Disney's Agenda Leaked

man, your guess is as good as mine. I don’t get it. The weightlifting stuff always came first for me. I only began in engaging with people in the pwi section after I’d formed relationships with them through lifting, and I considered them to be friends. I’ve know guys like Bauber on and off of this website for a decade +

2 Likes

Probably correct. Maybe I should create a thread to ponder just this? I am truly curious and not just shooting arrows at “you-know-who”.

Ditto man. I mean there are a ton of people with thousands of posts in Politics and maybe a dozen in the fitness categories. I guess they want to flex their Poli-Sci muscles to a bunch of meatheads.

1 Like

I got solutions. But assholes won’t give a shit. Especially the assholes who are laughing. They would rather continue having needless countries, wars, poverty, dystopian censorship, environmentally unsustainable businesses, environmentally unsustainable planned obsolescence, horrendous animal abuse in the meat and dairy industry, political coups, impulsive consumerism, steroids that harm men’s health, water contamination from a hormone disruptor called fluoride that causes unborn babies to have permanent hormone disorders that cause lifelong health problems, smoking that ruins people’s health, alcohol that automatically corrupts people’s brain chemicals while increasing chance of cancer, and other shit. It’s all tied to human nature and why humans are usually worse than other species except for higher intelligence. If only humans were more intelligent than other species AND make the world a better place at the same time. But like I said. These assholes don’t care. That’s some of them are bullying Lee Camp, Julian Assange, and others through censorship to promote pro-war propaganda. They want war to keep extorting money and power. That’s why children, women, and men are getting killed endlessly. It’s not because of justice. It’s because of hunger for power and money. That’s why these assholes are very wealthy by living in nice houses and go on yachts while good people who are exposing evil shit these assholes are doing get blacklisted in mainstream media, ostracized by elites, and demonitized to make sure they don’t have enough money to get resources for fighting against these very wealthy assholes.

You wouldn’t be the first… The wisdom of Colucci eclipsed his time here.

1 Like

Please do share your solutions. I’ve been mocking you consistently (and for good reason) but I’m actually being 100% serious.

What do you propose to fix these societal evils?

They, them, and theirs are the pronouns I’m asking for. Not she, her, hers, he, him, and his.

To be fair, not all people talking in this website are males.

Maybe you should consider running for office. Start local and work your way up to federal politics. If you ‘got’ solutions, we need you to put them in place.

I’m not laughing nor have I acted like an a—hole to you. And I will not. So why can’t you answer?

1 Like

Stopping the union busting, wars that destroy countries economically, political coups used for making very rich tyrants more powerful for extorting wealth, countries requiring passports that are not good when people are trying to escape from dying during natural disasters like floods, poverty, dsytopian censorship, pro-war propaganda used for grooming minors into becoming evil soldiers who kill children for power disguised as justice, and so many other things. But it’s easier said than done when these assholes control things.

I answered you. But like I said. It’s easier said than done.

By this logic, none of the Founding Fathers would be considered good people. That’s exactly what people get mad about - judging those who lived in the past and saying their bad actions outweighed their good ones.

@WorkSmartPlaySmart - I would HIGHLY recommend learning how to separate thoughts into paragraphs.

1 Like

You make a good point however comparing founding fathers to a figure head of the 1960s is a little bit of a stretch. I do agree with you that judging modern acceptable actions to those of the past is not good rhetoric but I was not the one that called him a ‘compassionate leader’. Cheating on your wife and participating/watching your fellow man rape other women (allegedly) are not actions I would champion as compassionate.

3 Likes

No thanks. Most of us live in reality, not make believe.

1 Like

I’m sorry, did I make this claim anywhere? I said on this thread, specifically. I know how to choose my words appropriately. Perhaps you could try to read more critically.

thank you for clarifying. This is actually the FIRST time you’ve asked for this. The idea that you would think we should assume that this is what you wanted is pretty baffling. I’ve been posting on TNation for 15+ years, and this is the first time I’ve come upon this request (I have come upon it in my personal life, but never here). It’s fine to WANT someone to do something very outside of the norm, but you certainly need to ask for it first, rather than just think we’re all going to assume that the first person who has such a desire has suddenly arrived on the site.

If you’re expecting the people on this site to suddenly start asking every new member what pronouns they prefer, you’ll be disappointed.

Moving beyond this: it sounds like you’ve got a whole bunch of talking points and taglines you want to rant about, but very little substance behind it. It would be considered a ‘gish gallop’ in a debate setting. It’s an attempt to essentially throw the kitchen sink into the argument, confuse any original points, and prevent any real progress in the conversation. It works pretty well on people who don’t recognize the technique. But your broad, vague post about your ‘solutions’ to the problems are anything but that. Like, if someone asked me how to eliminate poverty in the world, and I responded ‘make sure everyone has enough money for things’… That wouldn’t be a ‘solution’. It’s basically just rephrasing the original question. If you feel that unions are useful, and your ‘solution’ involves ‘stop busting unions’… what have you really said? Nothing.

3 Likes

Then, I will ignore you since your transphobic remark doesn’t represent the support of humanity getting away from biological limitations like biological sex from words like he, she, him, her, his, and hers. Which these biological limitations keep humans dumb by the way. They don’t liberate humans.

Sex and gender are not malleable and I refuse to bend to people because they “feel” a certain way. Cry me a river and grow up.

4 Likes

Founding Fathers who stole natives’ land with faked legal documents to create a ruthless empire after white men raped natives. Which these faked legal documents were ripe for creating loopholes. Loopholes that upper-class, white lawyers would exploit for creating the increasingly evil shit that AmeriKKKa’s very rich oligarchs would do to countries and victimized people.

At least I know this place has people who don’t accommodate transgender people by not politely asking what people’s pronouns are before saying “he”, “she”, etc.

To me it sounds like you don’t like human nature. Or at least the tendency that if you get a group of people that is large enough, one, some or many of them will strive for power. This isn’t exclusive to humans, but our intelligence allows for us to potentially gain power over a lot more individuals compared to monkeys or something.

So what to do about it?

How big is your circle of control? Can you expand your circle of control? Worrying about things outside the circle isn’t beneficial even though we all kinda do it.

1 Like

If you’re going to write a manifesto at least have the courtesy to do it in a relevant thread. This thread is about Walt Disneys gay conspiracy agenda.

3 Likes