civilians is immoral, and just plain stupid.

102

[quote]lixy wrote:
John S. wrote:
Really, Threaten to nuke a country that says they will destroy us and is trying to develope nukes. ARE YOU THAT FUCKING STUPID ITS CALLED SELF DEFENCE.

First of all, please stop capitalizing your posts. It makes you look really bad. Secondly, Iran has the right under the NPT to civil nuclear energy and has publically issued a fatwa against military nuclear power. Bear in mind that, a fatwa is something pretty sacred in Iran. Thirdly, when has Iran threatened to destroy you? As far as I know, that would be suicidal even with the help of every country that’s antagonistic to the US. Last but not least, “self-defence” (sic) isn’t something you can call when all you have are suppositions. Remember Iraq?

Now, to get back to the topic, it’s finally official: Sarkozy won by a clear majority at 53.1%.

First off I will capitalize my post when trying to make a point to someone as retarded as you. Iran has said death to Israel and death to America numerouse times. Now I don’t know about you but if someone says there going to kill me I take that as a threat, I hope you do too.

103

[quote]John S. wrote:
Iran has said […] death to America numerouse times. [/quote]

Care to provide a reference to that claim? Thanks.

104

[quote]lixy wrote:
John S. wrote:
Iran has said […] death to America numerouse times.

Care to provide a reference to that claim? Thanks.

[/quote]

Care to provide a reference to the claim “bush has threatened to nuke iran”…? Or… are you above your own “laws”…?

On topic: It’s a great day for freedom! Another socialist is turned down.

105

It’s amazing. The opinions expressed at the polls around the world the last few years bears seems out of line with the world the media tells us about. 'Cept the one on that fould and corrupt organ Fox News!

Seems to me liberalism is dying a SLOOOOOOOW death worldwide. The last people to get the memo are in the media.

106

[quote]Beowolf wrote:
…And anyway, how the hell will Iran nuke us? With what missiles? What is gonna stop us from wiping them off the face of the Earth after words? Do you think they think we won’t?
… [/quote]

A ship in NY Harbor would do nicely.

MAD may not work with people that want to see the end of days.

107

[quote]John S. wrote:
lixy wrote:
John S. wrote:
Really, Threaten to nuke a country that says they will destroy us and is trying to develope nukes. ARE YOU THAT FUCKING STUPID ITS CALLED SELF DEFENCE.

First of all, please stop capitalizing your posts. It makes you look really bad. Secondly, Iran has the right under the NPT to civil nuclear energy and has publically issued a fatwa against military nuclear power.

Bear in mind that, a fatwa is something pretty sacred in Iran. Thirdly, when has Iran threatened to destroy you? As far as I know, that would be suicidal even with the help of every country that’s antagonistic to the US. Last but not least, “self-defence” (sic) isn’t something you can call when all you have are suppositions. Remember Iraq?

Now, to get back to the topic, it’s finally official: Sarkozy won by a clear majority at 53.1%.

First off I will capitalize my post when trying to make a point to someone as retarded as you. Iran has said death to Israel and death to America numerouse times. Now I don’t know about you but if someone says there going to kill me I take that as a threat, I hope you do too.[/quote]

According to the Left, you should ignore those threats and try to be more understanding of Islamic culture. They (Muslims), however, don’t have to understand us and can say anything they please. They can kill people over cartoons and can threaten others with death, but its all our fault.

108

[quote]Beowolf wrote:
Headhunter wrote:
lixy wrote:
John S. wrote:
Really, Threaten to nuke a country that says they will destroy us and is trying to develope nukes. ARE YOU THAT FUCKING STUPID ITS CALLED SELF DEFENCE.

First of all, please stop capitalizing your posts. It makes you look really bad. Secondly, Iran has the right under the NPT to civil nuclear energy and has publically issued a fatwa against military nuclear power. Bear in mind that, a fatwa is something pretty sacred in Iran.

