DOJ Operation Choke Point Behind Porn Star Bank Account Closings

DOJ Operation “Choke Point” Targets Bank Accounts of Enemies of the State

By: Elizabeth Nolan Brown, Staff Editor Reason Magazine

Despite being in good financial standing, adult film performers and others in the porn industry have had bank accounts abruptly terminated-and the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) may have had something to do with it.

Under “Operation Choke Point,” the DOJ and its allies are going after legal but subjectively undesirable business ventures by pressuring banks to terminate their bank accounts or refuse their business. The very premise is clearly chilling – the DOJ is coercing private businesses in an attempt to centrally engineer the American marketplace based on it’s own politically biased moral judgements. Targeted business categories so far have included payday lenders, ammunition sales, dating services, purveyors of drug paraphernalia, and legal online gambling sites.

Operation Chokepoint is flooding payments companies that provide processing service to those industries with subpoenas, civil investigative demands, and other burdensome and costly legal demands," wrote Jason Oxman, CEO of the Electronic Transactions Association, at The Hill.

The theory behind this enforcement program has superficial logic: increase the legal and compliance costs of serving certain disfavored merchant categories, and payments companies will simply stop providing service to such merchants. And it’s working-payments companies across the country are cutting off service to categories of merchants that - although providing a legal service - are creating the potential for significant financial and reputational harm as law enforcement publicizes its activities.

Thus far, payday lenders have been the most frequent target. … And if payday lenders are today’s target-what category will be next and who makes that decision?

I’m not sure who made the decision, but it seems the next big targeted category is the adult film industry. Last week, adult film actress Teagan Presley (pictured above) and an unknown number of others in the porn industry received notices that their Chase Bank accounts were being abruptly terminated.

“When Presley went to the bank in person to ask why, she was told it’s because she’s considered ‘high risk,’” according to VICE News. VICE’s Mary O’Hara was the first to note a likely link between the porn bank account closings and Operation Choke Point. The DOJ did not respond to VICE News’ request for comment.

For years, various government initiatives have been aimed at reaching the “unbanked” and “underbanked.” Federal officials claim to want to help these individuals avoid high fees and other downsides of nontraditional financial services, but it’s hard not to suspect these efforts have at least as much to do with wanting a record of everyone’s financial goings-on. If the unbanked were such a real concern, why would federal agencies be simultaneously encouraging banks to drop more customers?

Targeting porn performers or not, Operation Choke Point represents an incredible abuse of regulatory power. In a recent American Banker op-ed, former Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. Chairman William M. Isaac called it “a direct assault on the democratic system and free-market economy.”

In a March 2013 hearing before a Senate Banking subcommittee, Sen. David Vitter (R-La.) pointed out the obvious: that DOJ has “no statutory authority” to be doing this. But why bother with statutory authority when you can just secretly strong-arm highly regulated businesses into doing what you want?

First they came for the porn stars - and I did not speak out because I was not a porn star…

[quote]SexMachine wrote:
First they came for the porn stars - and I did not speak out because I was not a porn star…[/quote]

Clever.

Interesting , I see Vice news in there , I wonder if there are any grounds beyond being (UNDESIRABLE) ?

Bank regulators?particularly the FDIC?have joined in the action, warning banks away from serving more than 22 categories of businesses, including ?Get Rich Products,? ?Ammunition Sales,? ?Pharmaceutical Sales,? ?Home Based Charities,? and even ?As Seen on TV? businesses. Some of these businesses may indeed be risky. But that doesn?t justify pre-emptively declaring them all criminals and freezing their access to the payments system. -Frank Keating, Mr. Keating is president and CEO of the American Bankers Association. He also is a former FBI agent, U.S. attorney and associate attorney general of the United States.

I try and stay (mostly) apolitical, but I can only imagine the cognitive dissonance this is creating in some liberals right now.

A quick Google search shows a dearth of articles coming from traditionally left wing media organizations.

These people are fucking scumballs for strong-arming legal activities into financial oblivion. Unbelievable!

Land of the free.

I’m betting both Holder and Obama know nothing about what is happening.

This could be the reason for this spot light .

You have billions of dollars that have to be stored in non bank facilities . A NEW very extensive Security Industry because of the problem described in original post . Marijuana Industry has to be the largest of this group.

