[quote]jmacsr wrote:
Thanx for responding Brook, the reason for using winstrol is to reduce water retention gained by the dbol and of coarse cutting at end of cycle.[/quote]
It is not really too productive to design cycles that incorporate a bulking and a cutting portion, this is a technique best kept separate.
I am actually a fan of using a non aromatising anabolic after a drug like dbol… but this is covered with the test/deca being run after the dbol is finished. The winny is pointless IMO, and i am actually in the camp that belioeves that winstrol will not build any noticeable muscle unless you are 4-8%bodyfat, and then only at a minimum of 50mg/day… and also that it is toxic so needs to be run no longer than 6 weeks - which includes any other toxic orals.
Saying all this, winstrol is a useful ancillary drug IMO. So as an anti progesterone and also as a strong SHBG binding anabolic.
[quote]
And yes it would be deca-durabolin.
What do you think about the hcg mid-cycle, and do you think that 500iu is too much?[/quote]
I think that a dose of either; 100mg/d, 150mgEOD or 250mg3x/wk is an effective amount to stimualte the leydigs to prevent atrophy of the testes (only a single part of HPTA suppression and not the most major one) with little to no further suppression via negative feedback. What i mean is test is test, whjether it is in a vial, from the testes or what the fuck. If you shoot 50mg test vs. 500mg test, the negative feedback will be proportionate. As will the effects.
If you shoot 100iu of HCG (read LH) vs. 1000iu, you get the same effect… a smaller release of test vs. a massive release. the massive release will have a greater amount binding to the aromatase enzyme thus telling the HPTA it is unnessary. 100iu will still cause a release of testosterone, preventing the atrophy, but a much smaller release so there will be a massively smaller aromatisation level.
Daily or EOD doses of this amount will be a steady supply of “lh” that will prevent atrophy of the testes just fine and give much less or no suppression.[quote]
Well by using nolva I can’t use letrozole or armidix because it will reduce blood plasma levels in them so that’s why I use aromasin with the nolva.[/quote]
You can use them. I am not aware of the knowledge you are actually displaying - what i mean to say is, why does nolvadex reduce the blood plasma levels of arimidex or letrozole? ALSO, aromasin is perfectly fine as an AI and is preferred by many. What i meant by the statement to which you reply is that it is not necessary to use an AI and a SERM during a PCT of your design. One or the other would be fine.
It is often very beneficail to taper the test in some manner when using a Nandrolone product IMO, but if not a nolvadex 40/40/20/20 would be fine IMPE.[quote]
If you had to change this PCT what would you do considering the cycle?[/quote]
Depending on your age and experience i would either use a 40/40/20/20 or prisoners stasis taper outlined in the sticky.
Brook