[quote]SexMachine wrote:
He could be making a statement about German Beer or sinusitis or cabbages. But if all the information we have to go on is a cartoon-like picture of Obama wearing a crown of thorns with his arms outstretched then we have to make a reasonable judgement, surely?
[/quote]
? Is viewing art about your “judgment”?
The last time you went to a museum, you spent time “judging” Da Vinci?
The point is, in art, it is about interpretation…and most artists people care about are usually making a statement that is NOT so easily “judged”. That is why Mona Lisa’s smile is still being debated today.
You are making the point that you KNOW the intent of the artist. You have no proof of this.
[quote]
For starters, comparing any ‘suffering’ that the recently re-elected president has endured to the suffering of Jesus is flippant because:
- The two aren’t remotely comparable.
and
- Jesus is considered the son of God who endured suffering for the sake of all mankind. Whereas Obama is the son of a Communist philanderer and sailed through life with a silver spoon in his mouth. However, even if it were Mother Teresa the picture would still be blasphemous as it misappropriates the symbolism of Jesus and diminishes its importance by comparison with man.[/quote]
? Once again, without knowing the artist’s intent, you can’t make these claims. You don’t know what he is “comparing”. You simply know he drew Obama with a crown of thorns. That’s it. If his “intent” was to show he he perceived the media’s portrayal, once again, that would make you wrong.
