All I have to say is fuck you all If you can not have a discussion that disagrees with your point of view , you have a little penis , OH I mean mind
[/quote]
You are certainly entitled to your own point of view.
You cannot have your own facts, however. Facts are facts.[/quote]
To consider some of my points , try these .
(1)Attacking Israel is a kin to attacking Jesus and this is why mixing Religion and policy , a bad thing .
(2) Palestine has no voice other than the so called liberal media that is being totally dismissed . ( NO MONEY = NO SPEECH )
All I have to say is fuck you all If you can not have a discussion that disagrees with your point of view , you have a little penis , OH I mean mind
[/quote]
You are certainly entitled to your own point of view.
You cannot have your own facts, however. Facts are facts.[/quote]
To consider some of my points , try these .
(1)Attacking Israel is a kin to attacking Jesus and this is why mixing Religion and policy , a bad thing .
(2) Palestine has no voice other than the so called liberal media that is being totally dismissed . ( NO MONEY = NO SPEECH )
[/quote]
The Nazarine you mention is not particularly important to Jewish people. And I am not sure what the Christian religion has to do with a genocidal arabs who like to lob missles as schools.
The arabs have more money than Israel. Look up the word “oil.”
The MSM is being dismissed because (finally) people can see they lie constantly. Even the MSM, with all their powers of propaganda, can’t make the arab side — that defends its missiles with civilians — look good against the Israeli side — that defends its civilians against missiles.
All I have to say is fuck you all If you can not have a discussion that disagrees with your point of view , you have a little penis , OH I mean mind
[/quote]
You are certainly entitled to your own point of view.
You cannot have your own facts, however. Facts are facts.[/quote]
To consider some of my points , try these .
(1)Attacking Israel is a kin to attacking Jesus and this is why mixing Religion and policy , a bad thing .
(2) Palestine has no voice other than the so called liberal media that is being totally dismissed . ( NO MONEY = NO SPEECH )
[/quote]
The Nazarine you mention is not particularly important to Jewish people. And I am not sure what the Christian religion has to do with a genocidal arabs who like to lob missles as schools.
The arabs have more money than Israel. Look up the word “oil.”
The MSM is being dismissed because (finally) people can see they lie constantly. Even the MSM, with all their powers of propaganda, can’t make the arab side — that defends its missiles with civilians — look good against the Israeli side — that defends its civilians against missiles. [/quote]
on (1) Bill Maher said the biggest lobby for Israel is the American Evangelical
(2) The Arabs do not want Gaza any more than does Israel
Protip: If you want to be taken seriously, these words should be followed by mocking, not used as a resource to confirm your assertion.
Protip 2: Cowards like Maher (and Jon Stewart) who deflect and explain away their obnoxious, disrespectful, biased and hate ridden propaganda under the umbrella of “I’m a comedian” aren’t really authoritative sources for information.
At least people like Limbaugh and Hannity have the integrity to not hide from their statements with childish copouts of “I’m an entertainer and a comedian, satire.”
Protip: If you want to be taken seriously, these words should be followed by mocking, not used as a resource to confirm your assertion.
Protip 2: Cowards like Maher (and Jon Stewart) who deflect and explain away their obnoxious, disrespectful, biased and hate ridden propaganda under the umbrella of “I’m a comedian” aren’t really authoritative sources for information.
At least people like Limbaugh and Hannity have the integrity to not hide from their statements with childish copouts of “I’m an entertainer and a comedian, satire.”[/quote]
I know people here don’t like Maher and yes Limpdick and Hannity have integrity eye roll
What exactly was the point of this link? Do you think the people in this discussion are unaware of the pro-Israeli lobby? Or are you insinuating the pro-Israeli lobby is as bad as, say, the AFL-CIO lobby?
What exactly was the point of this link? Do you think the people in this discussion are unaware of the pro-Israeli lobby? Or are you insinuating the pro-Israeli lobby is as bad as, say, the AFL-CIO lobby?
[/quote]
No pitt is just continuing is inconsistent stance of “lobbies I agree with are A-OK, ones I don’t are evil and shoud be banned.”
So you know, being a typical Contemporary American Liberal.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
So… lobbies are suddenly super different than they ever were, and the Koch brothers and their companies only employ a handful of people.
Oh and this just in: statements without context are used to try and make someone look like a racist.
Riveting stuff here. [/quote]
Koch employees would be better represented by Unions
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
So… lobbies are suddenly super different than they ever were, and the Koch brothers and their companies only employ a handful of people.
Oh and this just in: statements without context are used to try and make someone look like a racist.
Riveting stuff here. [/quote]
Koch employees would be better represented by Unions
[/quote]
I don’t believe this for a second. One of my best friends is a union pipeline special representative. The ironic thing is, which he no longer will talk to me about because I have beaten him up mercilessly, as a special representative he is an at-will employee. So, although he organizes on behalf for a union he is not protected by the union. Unions care only about the amount of money they can bring in for their own use just like any lobby group only they have fooled their members into thinking they give a rats ass about them.
The difference between Union lobbies and Koch Industries Lobby is one represents 18 million people and the other a hand full of people.
[/quote]
Having been (briefly) a union member who tried to bring a complaint via the shop warden about a druggie who nearly got me and several other guys killed, I know personally that modern labor unions represent no one but the handful of people in charge of the union.
Did unions have their place, at one time? Yes.
Should the right to unionize remain? Yes.
Are the present unions anything more than a money gathering system for those at the top? No.
The difference between Union lobbies and Koch Industries Lobby is one represents 18 million people and the other a hand full of people.
[/quote]
Having been (briefly) a union member who tried to bring a complaint via the shop warden about a druggie who nearly got me and several other guys killed, I know personally that modern labor unions represent no one but the handful of people in charge of the union.
Did unions have their place, at one time? Yes.
Should the right to unionize remain? Yes.
Are the present unions anything more than a money gathering system for those at the top? No.
[/quote]
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
So… lobbies are suddenly super different than they ever were, and the Koch brothers and their companies only employ a handful of people.
Oh and this just in: statements without context are used to try and make someone look like a racist.
Riveting stuff here. [/quote]
Koch employees would be better represented by Unions
[/quote]
I don’t believe this for a second. One of my best friends is a union pipeline special representative. The ironic thing is, which he no longer will talk to me about because I have beaten him up mercilessly, as a special representative he is an at-will employee. So, although he organizes on behalf for a union he is not protected by the union. Unions care only about the amount of money they can bring in for their own use just like any lobby group only they have fooled their members into thinking they give a rats ass about them.
[/quote]
nothing is perfect , your friend may not talk to you because , I don’t know Could it be because your a dick LOLZ just kidding too good to pass up
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
Union workers on average make 27% more than Non Union [/quote]
You mean like the ones who are large part of the reason GM bankrupt, and will ultimately be responsible for their own demise because they are narrowing the gap between themselves and the cost of the machine that will replace them??
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
Union workers on average make 27% more than Non Union [/quote]
You mean like the ones who are large part of the reason GM bankrupt, and will ultimately be responsible for their own demise because they are narrowing the gap between themselves and the cost of the machine that will replace them??[/quote]
If you can not have a discussion that disagrees with your point of view , you have a little penis , OH I mean mind 