Duke Girl Publishes Report on Sex?

Off Topic
241

[quote]Jewbacca wrote:

[quote]anonym wrote:

Your playful attempts at pseudo-self-deprecation make me very wet, Jookie.[/quote]

I am not sure what you mean, but I think I do fine on the printed page. I would never try to have these conversations verbally; even though I’ve taken English since a child (and lived in Brookline, by the way), I literally sit with an English grammar book so I my posts do not read read like an illiterate.[/quote]

You do quite well on the printed page and I was sure you knew just that (which is why I enjoyed the idea of you attempting to downplay your grasp of English - which is, for the most part, well above that of many of the posters here who claim it as their primary language).

Usually, all your kind does is give throaty screams and shed on my carpet. So your posts tend to be a welcome change of pace.

242

I’ve known more than a couple dorks who are pretty lucky bastards because some wild child selected them when they decided it was time to settle down. I probably should count myself in that group.

243

[quote]krazykoukides wrote:

[quote]Dustin wrote:

[quote]krazykoukides wrote:

Actually, I was called out on calling somebody a whore.
[/quote]

When does a woman become a “whore”, as opposed to someone who just likes teh cock and enjoys sex?

Where do the draw the line?
[/quote]

Go away.[/quote]

Answer the question, please.

Question should read

“Where do you draw the line?”

I mean, she’s a filthy whore, right? So it should be easy to explain. I’ll patiently await your answer, which I’m sure will be well thought out and reasonable.

244

Before we get into the whole â??girls you date vs. girls you marryâ?? theory, did we ever address the slander issue?

How about the guys that named and discussed in detail? Unless they gave her permission to discuss, which I doubt they did, their reputations have been changed, either for the good or bad depending, without their consent. For that alone, the chick is bad news.

245

[quote]mud lark wrote:
Before we get into the whole â??girls you date vs. girls you marryâ?? theory, did we ever address the slander issue?

How about the guys that named and discussed in detail? Unless they gave her permission to discuss, which I doubt they did, their reputations have been changed, either for the good or bad depending, without their consent. For that alone, the chick is bad news.
[/quote]

I agree she used poor judgement letting that “report” get out but I don’t think those guys have grounds to pursue any kind of legal action.

246

[quote]Dustin wrote:

[quote]krazykoukides wrote:

[quote]Dustin wrote:

[quote]krazykoukides wrote:

Actually, I was called out on calling somebody a whore.
[/quote]

When does a woman become a “whore”, as opposed to someone who just likes teh cock and enjoys sex?

Where do the draw the line?
[/quote]

Go away.[/quote]

Answer the question, please.

Question should read

“Where do you draw the line?”

I mean, she’s a filthy whore, right? So it should be easy to explain. I’ll patiently await your answer, which I’m sure will be well thought out and reasonable.

[/quote]

No, I will not answer your question, just so you can pick it apart.

I have said enough in this thread already. You’re late to the party, GTFO.

247

[quote]mud lark wrote:
Before we get into the whole â??girls you date vs. girls you marryâ?? theory, did we ever address the slander issue?

How about the guys that named and discussed in detail? Unless they gave her permission to discuss, which I doubt they did, their reputations have been changed, either for the good or bad depending, without their consent. For that alone, the chick is bad news.
[/quote]

If she kept the dudes anonymous, it wouldn’t be a big deal. Posting their pictures without permission is definitely problematic.

If I found out some girl I hooked up with in college posted my picture claiming to have slept with me, I would be pissed.

If a girl I hooked up with wrote a summary of her sexual experiences with out implicating any of the parties involved, I would think it was funny.

Girls already go around sleeping with a lot more guys than this girl, and telling all their girlfriends about it. I think the pictures are where she crossed the line.

As to calling her a slut…I don’t know if that is the term I would use. She is far from lady-like, but girls are just as promiscuous as guys, and “slut” is a broad term.

