I don’t know why you would think that. It’s the same reason people use primo. Just a cheaper not as refined version. An anabolic is an anabolic. They have different characteristics. At the end of the day, a Mg of an an anabolic is still going to push anabolism. You don’t need to put broscience in there saying all it does is harden you up. That wouldn’t make any sense. Plenty of Studies in research of it being very anabolic at clinical low doses.
Such as what. Besides, primobolan which wouldn’t be better cost effectively and is commonly just faked with Masteron or test test prop anyway.
To suggest higher EQ would give higher EQ sides and more risk. To give a different compound or higher Deca would give more risk for prolactin, higher test estrogen conversion and higher for prolactin. Hey eyes are there for on hand. But if you’re dosing AIS so frequently through a week those could be detrimental to your health/ lipids as well. To use something such as Master on and EQ to control estrogen. And not use a high dosage of a compound such as Deca that causes increased prolactin. I’m not trying to demonalize prolactin, but if there’s other things, other paths you can use that still cause anabalism and a mediate other estrogen side effects as well.
Ok, so you asked a question and I gave you an answer. Obviously it was not what you wanted to hear.
Using mast and EQ as estrogen control is not something i would do in my opinion. I would use something like Aromison to stop the estrogen conversion as it is a suicided AI inhibitor.
You know your body so do what’s best for you.
As has been said, there are better anabolic compounds than mast. Will it build muscle? Sure. But not as well as nandrolone for instance.
Yes, but not as anabolic as other compounds, mg for mg.
How do you know your prolactin would increase? Have you had this problem using deca before? I haven’t.
You’re planning on injecting nearly 2 grams of steroids per week and you’re worried what 0.5mg of arimidex or cabergoline might do to your lipids profile? Seriously?
This is unnecessary and rude. You asked for opinions in your original post. Instead of thanking them for taking the time to respond like a mature person would, you found your feelings hurt because someone is opposed to your proposition/plan and decide to show it by acting like a little bitch.
Masteron is great to pair with testosterone for non competitors. It allows you to get the full effects of higher estrogen, minus the gynecomastia. Its relationship with estrogen is very different than primobolan or EQ. It’s also great at increasing libido and general well being too.
EQ is a no go for me and some others, since it can really raise hematocrit. It can also really aggravate anxiety, and take a long time for these side effects to go away upon cessation due to its long ester half life. If anything, I’d say for these reasons, EQ is a drug I’d classify as a competitor drug, not masteron.
Nandrolone vs mast, is like saying high sides vs none. So yeah I wonder why one would suggest it. Overall Mg is more effective than compound selection.
This is very common with nandrolone in general. You may have not noticed but it’s one of the main reasons for anxiety, sleep deficiency, mood swings, prolactin and cortisol go hand and hand.
The side effects of arimidex and caber effect more than just lipids, if you have any noticsble side effects and just live with them because your “on cycle” and that’s “normal” then you don’t know how to manage your cycle.
Opinions are useful, if you take factual knowledge into them. But to spew nonsense and claim truth is what hurts the forums.
Masteron yes is kinda basic, but the basics are the most useful such as test is best guys.
I’m a active competitor. And never placed under 2nd. Im not trying to bring ego and physique into this, but it’s the mindless listening to the way someone looks rather than knowledge hurts industry.