Ex-Gf Left Me, "Still Loves Me." Help?

Absolutely it can … but so can the other side of that coin … if there’s a stay at home wife or w/e then that means there’s a single earner putting in effort to make sure the family can finance their lifestyle etc which can also be taken for granted.

Both rolls are difficult because they require sacrifice and effort beyond oneself … but it’s not always the case where one is being taken for granted … I’m not even sure exactly how prevalent that is tbh … it seems pervasive I think due to the narrative we see in media but in practice who knows?

As an opposite to what you saw with your mom, my uncle is the sole income earner and my aunt stays at home with the kids and it doesn’t seem that either is being taken for granted.

2 Likes

It depends on the girl, they aren’t all the same. Some want money, some want dick, some want love, and so on. Some girls will definitely leave their man for another guy who can fuck better.

1 Like

It’s feminist indoctrination. Cooperation with men is oppression. It’s men who are dying in wars, working in coal mines, and picking up trash, but for some reason they aren’t oppressed.

1 Like

The question that arises is how does she know it’s better unless she is sampling it. Once she’s sampling, that’s a different story.

Obviously they would be sampling in that case. Unless you just can’t satisfy her.

Not saying you’re wrong, but if that’s the case they’re missing the fucking point of life imo … we are a cooperative species, a bit of chaos and order … masculine and feminine … balance

I also find it ironic that what seems to be considered as feminist isn’t producing feminine qualities but they seem to exhibit what they call toxic masculinity

1 Like

yes

gender neutrality

Fools errand

Not with misanthropy!

1 Like

That’s been your strategy all along eh? Noice

1 Like

It’s the only real equality.

Oh yeah I agree.

Not that I’m saying one instance is worse off than the other. I realize for the most part balance can be found within the household, and typically is.

But I was just saying I can understand where some women are coming from, on the notion of being wary when it comes to that whole “house wife” status.

Same goes for the gentlelads.

Granted television and media don’t do much to help with it.

1 Like

Well, none of those are examples of oppression.

1 Like

Some even examples of inequality, as women had to campaign and petition for military entry in the first place, and then for being able to serve in combat zones.

1 Like

I suspect this thread is going to take a particular conversational turn.

I dunno: I feel like it’s the true conversational checkmate.

If you’re a misogynist, do you want women to go to warzones, where they stand a greater chance of encountering fatality, or do you want them out of warzones as a means of oppressing them?

Once again why I say misanthropy makes things far less messy.

1 Like

Checkmate indeed. Props, for stifling what could have been a 100+ post epic before it even started.

Keeping women out of combat is a form of oppression?

I used the term inequality, rather than oppression. The latter term becomes difficult to determine.

EDIT: Although I realize I used “oppress” in the second response, but at that point tongue is already firmly in cheek.

I guess inequality is accurate. In this case, I think inequality is actually a good thing for pretty much everyone.

1 Like