[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
[quote]KBCThird wrote:
[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:
[quote]KBCThird wrote:
[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
If it’s a rule to not eat on the train (i’m guessing it is) the lady has the right to ask her to stop. It’s public transportation, she has to pay for it.
People spill crap all the time and you know none of them clean it up. It’s why subways always are so nasty.
I get annoyed with people who eat like that on the train. I end up having to ride in a nasty car because of it.[/quote]
100% not a rule to not eat on nyc mta. Its PUBLIC transportation. Youre allowed to eat in PUBLIC. [/quote]
You’re correct that there’s no rule saying that you can’t eat on the subway, but not because it’s in public. You’re not allowed to eat on Washington DC’s public transit subway, the metro[/quote]
That would be an exception to the norm; that you can eat in a public place. The norm is NOT that you CANT eat in a public place. Common sense would have one assume that you are allowed to eat in a public place and that you are not allowed to eat in a public place when an exception is made.
You are allowed to eat on the train BECAUSE its public. You arent allowed to eat on the DC train BECAUSE an exception was made. Your logic is off a bit. [/quote]
No, it’s not. Just because it’s public, you can’t assume that there’s no rule against eating. I didn’t say you should assume there IS a rule, but neither should you assume no rule. Other examples of public places where you can’t eat have been pointed out. Whatever, it’s apparent that you and Duce have some kinda grudge, I’m not getting involved.
Actually, what’s most upsetting to me in this thread is that everyone thinks that’s spaghetti. It’s pretty clearly sesame noodles.[/quote]
He follows me into threads and tries to look for ways he can insult me. It’s actually kinda sad when you think about it really.
I’m surprised that the New York doesn’t have the same solution to eating on the train that Marta does in Atlanta. All the cars reek so badly of urine, it isn’t possible to eat.[/quote]
The city is too damn big to enforce such a rule.
[quote]therajraj wrote:
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
[quote]KBCThird wrote:
[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:
[quote]KBCThird wrote:
[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
If it’s a rule to not eat on the train (i’m guessing it is) the lady has the right to ask her to stop. It’s public transportation, she has to pay for it.
People spill crap all the time and you know none of them clean it up. It’s why subways always are so nasty.
I get annoyed with people who eat like that on the train. I end up having to ride in a nasty car because of it.[/quote]
100% not a rule to not eat on nyc mta. Its PUBLIC transportation. Youre allowed to eat in PUBLIC. [/quote]
You’re correct that there’s no rule saying that you can’t eat on the subway, but not because it’s in public. You’re not allowed to eat on Washington DC’s public transit subway, the metro[/quote]
That would be an exception to the norm; that you can eat in a public place. The norm is NOT that you CANT eat in a public place. Common sense would have one assume that you are allowed to eat in a public place and that you are not allowed to eat in a public place when an exception is made.
You are allowed to eat on the train BECAUSE its public. You arent allowed to eat on the DC train BECAUSE an exception was made. Your logic is off a bit. [/quote]
No, it’s not. Just because it’s public, you can’t assume that there’s no rule against eating. I didn’t say you should assume there IS a rule, but neither should you assume no rule. Other examples of public places where you can’t eat have been pointed out. Whatever, it’s apparent that you and Duce have some kinda grudge, I’m not getting involved.
Actually, what’s most upsetting to me in this thread is that everyone thinks that’s spaghetti. It’s pretty clearly sesame noodles.[/quote]
He follows me into threads and tries to look for ways he can insult me. It’s actually kinda sad when you think about it really.
I’m surprised that the New York doesn’t have the same solution to eating on the train that Marta does in Atlanta. All the cars reek so badly of urine, it isn’t possible to eat.[/quote]
The city is too damn big to enforce such a rule.[/quote]
The urine thing was a joke.
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
[quote]therajraj wrote:
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
[quote]KBCThird wrote:
[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:
[quote]KBCThird wrote:
[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
If it’s a rule to not eat on the train (i’m guessing it is) the lady has the right to ask her to stop. It’s public transportation, she has to pay for it.
People spill crap all the time and you know none of them clean it up. It’s why subways always are so nasty.
I get annoyed with people who eat like that on the train. I end up having to ride in a nasty car because of it.[/quote]
100% not a rule to not eat on nyc mta. Its PUBLIC transportation. Youre allowed to eat in PUBLIC. [/quote]
You’re correct that there’s no rule saying that you can’t eat on the subway, but not because it’s in public. You’re not allowed to eat on Washington DC’s public transit subway, the metro[/quote]
That would be an exception to the norm; that you can eat in a public place. The norm is NOT that you CANT eat in a public place. Common sense would have one assume that you are allowed to eat in a public place and that you are not allowed to eat in a public place when an exception is made.