248

[quote]krazykoukides wrote:

No, I will not answer your question, just so you can pick it apart.
[/quote]

Wise choice, as I’m sure your answer will be as retarded as everything else you have said in this thread.

Indeed.

[quote]
You’re late to the party, GTFO.[/quote]

Well, you are intimidating, all 5’2’’ of you. So I think I will heed your advice.

249

[quote]Dustin wrote:

[quote]krazykoukides wrote:

No, I will not answer your question, just so you can pick it apart.
[/quote]

Wise choice, as I’m sure your answer will be as retarded as everything else you have said in this thread.

Indeed.

[quote]
You’re late to the party, GTFO.[/quote]

Well, you are intimidating, all 5’2’’ of you. So I think I will heed your advice.[/quote]

I fail to see how you have contributed. But I think I get it. Aside from BugeishaAD, most of you who like multiple partners can only call me names and make huge assumptions about me.

Now please enjoy this weird ass music video.

250

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:
To all the guys on this thread calling her a whore…you are the worst kind of hypocrites…

Every single one of you would love to tap as many girls as this this gal bedded guys…and you would high-five all your Bro’s and be quite pleased with yourselves.

Absolutely NOTHING wrong with what this girl did…she had fun, the guys had fun…it’s COLLEGE for fucks sake, all you moral asshats need to get down off the high horse for a second.

This is the worst kind of double standard.
[/quote]

Not true. and there is plenty morally wrong with what this girl did. [/quote]

Well Double there is this lovely quote ^^^

Nothing like the moral judgement.
[/quote]

Hahahaa. really. are you this dumb? where are all the quotes of my repeated insults and condemnation?

i have claimed this whole thread to have made a moral judgment. exactly like everyone else wo has posted. the really funny part is that your part of the quote you posted is not only far more judgmental, but its also incredibly sexest and ignorant to boot.

even more than that, youll notice that my initial interaction was in responce to your moral judgments and claims contrary to your lies.

even further than that my original post was as much if not more in reference to the report as to the sex.

so let me see that would make you wrong about 5 different ways on this one.

try again, or dont if you prefer to quit making yourself look stupid.

how in the hell do you get off saying you are trying to battle a sexist mind set when you post sexist ignorant steryotypical garbage like that? your post was probably litterally the most sexist post on this thread. people like you are the worst of the hypocrites.

251

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:
To all the guys on this thread calling her a whore…you are the worst kind of hypocrites…

Every single one of you would love to tap as many girls as this this gal bedded guys…and you would high-five all your Bro’s and be quite pleased with yourselves.

Absolutely NOTHING wrong with what this girl did…she had fun, the guys had fun…it’s COLLEGE for fucks sake, all you moral asshats need to get down off the high horse for a second.

This is the worst kind of double standard.
[/quote]

Not true. and there is plenty morally wrong with what this girl did. [/quote]

Well Double there is this lovely quote ^^^

Nothing like the moral judgement.
[/quote]

Hahahaa. really. are you this dumb? where are all the quotes of my repeated insults and condemnation?

i have claimed this whole thread to have made a moral judgment. exactly like everyone else wo has posted. the really funny part is that your part of the quote you posted is not only far more judgmental, but its also incredibly sexest and ignorant to boot.

even more than that, youll notice that my initial interaction was in responce to your moral judgments and claims contrary to your lies.

even further than that my original post was as much if not more in reference to the report as to the sex.

so let me see that would make you wrong about 5 different ways on this one.

try again, or dont if you prefer to quit making yourself look stupid.

how in the hell do you get off saying you are trying to battle a sexist mind set when you post sexist ignorant steryotypical garbage like that? your post was probably litterally the most sexist post on this thread. people like you are the worst of the hypocrites.[/quote]

You asked me to quote the statement you made that was the most ignorant…so I did. The majority of your “witty” remarks were contained in long drawn out responses interspersed in my quotes, so picking them out would have taken all day.

