I know there are alot of factors - SBHG , e2 , free T , ect…, but if all things stable - Is there a big difference between 600 and 1000 total T as far as muscle gain / fat loss .
You likely wouldn’t notice much difference between 600 and 1000 as far as gym performance/fat loss. It takes a more pronounced difference to notice a big effect. Essentially, you’re still in range at either of those numbers. Where you notice a difference is going from low to middle/upper end of the scale. That will be a big difference.
Good question;I asked an Olympic coach at York University in Toronto.I asked if premier athletes had Higher Bio-available than athlet’s that never win high level competition’s.
He stated testosterone is only a ?-mark,it’s the total package. I then ask’s about guy’s like myself than use testosterone to build and repair muscle.
He then asked me about all the guy’s that over-dose on testosterone only to develop pimples and a fat watery soft muscles.His analysis is that genetic’s is the factor that makes the person a responder,a responder will gain great advantage from testosterone,wher a non responder can take test until the Cow’s come home and only get mediocre result’s.