You are allowed to eat on the train BECAUSE its public. You arent allowed to eat on the DC train BECAUSE an exception was made. Your logic is off a bit. [/quote]
No, it’s not. Just because it’s public, you can’t assume that there’s no rule against eating. I didn’t say you should assume there IS a rule, but neither should you assume no rule. Other examples of public places where you can’t eat have been pointed out. Whatever, it’s apparent that you and Duce have some kinda grudge, I’m not getting involved.
Actually, what’s most upsetting to me in this thread is that everyone thinks that’s spaghetti. It’s pretty clearly sesame noodles.[/quote]
He follows me into threads and tries to look for ways he can insult me. It’s actually kinda sad when you think about it really.
I’m surprised that the New York doesn’t have the same solution to eating on the train that Marta does in Atlanta. All the cars reek so badly of urine, it isn’t possible to eat.[/quote]
The city is too damn big to enforce such a rule.[/quote]
The urine thing was a joke.[/quote]
I meant to enforce a no eating rule on the MTA. That’s what I thought you meant at first.
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
[quote]therajraj wrote:
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
[quote]KBCThird wrote:
[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:
[quote]KBCThird wrote:
[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
If it’s a rule to not eat on the train (i’m guessing it is) the lady has the right to ask her to stop. It’s public transportation, she has to pay for it.
People spill crap all the time and you know none of them clean it up. It’s why subways always are so nasty.
I get annoyed with people who eat like that on the train. I end up having to ride in a nasty car because of it.[/quote]
100% not a rule to not eat on nyc mta. Its PUBLIC transportation. Youre allowed to eat in PUBLIC. [/quote]
You’re correct that there’s no rule saying that you can’t eat on the subway, but not because it’s in public. You’re not allowed to eat on Washington DC’s public transit subway, the metro[/quote]
That would be an exception to the norm; that you can eat in a public place. The norm is NOT that you CANT eat in a public place. Common sense would have one assume that you are allowed to eat in a public place and that you are not allowed to eat in a public place when an exception is made.
You are allowed to eat on the train BECAUSE its public. You arent allowed to eat on the DC train BECAUSE an exception was made. Your logic is off a bit. [/quote]
No, it’s not. Just because it’s public, you can’t assume that there’s no rule against eating. I didn’t say you should assume there IS a rule, but neither should you assume no rule. Other examples of public places where you can’t eat have been pointed out. Whatever, it’s apparent that you and Duce have some kinda grudge, I’m not getting involved.
Actually, what’s most upsetting to me in this thread is that everyone thinks that’s spaghetti. It’s pretty clearly sesame noodles.[/quote]
He follows me into threads and tries to look for ways he can insult me. It’s actually kinda sad when you think about it really.
I’m surprised that the New York doesn’t have the same solution to eating on the train that Marta does in Atlanta. All the cars reek so badly of urine, it isn’t possible to eat.[/quote]
The city is too damn big to enforce such a rule.[/quote]
The urine thing was a joke.[/quote]
No. Some of the NYC subways do smell like urine lol. If it’s not from someone directly pissing on the train at night, it’s indirectly from a hobo pissing in his pants and then sitting on the train.
As far as eating on Public Transport in NJ, it’s OK on the trains and prohibited on the buses. I take the NJ Transit train everyday and sometimes eat a roast beef sandwich on the way home. No one has ever called me an animal yet lol.
I once walked thru car after car of packed people, and then the next car was EMPTY! I triumphantly made my way in and then the stink hit me like a freight train. A bum was sleeping in the corner, and the whole car stunk like the fucking grave! Just awful - I suddenly knew why it was the only empty car!
[quote]sam_sneed wrote:
No. Some of the NYC subways do smell like urine lol. If it’s not from someone directly pissing on the train at night, it’s indirectly from a hobo pissing in his pants and then sitting on the train.
As far as eating on Public Transport in NJ, it’s OK on the trains and prohibited on the buses. I take the NJ Transit train everyday and sometimes eat a roast beef sandwich on the way home. No one has ever called me an animal yet lol.[/quote]
YOU ANIMAL!
(consider the situation rectified)
I kid…