[quote]YamatoDamashii92 wrote:
You seem to think that if the government uses tax money that you would have to pay anyway, for healthcare that is your only option for healthcare. You can go private and use non government healthcare.[/quote]
So you mean I could have the luxury of lower overall take home pay, as tax rates in Europe are ass raping high, AND pay for quality non-government controlled healthcare too?
Golly Gee, where do I sign up?
No. I want my government and my doctor’s visits very much separate outside of some sort of standard measure that:
a) The doctor isn’t a quack and qualified
b) The doctor can’t share my info with anyone, including the government
c) The medications the doctor uses isn’t poison and if it is I have recourse in the courts.
^That is shit I don’t mind paying for. I DO mind paying for some unelected bureaucrat deciding what procedures and medications are worthwhile given some “data set”. I’m not a statistic, and that person isn’t my keeper.
You’re reading tone that isn’t there. I just write this way.
[quote]You say you are not opposed to taxation:
“The US federal price tag for the Iraq war including an estimate for veterans’ medical and disability costs into the future is about $2.2 trillion dollars. The cost for both Iraq and Afghanistan/Pakistan is going to be close to $4.4 trillion, not including future interest costs on borrowing for the wars.”
That could of paid for healthcare. The taxes are already there for free healthcare, no need to raise them. It is mismanagement of the money that is already paid.[/quote]
I’m done responding to “but bush” or “but Iraq war”. I’m not playing that game today, nor likely tomorrow.
