Free Will

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:[quote]pat wrote:God ‘predestined’ the revelation toward certain people (First Jew, then Greek…etc.) but not the people’s acceptance. People can and did and do reject it. Christ’s salvation was ordained for ‘all men’, which is not the same as forced on some and withheld from others.
[/quote]Excellent Post![/quote]Except that it’s entirely unbiblical. The God of the bible doesn’t “force” anybody to be saved, but He saves every last one He intends to and it is untrue that “some” reject it. ALL reject it until subdued and drawn sweetly and submissively by His grace. Stay tuned. I am hoping the most thorough and concentrated treatment thus far is coming between Cortes and I.
[/quote]

Unbiblical? LOL!
That is John 3:17 my friend, period. That’s as biblical as it gets. Fore-ordination is in tremendous conflict with John 3:17.

No it is not in any way once your God is big enough.

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
No it is not in any way once your God is big enough.[/quote]

Except you can use that same line to justify anything and everything.

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:

[quote]forlife wrote:<<< Calvin’s message resonated with you. >>>[/quote]Calvin’s message did not resonate with me. The power of the Holy Spirit branded the Godhood of God and the depravity of Greg on my soul in a painful, hissing, sizzling, smoking work of conviction. You know me by now. Picture how hard it was for me to admit I was dead wrong believing in a God who was less powerful than I was. That’s the god who wants to save everybody but they just won’t let him. [quote]forlife wrote:<<< It makes no sense that Jesus would weep for people that refuse to accept him, and would say that he wants to save them, but for their own stubborn will, if Calvin was correct. Calvin believes in a god that chooses who to save and who to damn, and takes glory in both.[/quote]It would make no sense if it were the father weeping. For the incarnate Christ? Makes perfect sense to me. Yes, Calvin rediscovered the holy almighty sovereign Lord of heaven and earth who out of unthinkable merciful grace chose to save some out His creation which is universally deserving of His eternal wrath. He could have justly left all to their sin and death.
[/quote]

You’re misrepresenting what people believe on that point. It’s not that god isn’t powerful enough to force everyone to do his will. It’s that he is unwilling to force everyone to do his will. What kind of glory is it when people only worship you because you instilled the desire for them to do so? It’s like patting yourself on the back. True glory comes from the voluntary submission of a man’s will to god, when he might have chosen otherwise.

The incarnate Christ said that he and his Father are one. If he wept and desired all to repent and accept his gift, the Father did as well.

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
No it is not in any way once your God is big enough.[/quote]

Yeah Tirib you are definitely going to have to explain to me what you are talking about here, because I’m seeing what looks like a whole lot of scriptural evidence in support of free will and so far only one passage against from you (I think).

And the difference between them has been the fact that the supporting passages seem quite unequivocal in their implication that man does indeed have a choice in the matter. I can’t find a whole lot of wiggle room in “For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but in order that the world might be saved through him.”

[quote]Cortes wrote:

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
No it is not in any way once your God is big enough.[/quote]

Yeah Tirib you are definitely going to have to explain to me what you are talking about here, because I’m seeing what looks like a whole lot of scriptural evidence in support of free will and so far only one passage against from you (I think).

And the difference between them has been the fact that the supporting passages seem quite unequivocal in their implication that man does indeed have a choice in the matter. I can’t find a whole lot of wiggle room in “For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but in order that the world might be saved through him.”[/quote]Read Romans 9

[quote]forlife wrote:<<< You’re misrepresenting what people believe on that point. >>>[/quote]No, my dear elder forlife. THEY are misrepresenting what they believe on that point no matter what they attempt to produce to the contrary.

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:

[quote]forlife wrote:<<< You’re misrepresenting what people believe on that point. >>>[/quote]No, my dear elder forlife. THEY are misrepresenting what they believe on that point no matter what they attempt to produce to the contrary.
[/quote]

Care to explain, or are you just going to make authoritative declarations without backing it up?

How is it limiting the power of god by believing that god chooses not to compel people to worship him? Just because he doesn’t do so doesn’t mean he couldn’t do so if he willed it.

It’s like accusing you of limiting the power of god by believing he doesn’t have the power to save everyone from damnation. Is it that he lacks the power, or is it a question of his will?