I have moved on talking to you, as others have more to add to the discussion. You keep screaming that I am the ignorant sexist, but clearly that is not the case…put me on ignore if my responses irritate you that much.

252

[quote]Dustin wrote:

[quote]krazykoukides wrote:

No, I will not answer your question, just so you can pick it apart.
[/quote]

Wise choice, as I’m sure your answer will be as retarded as everything else you have said in this thread.

Indeed.

[quote]
You’re late to the party, GTFO.[/quote]

Well, you are intimidating, all 5’2’’ of you. So I think I will heed your advice.[/quote]

there was a responce here.

to sumarize:
she purposely avoided attachment

she had sex for alterior motives outside of the sex itself. (data collection)

i feel those things are wrong. (not condeming or claiming to be better for those liars out there). just stating how i feel about it.

where do you draw the line?

253

[quote]krazykoukides wrote:

I fail to see how you have contributed.
[/quote]

What have you contributed? Aside from calling people whores and boasting about your alleged moral superiority.

No, you acted like a self righteous A-hole, hence the name calling. I made no assumptions about you, I only commented on what you said.

If you don’t think it is “right” to have sex before marriage, fine. But don’t try to assume the moral high ground and make generalizations about people who do have sex before marriage.

254

[quote]Dustin wrote:

[quote]krazykoukides wrote:

I fail to see how you have contributed.
[/quote]

What have you contributed? Aside from calling people whores and boasting about your alleged moral superiority.

No, you acted like a self righteous A-hole, hence the name calling. I made no assumptions about you, I only commented on what you said.

If you don’t think it is “right” to have sex before marriage, fine. But don’t try to assume the moral high ground and make generalizations about people who do have sex before marriage.
[/quote]

Lol… you people just keep proving my point on assumptions.

Where did I say it is wrong to have sex before marriage? or infact, anything about sex before marriage at all?

Wait for it…

wait for it…

oh yeah, I never mentioned that! Not once!

255

llama, no. the question was not about ignorance it was about you backing up your claims about me. this is another outright lie. not only have you not provided a single quote to back up a single claim. you havent shown in any way how that quote even makes me ignorant.

ironically the quote you posted shows your ignorance and bigotry. you steryotyped a sex and made outragious claims about what every person in an entire gender wants and would act. that is sexism. that is ignorance.

you then went on to not only make a moral judgment but to effectively claim that your value system was the right one and that anyone disagreing is an idiot. that is you being ignorant and intolerant and judgmental.

oh the irony of you accusing me with that post.

and i will not ignore you. you arent making me mad. this is becoming comical. im enjoying pointing out your outragious lies and stupidity.

256

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
llama, no. the question was not about ignorance it was about you backing up your claims about me. this is another outright lie. not only have you not provided a single quote to back up a single claim. you havent shown in any way how that quote even makes me ignorant.

ironically the quote you posted shows your ignorance and bigotry. you steryotyped a sex and made outragious claims about what every person in an entire gender wants and would act. that is sexism. that is ignorance.

you then went on to not only make a moral judgment but to effectively claim that your value system was the right one and that anyone disagreing is an idiot. that is you being ignorant and intolerant and judgmental.

oh the irony of you accusing me with that post.

and i will not ignore you. you arent making me mad. this is becoming comical. im enjoying pointing out your outragious lies and stupidity.[/quote]

You have to be drinking right now…am I right?

I said the MAJORITY of gender specific traits, not EVERYBODY. Try and keep up.

I never said that ANYBODY who disagreed with me was an idiot, keep trying.

And trying the ol’ reversie psychological play of saying that I am intolerant for defending the rights of a women to act the same way as men, and be TREATED the same way…just smacks of desperation.

You will note that of all the people that have posted you are the only one who seems to think I am being the moral police. My claims are not ignorant, they are normal…you yourself admit that you judge women who have sex freely…so how can you point a finger at me?

