For Those on the Fence

Jason, who is it that keeps giving your threads five-star ratings?

[quote]Varqanir wrote:
Jason, who is it that keeps giving your threads five-star ratings?[/quote]

Mea Culpa.

[quote]Headhunter wrote:
Varqanir wrote:
Jason, who is it that keeps giving your threads five-star ratings?

Mea Culpa.

[/quote]

Ha. I should have known.

some one intrested in a certain candidate

Yes, for those of us “on the fence”, this brilliant, thought-provoking piece will surely provide great insights.

Seriously - when did every day around here turn into kindergarten?

[quote]Varqanir wrote:
Jason, who is it that keeps giving your threads five-star ratings?[/quote]

My Mom is a member here too…

[quote]thunderbolt23 wrote:
Yes, for those of us “on the fence”, this brilliant, thought-provoking piece will surely provide great insights.

Seriously - when did every day around here turn into kindergarten?[/quote]

Hmm. How about a youtube video of Ron Paul saving 30 orphans single-handedly from a raging fire? What do you think, do anything for ya?

[quote]
thunderbolt23 wrote:
Yes, for those of us “on the fence”, this brilliant, thought-provoking piece will surely provide great insights.

Seriously - when did every day around here turn into kindergarten?

Sloth wrote:
Hmm. How about a youtube video of Ron Paul saving 30 orphans single-handedly from a raging fire? What do you think, do anything for ya?[/quote]

Maybe if you have one of him dropping into Pakistan and pulling out the heart of Osama bin Laden, then swooping back in to the U.S.A. and squatting ass-to-grass 1200 lbs. and pooping a gold brick… no cartoons though - live-action only.

[quote]BostonBarrister wrote:

Maybe if you have one of him dropping into Pakistan and pulling out the heart of Osama bin Laden, then swooping back in to the U.S.A. and squatting ass-to-grass 1200 lbs. and pooping a gold brick… no cartoons though - live-action only.[/quote]

Hrm. I’ll check youtube and get back to you later with it.

[quote]Sloth wrote:

Hmm. How about a youtube video of Ron Paul saving 30 orphans single-handedly from a raging fire? What do you think, do anything for ya?[/quote]

Ron Paul doesn’t believe in saving orphans from a raging inferno - as self-empowered individuals, the orphans are themselves responsible for pulling themselves out of the flaming carnage. If Ron Paul swoops in and saves them, then they come to feel entitled to being saved from burning wreckage in the future. We can’t be having that - they already wards of the state. If we don’t teach them now, when will they learn?

Or, in the alternative, market forces would intervene - if the orphans place a value in not burning to death, they will offer up something of alternative value to Ron Paul in exchange for being saved. In the 5-15 minute window they realize being seared isn’t within their hierarchy of wants, the orphans should begin to look around to find something that Ron Paul wants so as to start a negotiation to purchase Ron Paul’s services - like half burned teddy bears or a charred shoe.

With a caveat - if the orphans be black, gay, or Jewish: sit back and watch them burn and send the pics via cell phone to Lew Rockwell.

[quote]thunderbolt23 wrote:
Sloth wrote:

Hmm. How about a youtube video of Ron Paul saving 30 orphans single-handedly from a raging fire? What do you think, do anything for ya?

Ron Paul doesn’t believe in saving orphans from a raging inferno - as self-empowered individuals, the orphans are themselves responsible for pulling themselves out of the flaming carnage. If Ron Paul swoops in and saves them, then they come to feel entitled to being saved from burning wreckage in the future. We can’t be having that - they already wards of the state. If we don’t teach them now, when will they learn?

Or, in the alternative, market forces would intervene - if the orphans place a value in not burning to death, they will offer up something of alternative value to Ron Paul in exchange for being saved. In the 5-15 minute window they realize being seared isn’t within their hierarchy of wants, the orphans should begin to look around to find something that Ron Paul wants so as to start a negotiation to purchase Ron Paul’s services - like half burned teddy bears or a charred shoe.