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:

[quote]forlife wrote:<<< You’re misrepresenting what people believe on that point. >>>[/quote]No, my dear elder forlife. THEY are misrepresenting what they believe on that point no matter what they attempt to produce to the contrary.
[/quote]

Who is they? I have not represented what I believe, at all. You may think it’s wrong, but it is not represented.

I have read Romans 9, I don’t see how God choosing certain people to do his will has to do with the ability to choose or refuse Him and that one could have chosen otherwise. God’s will will be done wither or not you accept or refuse Him. You can refuse his grace and yet his will, will still be done. But you are not accountable for His will, you are accountable for yours. John Cahp 5, Jesus laments how God has presented his glory to the people and they refuse Him, not by God’s will but their own…

Like I said, you can use the ‘God is big enough and powerful enough to over come anything.’ Line, but just because he could doesn’t mean He did…God can over come anything and everything, but he doesn’t.

God doesn’t compel anyone. They come freely by His electing grace by once again, eternal mechanisms known only to Himself. I don’t have time now.

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
God doesn’t compel anyone. They come freely by His electing grace by once again, eternal mechanisms known only to Himself. I don’t have time now.[/quote]

I feared you would focus on the semantics, at the expense of my actual point. Please do respond when you get the time.

Why does god raise some to life, while leaving others in spiritual death? Is he not powerful enough to raise all to life?

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
God doesn’t compel anyone. They come freely by His electing grace by once again, eternal mechanisms known only to Himself. I don’t have time now.[/quote]

That’s 100% contradictory.

[quote]forlife wrote:

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
God doesn’t compel anyone. They come freely by His electing grace by once again, eternal mechanisms known only to Himself. I don’t have time now.[/quote]

I feared you would focus on the semantics, at the expense of my actual point. Please do respond when you get the time.

Why does god raise some to life, while leaving others in spiritual death? Is he not powerful enough to raise all to life?[/quote]Where is that all governing principle or framework that dictates every thought that flitters across elder’s forlife’s brain? Yes, that is THE issue here.

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
God doesn’t compel anyone. They come freely by His electing grace by once again, eternal mechanisms known only to Himself. I don’t have time now.[/quote]

That’s 100% contradictory.[/quote]Like the incarnation?

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:

[quote]forlife wrote:

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
God doesn’t compel anyone. They come freely by His electing grace by once again, eternal mechanisms known only to Himself. I don’t have time now.[/quote]

I feared you would focus on the semantics, at the expense of my actual point. Please do respond when you get the time.

Why does god raise some to life, while leaving others in spiritual death? Is he not powerful enough to raise all to life?[/quote]Where is that all governing principle or framework that dictates every thought that flitters across elder’s forlife’s brain? Yes, that is THE issue here.
[/quote]

Still dodging the point, I see.

Don’t worry, next time you accuse Christians of limiting the power of god I’ll be sure to point out why your own doctrine does the same thing.

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
God doesn’t compel anyone. They come freely by His electing grace by once again, eternal mechanisms known only to Himself. I don’t have time now.[/quote]

That’s 100% contradictory.[/quote]Like the incarnation?
[/quote]

No.

You can explain the incarnation Pat. The second person of the immutable Godhead now has a body He didn’t have before as if even the concept of before were applicable to a being who created and transcends time? This is not contradictory?

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
You can explain the incarnation Pat. The second person of the immutable Godhead now has a body He didn’t have before as if even the concept of before were applicable to a being who created and transcends time? This is not contradictory?[/quote]

No it’s not contradictory. To not have a body and then have a body is not contradictory, we all participate in that reality. It may be odd, it is a miracle, but it is not contradictory. What is contradictory is to say that every move we make is foreordained but we have freewill. That is contradictory. The two thoughts are polar opposites and impossible to reconcile. It’s not reconcilable.
It’s also not to say that there aren’t many things in our lives that are predestined. Like getting stuck in traffic, missing your flight only to find out 30 minutes later the plane crashed.
When I see election and predestination in scripture, it’s to whom the Good News is delivered, not who chooses and rejects it. That’s a huge difference.
Further, you have posited at one time that all our decisions are made even before we’re born?? I see nothing in the scriptures that makes that claim. God knowing us before we are born is not the same as predestination. I know my kids, I can pretty much predict what they will do based on how they have always reacted, but I don’t really know what they will do and they frequently surprise me. And yes, I already knew them en-uturo.