You saying that a women has done something morally wrong by sleeping with multiple partners is just ignorant…and you jumping up and down calling me stupid, is not going to change that.

Sorry bud.

257

[quote]krazykoukides wrote:

[quote]Dustin wrote:

[quote]krazykoukides wrote:

I fail to see how you have contributed.
[/quote]

What have you contributed? Aside from calling people whores and boasting about your alleged moral superiority.

No, you acted like a self righteous A-hole, hence the name calling. I made no assumptions about you, I only commented on what you said.

If you don’t think it is “right” to have sex before marriage, fine. But don’t try to assume the moral high ground and make generalizations about people who do have sex before marriage.
[/quote]

Lol… you people just keep proving my point on assumptions.

Where did I say it is wrong to have sex before marriage? or infact, anything about sex before marriage at all?

Wait for it…

wait for it…

oh yeah, I never mentioned that! Not once![/quote]

For fuck’s sake, man. Go back and read your posts in this thread.

You made all sorts of generalizations and then try to play defense when called on your nonsense. You think what the girl did was wrong. DD feels the same. Awesome. No need for you to act high and mighty because you feel her actions were immoral.

Certainly you understand where I’m coming from?

258

no, you actually used the term every, not majority. lie 1.

no, there is nothing reversed about pointing out rapant hypocrisy. there is nothing reversed about sexism against men. lie 2.

no, you called people who disagreed asshats (and lots of other things in later posts) lie 3

no, my acusatons had nothing to do with anything about women. it had only to do with your ignorant accusations about men. lie 4

no, i have also argued and stated that i disagree with the different treatment of the sexes. i have been arguing they should be treated the same. lie 5

no, my judgments of the girls actions has nothing to do with her gender as ive stated over and over. lie 6 and 7

no, there is nothing ignorant in feeling something is wrong (having sex with random unattached people)

259

[quote]Dustin wrote:

[quote]krazykoukides wrote:

[quote]Dustin wrote:

[quote]krazykoukides wrote:

I fail to see how you have contributed.
[/quote]

What have you contributed? Aside from calling people whores and boasting about your alleged moral superiority.

No, you acted like a self righteous A-hole, hence the name calling. I made no assumptions about you, I only commented on what you said.

If you don’t think it is “right” to have sex before marriage, fine. But don’t try to assume the moral high ground and make generalizations about people who do have sex before marriage.
[/quote]

Lol… you people just keep proving my point on assumptions.

Where did I say it is wrong to have sex before marriage? or infact, anything about sex before marriage at all?

Wait for it…

wait for it…

oh yeah, I never mentioned that! Not once![/quote]

For fuck’s sake, man. Go back and read your posts in this thread.

You made all sorts of generalizations and then try to play defense when called on your nonsense. You think what the girl did was wrong. DD feels the same. Awesome. No need for you to act high and mighty because you feel her actions were immoral.

Certainly you understand where I’m coming from?[/quote]

No they clearly don’t.

260

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
no, you actually used the term every, not majority. lie 1.

no, there is nothing reversed about pointing out rapant hypocrisy. there is nothing reversed about sexism against men. lie 2.

no, you called people who disagreed asshats (and lots of other things in later posts) lie 3

no, my acusatons had nothing to do with anything about women. it had only to do with your ignorant accusations about men. lie 4

no, i have also argued and stated that i disagree with the different treatment of the sexes. i have been arguing they should be treated the same. lie 5

no, my judgments of the girls actions has nothing to do with her gender as ive stated over and over. lie 6 and 7

no, there is nothing ignorant in feeling something is wrong (having sex with random unattached people)[/quote]

The last statement is all I needed. There is no way you can write all that other stuff and then write that last fucking sentence…it is ignorant to say that.

I am not commenting on this with you any more. Your last 5 posts all say the exact same thing.

You should go on over to Sex and the Male Animal…one forum thataaa way---------->

You might actually like it.