There’s no shorter path to special privileges in 2022, especially if you are on the low end of the progressive victimhood totem pole. A white dude in his 40’s with aspirations of competing in the Olympic sport of Weightlifting will be unable to do so in the Men’s bracket. That’s a fact no man in his 40’s is ever likely to disprove.
Fortunately for these brave and beautiful trans women, who the slogan tells us are women, the IOC is progressive enough to allow these special women to compete. Because they’re just like any other woman, and in some cases even more womanly.
No they don’t.
We place an awful lot of limits on what parents can do to their children, typically for very good reasons. You don’t get to abuse kids just because you made them.
Racism, homophobia, religion, politics, misogyny, a sense of entitlement… The inner city is full of kids being fed stupid things by whatever parent is around.
He unfortunately has a very valid point (WHICH I DISAGREE WITH).
It is the ‘next step’ after society accepting homosexuality and transsexuals. We are already accepting homosexuality because its not a choice and a person should be free to be themselves. We are already indulging mentally ill people who identify as different genders and trying to normalize it to the point where certain countries are using the law to enforce the bullshit. Why are we leaving this mentally sick sexual preference out of our acceptance binge while having annual celebrations about LGBQTs?
This would not be a thing if society didn’t try and be fucking woke and plander to all other sexual groups.
The worrying thing in my opinion is how many people there are who are actually attracted to kids but don’t act on it because it’s wrong and socially vilified. The fact child stars get openly sexualise the moment they hit 18, the fact that 18 year olds (like ‘catch me outside girl’) can generate MILLIONS of Only fans 1 week after being 18, the fact most countries need to have an age of consent for teenagers etc just shows a lot of these fuckers would come out like locust if ever it was even hinted pedophilia can be accepted
And this will be the moment the left loses the culture wars. The same way they wouldn’t denounce the rioting and looting generated by BLM, they won’t denounce the pedophilia which will run rampant throughout LGBT. They’ll look to blame white supremacists which hardly exist, just to change the narrative, but they won’t get past the stink they’ve been covering up for years.
And then the Epstein files will resurface to show he worked for the CIA and his sole purpose was to fly billionaires and politicians out so they could be compromised. Same way it went for Sandusky.
The Left has only cared about pedophilia ONCE: When it incorrectly labeled Roy Moore one in order to “Nana-Nana-BooBoo, it’s not just us” the Right about pedophilia.
I have faith that the majority of the left isn’t pro-pedophile, the same way the majority of them arent pro-trans-grooming. They’re just mostly silent on them as of now, the same way the right is mostly silent about white nationalist groups.
Or maybe the left will go to bat for the pedophiles, in which case I have plenty of ammo
This is the crux of the matter. They can’t get enough adults to believe in gender ideology, so they indoctrinate children to young to reason into it. This ensures a safe space for mentally deranged trannies and “drag queens” in 20 years.
There’s no evidence and rather evidence to the contrary that performing “gender affirmation” on teens and prepubertal children is good for their mental health in the long run. The guys on here active in the Pharma category probably know 100 reasons why giving aromatase inhibitors to pre pubertal girls with the intent to stop puberty is asinine. But what’s the most incredible thing I’ve probably ever heard in medicine a medical professional utter is that “puberty blockers are completely reversible”. It is clear as day and completely backed by every biological science in animals and humans ever produced that the body has a timed program for hormones, neurotransmitters and growth of all kinds of tissues. These processes once disturbed will never get back to normal. It is proven from single cells of all sorts to whole organs that this is not the case. Medical professionals who utter this sentence should immediately lose their allowance to practice.
———————————-
I agree with Shapiro here and I can tell you that in German TV series which run during the day and for children, the “not so secret gay agenda” is present. On Christopher street day there are 9-12 year olds walking in groups with nearly nude gay and trans men and carrying the rainbow flag. Schools with children from 10-18 all over Germany put up gay flags now in support of gender ideology. Disney is just the next enterprise that joins in the indoctrination efforts.
I agree whole heartedly with your point but remember that pedophilia is attraction to prepubertal children. From wiki:
Pedophilia (alternatively spelt paedophilia ) is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children.[1][2]Although girls typically begin the process of pubertyat age 10 or 11, and boys at age 11 or 12,[3] criteria for pedophilia extend the cut-off point for prepubescence to age 13.[4] A person must be at least 16 years old, and at least five years older than the prepubescent child, for the attraction to be diagnosed as pedophilia.[4][5]
This means being physically attracted to a 16-18 year old as a grown up is not pedophilia. It is wrong to act on the urge but it is known that men largely find 16-22 year old girls/women most attractive.
@lordgains I don’t want to derail the thread too much but I have an inquiry.
What do you think is an inappropriate age at which a man acts on his attraction for eighteen to 22 year old woman? I was 31 years old when I met my wife and she was 24. Had I met her two years earlier, I would be 29 and she would be 22.
A friend of mine once dated a 20 year old when he was 30.
Of course you are not speaking of me specifically, nor have you given an age gap.
I just find it interesting that many men consider older men going for eighteen to 25 year old women (perhaps marry and raise a family, not just “have fun”) creepy, yet at the same time indulge in magazines, social media accounts, strip clubs, and pornography (as some here know, I loathe the last two) that mostly feature women of these ages and have the hots for celebrities of these ages. Most women in such entertainment were “discovered” at eighteen to 22.
People condone or indulge in all sorts of sexual impropriety, but when a young women goes for an older man for an actual marriage or serious relationship she is considered “stupid,” “gullible,” “naive,” and “submissive (how terrible),” and the man is considered creepy and perverted and “wants to control the woman.”
