After showing my girlfriend pictures of Gina and Jelena… she claimed that they both had (undeniably) fake breasts. as an aerobics instructor herself, she thinks that it is damn near impossible for females to get their bf down that low without sacrificing bobbie.
is this true??? does anyone know???
say it isn’t so… is it not possible to get fit whilst keeping the (desirable) fat?
While it’s true that women will lose some breast size when getting bf down to low levels, they will not lose all of their boobs. I have seen lean women with still decent sized natural tatas. It sounds like jealousy to me. Just like saying a muscular, lean guy is on steroids.
Breasts are mostly made of fat, so when women get very lean, they lose most, if not all, of their breast size. How this affects a woman is very individual though, some lose more, some less, again depending on how lean they become. You really shouldn’t make sweeping generalizations, however many fitness models do appear to have implants.
When you’re talking about fitness models, especially when they’re so lean that they’re in competition shape, and they still have these C-sized funbags, then yes, unequivocally they are bolt-ons.
Not that there’s anything wrong with that – I for one like a well-done bolt-on job.
[quote]dollarbill44 wrote:
While it’s true that women will lose some breast size when getting bf down to low levels, they will not lose all of their boobs. I have seen lean women with still decent sized natural tatas. It sounds like jealousy to me. Just like saying a muscular, lean guy is on steroids.
What would happen to a woman with D or larger breasts that lowers their bodyfat significantly??? Will the breasts become smaller and “perkier” or will they turn into nipple pointed to the ground, saggy flapjacks???
[quote]TheSicilian wrote:
What would happen to a woman with D or larger breasts that lowers their bodyfat significantly??? Will the breasts become smaller and “perkier” or will they turn into nipple pointed to the ground, saggy flapjacks??? [/quote]
Uhhh…you KNOW the answer. They definately don’t get any “Perkier”.
seems like commenting on appearance is the norm here. i didn’t perceive any negativity in the post. i think she looks great, though I agree that she appears to have had some work done. seems like this is a “white elephant” issue…
[quote]Jillybop wrote:
I think that’s a little rude considering Gina and Jelena post here, don’t you?
[/quote]
It’s rude to talk about the body parts of a fitness model? What am I missing?
It may not be the body part they really want to bring attention to, but they’re not a couple of hand models. I think that to make it as a model, you have to have a pretty thick skin.
I’ve dated a few girls with fakies, and aside from the obvious traits, a large space in the middle of the chest between boobs is a dead giveaway.Unless the girl is a genetic freak, if she’s 5’8 115lbs with perky 34c’s+ she’s sporting fakies. And for the record, there’s not many genetic freaks out there.