In RE to pay day loans places , I could see they are breaking laws . And what an easy industry to loath :slight_smile:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

In RE to pay day loans places , I could see they are breaking laws . And what an easy industry to loath :)[/quote]

What laws are they breaking? Even the DoJ says they’re not breaking laws otherwise they would be subject to prosecution.

They are simply legal - but morally unattractive to some - businesses.

[quote]Dr. Pangloss wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

In RE to pay day loans places , I could see they are breaking laws . And what an easy industry to loath :)[/quote]

What laws are they breaking? Even the DoJ says they’re not breaking laws otherwise they would be subject to prosecution.

They are simply legal - but morally unattractive to some - businesses.

[/quote]

it is just my opinion , Pay Day loans are exploiting the most vulnerable of our society . That is the reason for my loathing :slight_smile:

loathing something isn’t a valid reason for unaccountable government bodies to “target” specific industries.

I loath ugh boots, but if I were president/head of some department with the power to I wouldn’t, nor should I have the power to, put them out of business.

edit to clarify details

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]Dr. Pangloss wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

In RE to pay day loans places , I could see they are breaking laws . And what an easy industry to loath :)[/quote]

What laws are they breaking? Even the DoJ says they’re not breaking laws otherwise they would be subject to prosecution.

They are simply legal - but morally unattractive to some - businesses.

[/quote]

it is just my opinion , Pay Day loans are exploiting the most vulnerable of our society . That is the reason for my loathing :slight_smile:
[/quote]

You said you can see that they’re breaking the law. No one else can see what you see. Tell us what law you can see them breaking.

[quote]countingbeans wrote:
loathing something isn’t a valid reason for unaccountable government bodies to “target” specific industries.

I loath ugh boots, but if I were president I wouldn’t, nor should I have the power to, put them out of business. [/quote]

I agree , but loaning money has a boat load of regulations (AND SHOULD)have so

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]Dr. Pangloss wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

In RE to pay day loans places , I could see they are breaking laws . And what an easy industry to loath :)[/quote]

What laws are they breaking? Even the DoJ says they’re not breaking laws otherwise they would be subject to prosecution.

They are simply legal - but morally unattractive to some - businesses.

[/quote]

it is just my opinion , Pay Day loans are exploiting the most vulnerable of our society . That is the reason for my loathing :slight_smile:
[/quote]

You said you can see that they’re breaking the law. No one else can see what you see. Tell us what law you can see them breaking.
[/quote]

just like the tax code , I am sure there are so many regulations that you could be breaking the law no matter how you approach the transaction

Hope that helps :slight_smile:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]countingbeans wrote:
loathing something isn’t a valid reason for unaccountable government bodies to “target” specific industries.

I loath ugh boots, but if I were president I wouldn’t, nor should I have the power to, put them out of business. [/quote]

I agree , but loaning money has a boat load of regulations (AND SHOULD)have so
[/quote]

Then pass a bill banning those type loans, if you can.

What is worse than same day loans? People who use governmental bodies to unlawfully inhibit their currently perfectly legal business.

[quote]countingbeans wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]countingbeans wrote:
loathing something isn’t a valid reason for unaccountable government bodies to “target” specific industries.

I loath ugh boots, but if I were president I wouldn’t, nor should I have the power to, put them out of business. [/quote]

I agree , but loaning money has a boat load of regulations (AND SHOULD)have so
[/quote]

Then pass a bill banning those type loans, if you can.

What is worse than same day loans? People who use governmental bodies to unlawfully inhibit their currently perfectly legal business.

[/quote]

Arizona did :slight_smile:

[quote]countingbeans wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]countingbeans wrote:
loathing something isn’t a valid reason for unaccountable government bodies to “target” specific industries.

I loath ugh boots, but if I were president I wouldn’t, nor should I have the power to, put them out of business. [/quote]

I agree , but loaning money has a boat load of regulations (AND SHOULD)have so
[/quote]

Then pass a bill banning those type loans, if you can.

What is worse than same day loans? People who use governmental bodies to unlawfully inhibit their currently perfectly legal business.

[/quote]

I will tell you , they are a slippery lot

[quote]countingbeans wrote:
I loath ugh boots, but if I were president/head of some department with the power to I wouldn’t, nor should I have the power to, put them out of business.
[/quote]

I would. Outlaw them and shoot anyone wearing them. No questions asked. Those and Crocs.

james