I do realize that some age gaps are unwise and not pragmatic (eg, young woman having kids with a to-be old geezer when the kids are still young).
Or a gold digger. Studies show the larger the age difference, the greater the chance of divorce. I didn’t see anything about how far into the marriage divorce is more likely to occur. If I had to guess, it would be early in the marriage.
If I were single right now I couldn’t date a woman around my age. I look ten years younger than I am and most of the women I see close to my age look like crap. A woman where I work thought she was 10 years older than I when it turns out she is a few years younger. It was a very awkward moment.
My opinion on this is shaped by the culture I grew up in and also my personal opinions on intersexual dynamics.
I’ll start with a quote I find to be very true: “We need an age limit FOR WOMEN, so young women do not start jumping on older men even earlier”. I think this is largely true. As long as it is consensual (and this is what we are talking about here), a woman is the gatekeeper to sex. That means no sex without the woman wanting to. This would mean a 16 year old girl can be attracted enough to a 30 year old man to consent to sex. Now the question becomes, at what age do we see the consent of the woman as a grown ups decision. At what age can she even consent?
In Germany a girl can consent from 14-15 if the guy is under 16, too. A 16 year old can consent but the parents can intervene and an 18 year old can open the gates for anyone. I think this is quite sensible if consent is the only thing that matters. Unfortunately I don’t think it is, but our society has no other standard anymore. I don’t think 14 year old girls should fuck 14 year old boys (even though I would love it, if I was 14).
This is my point. Our society killed all standards regarding sex besides consent.
Now, in my opinion a girl should be 16 to have sex at all. Just so if she becomes pregnant it’s at least manageable to raise a kid and be somewhat grown up. In a functioning society we would have serious relationships most of the time which would make it ok for me that even a 16 year old has sex with a 30 year old. But now, I think there should be a <22 yo partner rule (later more in this). At 18, I think they should be able to have sex with whomever they want.
The problem I have to clarify before going into age differences is the one of sexual impropriety. I know you and your friends are men of faith which means you’d like a women that has not had 5 or 20 partners before you. This is very difficult with single women in their mid 20s. The statistics are also clear on this: the more sex partners, the likelier a marriage fails. Pair bonding ability goes severely down with every new cock. So ideally the woman for the serious relationship is somewhat “inexperienced” (aka not a slut). So men who are in search for serious relationships and marriage actually HAVE to go somewhat lower in age as the decay of society made it possible for women to start at 14 to jump on every man they find remotely attractive. This will influence my opinion on the matter.
The question now is, what is the optimal age gap and what is a manageable age gap and what is in my opinion morally wrong.
The optimal age gap depends on the man’s life choices. A man who goes to university won’t be able to support a family until ~27-30. Since I’m a huge proponent of having (a) kid(s) under 25 for women, this would mean that the optimal age gap here is at least 2 years and optimally 5-7 years. That means I don’t think it is a moral or logical wrong to be 27 with a 20 year old. The biological and societal clocks match up. I know women at 18-22 statistically find men at 25-30 highly attractive and this is the reason. Women’s hormones and instincts go for established and high up in the hierarchy men with drive, while men’s instincts go for signs of health and youth. Clearly for men working full time at 20 there’s no reason for a large age gap and optimal would be 23-18 or 23-20 for example and getting children also under woman’s 25 after a few years of being together.
A manageable age gap in my opinion would be 10-15 years. So 35 and 20 at the most. But rather 28-18 for example. I don’t have a problem as long as the intentions of the man are serious and there’s a relationship coming. For casual sex, I think it’s a bit dicey. I at 30 have so much more experience in talking to women and have so much to offer that I could get most 18 year olds into bed. I don’t think I should. It’s like a heavy weight boxing a light weight. There’s a case to be made that a player at 30 can not get informed consent from a 18 year old. It’s just hindbrain. (For reference sake, a girl I knew in school lost her virginity at 15 to a 35 year old work colleague from her mother, highly immoral and illegal).
Unmanageable gaps would for me be >15 years of difference. At 40 and 20, it’s not worth pursuing a relationship as there’s to large a
physical ability gap when kids get older. The classic teacher-student relationships are wrong therefore. If the guy is 70 while she is 40, it will be really bad for the children. I’ve seen it a few times in my surroundings. The fathers get old fast and can’t offer much to the family. These should be very rare occurrences for the kids sake.
[a last not so fitting point: I don’t think in todays society Leonardo DiCaprio is doing something wrong. He’s using his status and charms and therefore attractiveness to get much younger hotter women. He could support them and he has long term relationships with them. At a certain point in the male hierarchy there’s also no point in scolding him while these chicks line up for him. A healthy society would still have rare occurrences of these. Reminds me of the kings in antique europe having many young women.]
There’s more to discuss here but it’s late here in Central Europe so excuse my ramblings.
I don’t think you should if you were single. Men age like wine, women like milk. That’s just reality. Men have to take the time to make something out of themselves (self made millionaires) while women are trust fund babies, born with their beauty but spending it all until 30. That’s why there’s an age gap. Men have to develop and acquire resources and status while women have to invest their beauty into an as successful men as they can find before they lose all their market value. This is the reality of biology. Since it now takes men longer than ever to acquire resources, the age gap gets a few years larger as a product.
The other point you are making is that women don’t take care of themselves. And it is like that. I know very few attractive 30 year old women. It’s a shame. They just don’t take care of themselves. Waste their health during their party years and look fat and ugly at 30. While I invest weeks in the gym and diet and try to avoid alcohol and study and work hard, these girls throw their looks away. But then they expect men like me to settle for a 10+ sex partners, fat, hobby less, wrinkly and need of support woman. I don’t do that and neither do any intelligent men at 30.