With a caveat - if the orphans be black, gay, or Jewish: sit back and watch them burn and send the pics via cell phone to Lew Rockwell. [/quote]

Brilliant.

[quote]hazarddude334 wrote:
some one intrested in a certain candidate[/quote]

Actually I’m a Hillary fan. If I were old enough to vote (I’m only eleventeen) I would put an X next to her name for sure.

A woman with that much power is simply dreamy… I’d love to get inside of her oval office!

[quote]thunderbolt23 wrote:
Sloth wrote:

Hmm. How about a youtube video of Ron Paul saving 30 orphans single-handedly from a raging fire? What do you think, do anything for ya?

Ron Paul doesn’t believe in saving orphans from a raging inferno - as self-empowered individuals, the orphans are themselves responsible for pulling themselves out of the flaming carnage. If Ron Paul swoops in and saves them, then they come to feel entitled to being saved from burning wreckage in the future. We can’t be having that - they already wards of the state. If we don’t teach them now, when will they learn?

Or, in the alternative, market forces would intervene - if the orphans place a value in not burning to death, they will offer up something of alternative value to Ron Paul in exchange for being saved. In the 5-15 minute window they realize being seared isn’t within their hierarchy of wants, the orphans should begin to look around to find something that Ron Paul wants so as to start a negotiation to purchase Ron Paul’s services - like half burned teddy bears or a charred shoe.

With a caveat - if the orphans be black, gay, or Jewish: sit back and watch them burn and send the pics via cell phone to Lew Rockwell. [/quote]

Issues?

[quote]Jason32 wrote:
hazarddude334 wrote:
some one intrested in a certain candidate

Actually I’m a Hillary fan. If I were old enough to vote (I’m only eleventeen) I would put an X next to her name for sure.

A woman with that much power is simply dreamy… I’d love to get inside of her oval office![/quote]

Someone here (Pat36 I think) wants to ass-fist her. Then he’d know her screams were real.

I would never cheat on my wife but ramming it into that bitch’s ass and making her squeal like the pig she is would be a treat.

Headhunter is that you?

[quote]thunderbolt23 wrote:
Sloth wrote:

Hmm. How about a youtube video of Ron Paul saving 30 orphans single-handedly from a raging fire? What do you think, do anything for ya?

Ron Paul doesn’t believe in saving orphans from a raging inferno - as self-empowered individuals, the orphans are themselves responsible for pulling themselves out of the flaming carnage. If Ron Paul swoops in and saves them, then they come to feel entitled to being saved from burning wreckage in the future. We can’t be having that - they already wards of the state. If we don’t teach them now, when will they learn?

Or, in the alternative, market forces would intervene - if the orphans place a value in not burning to death, they will offer up something of alternative value to Ron Paul in exchange for being saved. In the 5-15 minute window they realize being seared isn’t within their hierarchy of wants, the orphans should begin to look around to find something that Ron Paul wants so as to start a negotiation to purchase Ron Paul’s services - like half burned teddy bears or a charred shoe.

With a caveat - if the orphans be black, gay, or Jewish: sit back and watch them burn and send the pics via cell phone to Lew Rockwell. [/quote]

This from the man that feels Fred Thompson would be a much more viable choice. Nuff said.

What a fucking awesome photo.

That baby is obviously a Republican.

[quote]Headhunter wrote:

Issues?[/quote]

Parody - a work that imitates another work in order to ridicule, ironically comment on, or poke some affectionate fun at the work itself, the subject of the work, the author or fictional voice of the parody - look into it.

[quote]storey420 wrote:

This from the man that feels Fred Thompson would be a much more viable choice. Nuff said.[/quote]

Heh - it’s always a little funny and a little sad when Paulnuts get their feelers hurt.

And I would avoid using “Ron Paul” and “viable” in the same sentence as a defense - you can like or dislike candidates as you please, but never suggest Paul was “viable” for any national office.