Now we can rest easy; a fat-something-or-other will protect us. No worries anymore about nukes!

But why is it ‘fat’? How about a skinnywa or, even better, a rippedwa?

These are all legitimate questions and, under Sharee’s Law (she works at a bar near my house), you MUST answer them!!

What happened to Islam meaning to submit, HH?

And anyway, how the hell will Iran nuke us? With what missiles? What is gonna stop us from wiping them off the face of the Earth after words? Do you think they think we won’t?

Nuking Iran isn’t the answer. If it gets far out of hand, invasion might be. I hope it does not escalate to that point. Iran is obviously a much greater threat than Iraq ever was (mainly because Iraq was never an actual threat), and should definetly be treated as such. But jumping to killing masses of their civilians is immoral, and just plain stupid. [/quote]

Since a nuke set off here would be by terrorists, not Iranian military, the Left here would scream bloody murder if we retaliated. “Oh, its just a crime! How dare you bomb Iran!!” Yeah…tell it to the families of the victims…

109

[quote]DS 007 wrote:
It’s amazing. The opinions expressed at the polls around the world the last few years bears seems out of line with the world the media tells us about. 'Cept the one on that fould and corrupt organ Fox News!

Seems to me liberalism is dying a SLOOOOOOOW death worldwide. The last people to get the memo are in the media.[/quote]

Totally unfounded and errorfilled statements are so cute.

110

[quote]Beowolf wrote:

And the right accommodates the guys who want to have a collection of Ak-47’s.[/quote]

This makes no sense. There is no inherent crime in owning an AK-47.

How so? Do they suggest that the said maniacs shouldn’t be punished under law?

There are plenty of accommodationists on the extreme Right - but so what? Does that somehow make the accommodation made by the Left of these demons justified, which is what we are talking about here?

Trust me, if anyone tries to make an argument that it is ok to beat gays or blow up abortion clinics, I’ll pounce on them too.

And what does gay marriage have to do with it?

Who disagrees with this?

[quote]I do not “accommodate” any of these ridiculous riots. I see some of their points, yes, but that does not mean I condone the violence.

Acknowledging someones reasoning is not condoning the actions they take based on that reasoning.[/quote]

But the Left doesn’t merely “acknowledge reasons” - if French authorities drag out violent radicals that have initiated mayhem and punishes them to the full extent of the law, will the Left be saying…

  1. “Well, I understand their point, but they had it coming. Punish them and hard for their actions.”

Or will they be chanting…

  1. “Injustice! Punishing those who are victims of oppression for merely lashing out against the oppression is unjust!!!”

Now, speculating is tough, and this is a broad generalization to be sure. But which broad generalization is closer to the mark?

111

[quote]lixy wrote:
John S. wrote:
Iran has said […] death to America numerouse times.

Care to provide a reference to that claim? Thanks.

[/quote]

I can post more if you want. Or can I call this check mate?

112

[quote]lixy wrote:
John S. wrote:
Iran has said […] death to America numerouse times.

Care to provide a reference to that claim? Thanks.

[/quote]

And one more to put the nail in your coffin. Please come back and play another day.

113

[quote]lixy wrote:
John S. wrote:
Iran has said […] death to America numerouse times.

Care to provide a reference to that claim? Thanks.

[/quote]

http://www.militantislammonitor.org/article/id/1190

And one more to make you shut the fuck up.

114

[quote]John S. wrote:

I can post more if you want. Or can I call this check mate?[/quote]

Civilians protesting the “axis of evil” speech is evidence that Iran calls for your destruction? It doesn’t fly.

By your logic, it’ll be Ok to retaliate against the US just because HH and others call for nuking Iran.

115

[quote]lixy wrote:
John S. wrote:

I can post more if you want. Or can I call this check mate?

Civilians protesting the “axis of evil” speech is evidence that Iran calls for your destruction? It doesn’t fly.

