deadlift, that is a relatively good point and one that we have tried to address. Meal frequency is not as simple as more = better. That pretty much sums up pages of arguement, and I don’t think its debatable.
/thread
[quote]danchubb wrote:
Ok mate, I’ve tried to be nice about this but you’re being a dickhead for no reason.
Grow up, learn to think critically and not just believe some nonsense you hear bandied about the gym, learn some manners, and feel free to never address me again. I have no idea how old you are but you act like you’re about 4 years old and someone just took your candy. Somethings you DO need to experience. But that’s not what’s up for debate. What was originally discussed wasn’t what you seem to have perceived it to be. What was stated was that more frequency doesn’t offer any significant benefit over less. You somehow read that as less frequency is better.
Learn to read, learn to debate, and learn to stop being a retard.[/quote]
Keep reading about lifting and posting online all day. I’ll keep lifting so that I never have to look like you. Deal? Maybe next you can read about how to play quarterback and then you can go out and give some pro quarterbacks some advice.
Just throw up one pic so I can see how much you have learned being on this site for years.
Maybe next time you can read a book on etiquette, logic, and critical thinking, and you won’t clutter up this board with idiocy and inane comments. You are truly a prototypical meathead, and give us all a bad name. You should be ashamed.
[quote]danchubb wrote:
Maybe next time you can read a book on etiquette, logic, and critical thinking, and you won’t clutter up this board with idiocy and inane comments. You are truly a prototypical meathead, and give us all a bad name. You should be ashamed. [/quote]
yes, you are right. He should just listen to you and stop posting. Get outta here
/sarcasm
[quote]danchubb wrote:
Maybe next time you can read a book on etiquette, logic, and critical thinking, and you won’t clutter up this board with idiocy and inane comments. You are truly a prototypical meathead, and give us all a bad name. You should be ashamed. [/quote]
Wait who is US? I lift weights and have muscle, since when did you become a part of that group?
All on this board? All who lift weights? All who - dare I say - aspire to gain size? Clearly you missed the memo for this particular site… ‘The Intelligent and Relentless Pursuit of Muscle’. Unforfunately, you are relentlessly unintelligent. Save your rubbish comments and snide remarks for somewhere they are more appreciated - all I’ve seen from you is trite comments and an inability to acknowledge your loss of an arguement. I’m going to bed; til next time.
I think you meant “argument”, that’s ok, very common misspelling. Come back tomorrow for more lessons.
[quote]Gillium-001 wrote:
FLAME WAR!
I got my money on the buff guy.
(sits back, chomps on popcorn)[/quote]
just make sure you split that up into 6 meals
[quote]jb99 wrote:
I think you meant “argument”, that’s ok, very common misspelling. Come back tomorrow for more lessons.[/quote]
Yes, arguement is a common misspelling of argument. Misspellings like mispellings and misspelings, are so benign that usually they serve only as a criticizing point for people who can’t argue arguments, but are switching their focus to these ‘fundamental’ flaws in your character.
[quote]jb99 wrote:
Just throw up one pic so I can see how much you have learned being on this site for years.[/quote]
wow, you’re a fast learner aren’t you?
whatever, this thread has descended from semi-intelligent debate to an e-motional cat fight.
i’m outty (for hopefully the last time)
[quote]BulletproofTiger wrote:
jb99 wrote:
I think you meant “argument”, that’s ok, very common misspelling. Come back tomorrow for more lessons.
Yes, arguement is a common misspelling of argument. Misspellings like mispellings and misspelings, are so benign that usually they serve only as a criticizing point for people who can’t argue arguments, but are switching their focus to these ‘fundamental’ flaws in your character. [/quote]
Sorry that I felt the need to correct the poster, I only want the best for him. And I want the best for you too, so how about we devise a workout and nutrition plan for you?
[quote]JMoUCF87 wrote:
jb99 wrote:
Just throw up one pic so I can see how much you have learned being on this site for years.
wow, you’re a fast learner aren’t you?
whatever, this thread has descended from semi-intelligent debate to an e-motional cat fight.
i’m outty (for hopefully the last time)[/quote]
Nobody asked you to come back and post, you did that on your own. GO LIFT ALREADY WILL YA!
[quote]jb99 wrote:
BulletproofTiger wrote:
jb99 wrote:
I think you meant “argument”, that’s ok, very common misspelling. Come back tomorrow for more lessons.
Yes, arguement is a common misspelling of argument. Misspellings like mispellings and misspelings, are so benign that usually they serve only as a criticizing point for people who can’t argue arguments, but are switching their focus to these ‘fundamental’ flaws in your character.
Sorry that I felt the need to correct the poster, I only want the best for him. And I want the best for you too, so how about we devise a workout and nutrition plan for you?[/quote]
I’m totally open to suggestions. I have a training log at Forums - T Nation - The World's Trusted Community for Elite Fitness
well, this thread went downhill fast
G87, I wasn’t going to bother with this thread anymore but I was browsing CTs thread and saw this:
[quote] Christian Thibaudeau:
Show me ONE study that shows that having more than 3 hours between meals is detrimental. THERE ARE NONE!!!
Actually recent studies have been showing no difference between ingesting the same amount of nutrients over 3 meals versus over 5-6 meals. [/quote]
Thought as you were the OP it might interest you.
Best,
Dan
[quote]danchubb wrote:
G87, I wasn’t going to bother with this thread anymore but I was browsing CTs thread and saw this:
Christian Thibaudeau:
Show me ONE study that shows that having more than 3 hours between meals is detrimental. THERE ARE NONE!!!
Actually recent studies have been showing no difference between ingesting the same amount of nutrients over 3 meals versus over 5-6 meals.
Thought as you were the OP it might interest you.
Best,
Dan[/quote]
Thanks a lot for bringing this up, Dan. Good to know that CT is behind me, figuratively speaking 
No worries man. The real point to note is that he says ‘same amount of nutrients’; often people eating say 5000 cals per day will have trouble getting that into 2-3 meals; 5-6 beaing easier for them to handle. But barring such a large amount of calories, or leaving it aside, it seems that ~3 meals is fine. Some have even said that it’s better.
[quote]danchubb wrote:
G87, I wasn’t going to bother with this thread anymore but I was browsing CTs thread and saw this:
Christian Thibaudeau:
Show me ONE study that shows that having more than 3 hours between meals is detrimental. THERE ARE NONE!!!
Actually recent studies have been showing no difference between ingesting the same amount of nutrients over 3 meals versus over 5-6 meals.
Thought as you were the OP it might interest you.
Best,
Dan[/quote]
yeah but let’s see his PICS!!!1
/end troll-baiting
[quote]JMoUCF87 wrote:
danchubb wrote:
G87, I wasn’t going to bother with this thread anymore but I was browsing CTs thread and saw this:
Christian Thibaudeau:
Show me ONE study that shows that having more than 3 hours between meals is detrimental. THERE ARE NONE!!!
Actually recent studies have been showing no difference between ingesting the same amount of nutrients over 3 meals versus over 5-6 meals.
Thought as you were the OP it might interest you.
Best,
Dan
yeah but let’s see his PICS!!!1
/end troll-baiting[/quote]
CT has pics, right? I would say he has a very impressive phsyique as well, so I dont really get this comment.