Save your shit for somebody else. My original post in this thread was mostly a joke, if anything.
So you are the sexual-moral police with no religious implications.
You are a physiatrist’s wet dream.[/quote]
Oh, I missed this gem too.
Please explain how morality needs to have religious implications on an individual basis.
I was raised by agnostic parents and I’ve thought people were disgusting for promiscuity since a rather young age. I’ve always felt it was wrong. Christ did not convince me of this. Nor did Mohammed. Nor did anybody or anything except gut feelings of my OWN and thoughts of my OWN.
Sorry for misreading you…usually anger and fear of human sexuality is programmed by religion. If you were disgusted by sex since an early age, that is clearly not the case.
I am sorry that people having sex is disgusting to you, that must really suck (no pun intended).
Sorry for misreading you…usually anger and fear of human sexuality is programmed by religion. If you were disgusted by sex since an early age, that is clearly not the case.
I am sorry that people having sex is disgusting to you, that must really suck (no pun intended).
[/quote]
Sex is not disgusting to me.
I think it can be a very special thing and a very fun thing.
Again, what I find disgusting is having that large of a number of sexual partners.
I would never be like that and obviously I would expect the same from my wife (in which case, I win). I would also never surround myself with people who are promiscuous. But that is just me.
If you want to have 20 different partners a year… that is your choice. Just make sure you use condoms and get STI screenings every now and then , please.
I like how you took what I said to him for your FJM style breakdown…but I get it…you want to justify your sad little opinion of a girl.
[/quote]
FJM? But no, I’m not looking for justification any more than you.
LOL. No, you’ve taken upon yourself to condescendingly attack and degrade anyone who thinks what the girl did was wrong and make fun of their lifestyle in childish ways. YouÃ?¢??ve done much much more. “assbackward opinions” this is exactly the condescending judgment IÃ?¢??m talking about. You’ve done it in almost every post you’ve made.
Ok listen. I’ll type slowly so you can understand. Cut out the condescending bigoted judgmental crap about other people’s lifestyles it is beyond old. And who the hell said I wouldn’t love someone? This is a terrible strawman argument people not intelligent enough to follow the train of thought pursue.
Do you acknowledge that a woman doesn’t have to sleep around to be strong? And since YOU made the accusation about me, does it greatly affect your opinion of someone if they make the moral judgment to not sleep around? Cause it sounds like you are the one that has a problem here, not me.
No, you have attacked anyone that chooses a different lifestyle than you. No one has ever even mentioned that anyone doesn’t or should have the right to do anything. We’ve even mentioned that they do. You however, don’t have the right to claim other people don’t have a right to make moral judgments about people’s actions.
Lost in the argument again huh? No-one mentioned anything religious.
And you claimed to be one and claimed it wasn’t an insult. Would you like me to list out all the name calling you’ve done?
My one comment is her best lover was the guy who got off a long-term relationship and apparently attempted to use his one night stand to start a relationship with her, but she (for whatever reason) didn’t want to do that.
It stikes me that she has a fear of emotional intimacy, but a real need for intimacy, so she attempts to fill the void by having random cocks stuck into her.
This will work while she is in her 20s and vaguely hot, but a complete disaster thereafter, if not sooner.
[quote]Jewbacca wrote:
I read her report from front to back.
My one comment is her best lover was the guy who got off a long-term relationship and apparently attempted to use his one night stand to start a relationship with her, but she (for whatever reason) didn’t want to do that.
It stikes me that she has a fear of emotional intimacy, but a real need for intimacy, so she attempts to fill the void by having random cocks stuck into her.
This will work while she is in her 20s and vaguely hot, but a complete disaster thereafter, if not sooner.[/quote]
I see your point, but what if she did not want a relationship…what if she just wanted to have a no strings good time?
I still fail to see why guys fucking around do not let labeled as emotionally challenged, but women do.
[quote]Jewbacca wrote:
I read her report from front to back.
My one comment is her best lover was the guy who got off a long-term relationship and apparently attempted to use his one night stand to start a relationship with her, but she (for whatever reason) didn’t want to do that.