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:

[quote]Cortes wrote:

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
No it is not in any way once your God is big enough.[/quote]

Yeah Tirib you are definitely going to have to explain to me what you are talking about here, because I’m seeing what looks like a whole lot of scriptural evidence in support of free will and so far only one passage against from you (I think).

And the difference between them has been the fact that the supporting passages seem quite unequivocal in their implication that man does indeed have a choice in the matter. I can’t find a whole lot of wiggle room in “For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but in order that the world might be saved through him.”[/quote]Read Romans 9
[/quote]

Okay. Sorry it took me so long to get back here, I was genuinely busy taking care of visiting family along with my own family and business. I finally have my small bit of free time to myself again.

To continue, so Tirib, putting aside for a moment the fact that I believe Romans 9 is not meant to be interpreted in the manner you are purporting, are you suggesting that it, Romans 9, informs the rest of the Bible? Informs Deuteronomy 30:19?

Joshua 24:15?

Isaiah 65:12?

Ezekiel 18:23?

Matthew 23:37 & Luke 13:34?

John 3:16-17?

Even the selfsame Romans 14:12?

1 Timothy 2:3-4?

You are going to have to explain to me why Romans 9 appears to negate a whole slough of other passages that pretty unambiguously assume human self-determination and ultimate accountability for one’s actions. I’m not seeing it.

[quote]Cortes wrote:<<< are you suggesting that it, Romans 9, informs the rest of the Bible? >>>[/quote]No. I’m proclaiming that the 9th of Romans is but one of numerous descriptions of the one true and living God who informs absolutely EVERYTHING including the entirety of Holy Scripture. I will say if Romans 9 was all we had the principle would stand. It is not possible to portray anything clearer in human language. To paraphrase in a nuthshell: I, God will choose who I will love, who I will hate, who I will save, who I will condemn, who I bless and who I will curse CUZ I"M GOD AND YOU AIN’T. Paul even goes so far as to anticipate the universal objection: “you will say to me then, why does He still find fault for who resists His will?” Paul answers with “who are you oh man who answers back to God? Does not the potter have the right over the clay to make from the SAME LUMP one vessel for this and another for that?”.

Don’t ya see? You are saying that very thing: “Hey now wait a minute here, how on earth can God hold men accountable when they’re only doing what He planned for them?”. Paul (wisely) doesn’t even venture a guess at how that works. He simply says “shaddup, He’s God and you ain’t” again to paraphrase. That only even requires interpretation at all by those attempting to escape it’s unavoidable message.

[quote]Cortes wrote:You are going to have to explain to me why Romans 9 appears to negate a whole slough of other passages that pretty unambiguously assume human self-determination and ultimate accountability for one’s actions. I’m not seeing it. [/quote]There are NUMEROUS other passages, even simple declarations in proverbs, that clearly state that God almighty is in ultimate control of all that transpires in time in history. 16:33 for instance (short on time here) “The lot is cast into the lap, But its every decision is from the LORD” Casting lots in the ancient world was the rough equivalent of rolling dice. Even when men go out of their way to DESIGN a chance occurrence “it’s every decision is from the Lord”. Tons more. I’ll address this more fully later tonight I hope, but it is actually syllogistic in a way. "Here’s what God says about Himself. Here’s what God says about man. What God says about man is informed and governed by what what God says about Himself. What God says about Himself in His relations with finite man are also informed and governed by His infinite nature. The only alternative is to make man the governor of God which has been and is routinely done throughout history because man is sinful, self centered and prideful.

The Westminster Assembly (1642-46) which consisted of dozens and dozens of God fearing reverent men took 4 years to agree on language for their confession and catechisms though that won’t impress Catholics. But anyway they REALLY got it right, simply stating what the whole of scripture reports though it is clearly beyond human comprehension.

Of God’s eternal Decree: Section 1
“1. God from all eternity did by the most wise and holy counsel of his own will, freely and unchangeably ordain whatsoever comes to pass; yet so as thereby neither is God the author of sin; nor is violence offered to the will of the creatures, nor is the liberty or contingency of second causes taken away, but rather established.”

The Westminster standards also actually has a section titled “Free Will” which begins with:
“1. God hath endued the will of man with that natural liberty, that is neither forced, nor by any absolute necessity of nature determined to good or evil.”

God is utterly sovereign and man is for his sin and evil utterly responsible. I have no idea how that works and am quite certain that if I did we wouldn’t be talking about God because any God who can fit between my ears is no God at all.