By your logic, it’ll be Ok to retaliate against the US just because HH and others call for nuking Iran. [/quote]

Read the others, you asked for when they said death to america you dumb fuck. Don’t go changing the rules because you lost, take it like a man and SHUT THE FUCK UP.

116

[quote]John S. wrote:
Read the others, you asked for when they said death to america you dumb fuck. Don’t go changing the rules because you lost, take it like a man and SHUT THE FUCK UP.[/quote]

Listen kiddo, there is a huge difference between a country calling for the destruction of another, and a bunch of people rioting in the streets. Here’s what you wrote:

“Iran has said […] death to America numerouse (sic) times.”

That’s accusing Iran of wanting to destroy the US. If you’re stupid enough to think Tehran would hand in a casus belli like that to Bush, you’re deeply mistaken. The rioting in Tehran you linked to, where people burn effigies of Bush is common place around the world, from Latin America to East-Asia.

Now, go back to whatever you do in that barrack, you ridiculous imbecile.

117

[quote]lixy wrote:
John S. wrote:
Read the others, you asked for when they said death to america you dumb fuck. Don’t go changing the rules because you lost, take it like a man and SHUT THE FUCK UP.

Listen kiddo, there is a huge difference between a country calling for the destruction of another, and a bunch of people rioting in the streets. Here’s what you wrote:

“Iran has said […] death to America numerouse (sic) times.”

That’s accusing Iran of wanting to destroy the US. If you’re stupid enough to think Tehran would hand in a casus belli like that to Bush, you’re deeply mistaken. The rioting in Tehran you linked to, where people burn effigies of Bush is common place around the world, from Latin America to East-Asia.

Now, go back to whatever you do in that barrack, you ridiculous imbecile.[/quote]

Listen, even there pres has said death to israel death to america(its in one of my links I provided). So why don’t you shut the fuck up and admit you lost. Or better yet say some more stupid stuff I have a blast making you look like a fucking retard.

118

[quote]lixy wrote:
John S. wrote:
Read the others, you asked for when they said death to america you dumb fuck. Don’t go changing the rules because you lost, take it like a man and SHUT THE FUCK UP.

Listen kiddo, there is a huge difference between a country calling for the destruction of another, and a bunch of people rioting in the streets. Here’s what you wrote:

“Iran has said […] death to America numerouse (sic) times.”

That’s accusing Iran of wanting to destroy the US. If you’re stupid enough to think Tehran would hand in a casus belli like that to Bush, you’re deeply mistaken. The rioting in Tehran you linked to, where people burn effigies of Bush is common place around the world, from Latin America to East-Asia.

Now, go back to whatever you do in that barrack, you ridiculous imbecile.[/quote]

I have read many times that the protests in the street in Iran are government organized and the Iranian people are peace loving.

Is it the Iranian people that wish for death to America or is it the Iranian government or does it change?

119

I brought up both the people and the government saying it, so if there are any deniers out there please get your eyes checked because I have shown you proof.

120

[quote]lixy wrote:
John S. wrote:
Read the others, you asked for when they said death to america you dumb fuck. Don’t go changing the rules because you lost, take it like a man and SHUT THE FUCK UP.

Listen kiddo, there is a huge difference between a country calling for the destruction of another, and a bunch of people rioting in the streets. Here’s what you wrote:

“Iran has said […] death to America numerouse (sic) times.”

That’s accusing Iran of wanting to destroy the US. If you’re stupid enough to think Tehran would hand in a casus belli like that to Bush, you’re deeply mistaken. The rioting in Tehran you linked to, where people burn effigies of Bush is common place around the world, from Latin America to East-Asia.

Now, go back to whatever you do in that barrack, you ridiculous imbecile.[/quote]

Listen up kiddo…

You try to ignore me, beacause you know that you don’t stand a chance… but still: YOU made the first claim… you said that Bush threatened Iran with nukes. You have failed to PROVE this statement… you are just ignoring those that ask for proof…

Just back down… ok? You were wrong, admit it and move on.