It stikes me that she has a fear of emotional intimacy, but a real need for intimacy, so she attempts to fill the void by having random cocks stuck into her.
This will work while she is in her 20s and vaguely hot, but a complete disaster thereafter, if not sooner.[/quote]
I see your point, but what if she did not want a relationship…what if she just wanted to have a no strings good time?
I still fail to see why guys fucking around do not let labeled as emotionally challenged, but women do.[/quote]
Because in a man’s mind theres an endless porno being played. We can’t help it.
[quote]Jewbacca wrote:
I read her report from front to back.
My one comment is her best lover was the guy who got off a long-term relationship and apparently attempted to use his one night stand to start a relationship with her, but she (for whatever reason) didn’t want to do that.
It stikes me that she has a fear of emotional intimacy, but a real need for intimacy, so she attempts to fill the void by having random cocks stuck into her.
This will work while she is in her 20s and vaguely hot, but a complete disaster thereafter, if not sooner.[/quote]
I see your point, but what if she did not want a relationship…what if she just wanted to have a no strings good time?
I still fail to see why guys fucking around do not let labeled as emotionally challenged, but women do.[/quote]
Because in a man’s mind theres an endless porno being played. We can’t help it.
[/quote]
So too with some women…it does not mean they are emotionally damaged.
[quote]Jewbacca wrote:
I read her report from front to back.
My one comment is her best lover was the guy who got off a long-term relationship and apparently attempted to use his one night stand to start a relationship with her, but she (for whatever reason) didn’t want to do that.
It stikes me that she has a fear of emotional intimacy, but a real need for intimacy, so she attempts to fill the void by having random cocks stuck into her.
This will work while she is in her 20s and vaguely hot, but a complete disaster thereafter, if not sooner.[/quote]
I see your point, but what if she did not want a relationship…what if she just wanted to have a no strings good time?
I still fail to see why guys fucking around do not let labeled as emotionally challenged, but women do.[/quote]
It takes a while for men to grow up, I think. And women are generally the gatekeepers because they have much more to lose biologically.
Sex is awesome. The best sex is with a committed spouse TRYING to have a baby or simply not caring if she gets pregnant because you love her so much you want her to have your children.
[quote]Jewbacca wrote:
I read her report from front to back.
My one comment is her best lover was the guy who got off a long-term relationship and apparently attempted to use his one night stand to start a relationship with her, but she (for whatever reason) didn’t want to do that.
It stikes me that she has a fear of emotional intimacy, but a real need for intimacy, so she attempts to fill the void by having random cocks stuck into her.
This will work while she is in her 20s and vaguely hot, but a complete disaster thereafter, if not sooner.[/quote]
I see your point, but what if she did not want a relationship…what if she just wanted to have a no strings good time?
I still fail to see why guys fucking around do not let labeled as emotionally challenged, but women do.[/quote]
It takes a while for men to grow up, I think. And women are generally the gatekeepers because they have much more to lose biologically.
Sex is awesome. The best sex is with a committed spouse TRYING to have a baby or simply not caring if she gets pregnant because you love her so much you want her to have your children. [/quote]
Again I see your point…but that is the best sex according to you. Not necessarily everybody else.
Committed relationship sex is awesome…but so is 3rd date sex…IMHO.
I still fail to see why guys fucking around do not let labeled as emotionally challenged, but women do.[/quote]
Depends on who is doing the labeling. Many women do consider a guy who fucks around, is self absorbed, or demonstrates many of the other goofball characteristics as immature (emotionally challenged).
What is wrong with have 13 partners in 4 years…I had more than that in college.[/quote]
I find that to be morally wrong. If you had more than that in college, then you are a whore. Whore.
[/quote]
Come on now, that’s a bit strong.
A whore has sex for money or profit.
Actually, hving researched it, most dictionaries seem to define ‘whore’ as anyone who has sex for personal gain. Since pleasure could be seen as ‘personal gain’, then doesn’t that make us ALL whores?
I admit to being in moral turpitude here, can someone help me out of my whore status, lol.
BBB[/quote]
Bushy…I’m afraid you are a whore. Now go strip down and let those ladies eat fruit off you.
