Well your not gonna see as much as a longer cycle, but as soon as I’d start seeing something the cycle would end, then during the two weeks “off” before the next one they would disappear. I don’t think I even gained 5 pounds after all 3, not lean mass that is.
The reason I like 2 weekers are plateau busting. When you’ve been grinding away at a specific weight for months on end with no progress it’s frustrating. Change diet, try another program for 6 months, etc. I’m not in official sanctioned competitions, so I have no hangups about running a two weeker on and off for 6 weeks.
It may not be the most ideal if you’re looking to pack on quality pounds of muscle but if you want to dabble before making teh big commit it’s a great way to get your feet wet and the least inhibiting to your endocrine system.
i’ve been doing some reading elsewhere about short cycles, and one of the big draws is the general health aspect…
…keeping cholesterol in check (and not requiring as long of PCT, which is just as hard on lipids), as well as overall organ health and faster HPTA rebound…
SIM37 and cycobushmaster,
Do you guys feel the test prop 100mg/d days 1-10, dbol 50 mg/d days 1-14 plus nolva pct, is the safest first cycle if a guy was to do a 2 week cycle as his first?
I know tren ace is commonly used in 2 weekers and Bill Roberts had tren ace and dbol in his case study but the hype and likely reality of the harshness of tren ace makes a guy weary of ever wanting to do it.