Cuz terms like “riot”, “mob”, “begging” are generally code for “not white”
OL
[quote]mjnewland wrote:
Cuz terms like “riot”, “mob”, “begging” are generally code for “not white”
OL[/quote]
How ironic. Your own racism caused you to intepret my statement in a racist way . . . .
In my area mobs and riots are generally associated with types that you would see protesting at G8 summits, WTO meetings, enviromental protests, george bush and company appearances, and the likes. Sometimes they are peaceful, sometimes they are violent. Their hatred for bush is all consuming. Generally speaking these are college students that have never had a real job or are just starting one and still believe all the crap that their college professors fed them about a socialist utopia. That of course is a generalization. My co workers are an example of an exception as they are not exactly fresh out of college. Do a google and judge for yourself.
Like I said I work with some of these lunatics. They believe that since Bush “stole” the election in 2000 and in 2004 that they would be completely legit in their attempt to seize the presidency through rioting if obama had lost. Fortunately for all of us, it did not come to that.
[quote]mjnewland wrote:
HH, I?ll respond like this:
Old Lardass? List of Rascist Comments on This Thread:
Koffea: is that if he had not won, you know their would have been a lot of violence and riotes in numerous cities across the country.
HeadHunter: One of my student’s dad owns a store in Cleveland. Three businesses right by him were looted and burned. The dad sat in his store all night, with a gun. [[q- when did this happen?]]
Welcome to Obamaland…the rule of the unthinking mob, the rule of those who vote yet are immune to facts, as long as they get ‘change’.
HeadHunter:: He and his fellow satanists bought the election, from a bunch of people who have no thought of country…
And HH: I suspect the change they’ll get very soon is coins while begging.
Fuck, Head, you win the racist comment prize!
As for who hires us, I’d say the smart rich people did.
xoxoxo
OL
[/quote]
You see racism in any of that? Racism? Are you using some new definition of racism and not telling any of us? You’re one dumb fuck.
[quote]mjnewland wrote:
Cuz terms like “riot”, “mob”, “begging” are generally code for “not white”
OL[/quote]
Funny…those definitions don’t fit with any dictionary I’ve ever seen and used.
Are you with Ministry of Truth (1984) where you redefine words to mean what Big Brother wants? Wake up from fantasyland there, oh plant-life employee.
If I was the ministry of truth, I’d be carrying your head around in a bucket.
you guys seem to have some pretty strong opinions founded on nothing.
Why don’t you tell me a litte bit about the last economics course you took?
[quote]mjnewland wrote:
If I was the ministry of truth, I’d be carrying your head around in a bucket.
you guys seem to have some pretty strong opinions founded on nothing.
Why don’t you tell me a litte bit about the last economics course you took?[/quote]
I have strong opinions on idiots who make up meanings for words, to call another person a bigot.
This may seems a triviality but making up new meanings for words hurts you. If you create a new language out of the mainstream of middle-class America, then guess what? You’ll never join that class. You can then rant and rave about ‘Racist America’ and vote for a smooth talking charlatan who offers to fix everything for you.
LMAO!!
[quote]Rockscar wrote:
Professor X wrote:
Big_Boss wrote:
Professor X wrote:
Big_Boss wrote:
koffea wrote:
I agree, however the only caveat to that, is that if he had not won, you know their would have been a lot of violence and riotes in numerous cities across the country.
The way people talk around here…you would think there would be riots because he won…or lynchings for some.
They are claiming he is their “enemy” yet they also accuse the other side of “possible riots”?
I would be more worried about the people claiming the US president is an enemy than I would some prediction of a riot that never happened.
yet the “other side” is speaking in ways that they usually deem “unpatriotic”…"un-American for others. They’re sounding like the terrorists they “know” will take over our country because of Obama. This country is overrun with fear mongers.
If you call a US president an “ENEMY” you are a terrorist.
That’s how they called it for years so why change it now?
Socialism and hate is the enemy. Nobody called Barack the enemy. His socialistic policies and his shady friends who say they wished they had BOMBED more, and the God #(#* America church that spewed hate toward the USA are definate enemies.
20 years of hatefull and racial sermons battered into Obamas head scares the hell out of me. His idea of a National Civilian Security force to monitor the “People” sounds a lot like the Gestapo or SS to me.
[/quote]
Um, dude? We’re white. No one is going to disenfranchise us, no one is going to oppress us, we make up the majority of the country, and the vast majority of the wealth. Black reverse-racism, when it actually exists, does not scare me. It’s like the U.S. being scared of Venezuela or Iran. Oh wait…
Yea right - like I didn’t listen to 8 years of left wingers screaming their heads off about Bush being Hitler, and how the Patriot Act was going to reach a point of gestapo searches on average citizens and a massive police state, where Bush would use his power to declare an American empire and refuse to vacate the presidency at the end of his term…
Ha ha ha - yea, that really fucking happened. Now I have to listen to at least 4 years of the same fucking ignorant, fear-mongering horse-shit about Obama and his plans to install a radical private army of Farrakhan clones to take over the country, and how his “socialist” policies will destroy America. Jesus Christ - this is why the country is so fucked up, so divisive about every last thing.
I’m an independent - I’ve voted for dems, I’ve voted for repubs. I voted for Clinton, for Bush and for Obama. I was absolutely lambasted in political arguments for supporting GWB, and now it’s the same shit about Obama. It’s just a ridiculous, vicious cycle of stupidity.
I’ll be laughing here in 4 years when once again, these tin-foil hat, crackpot predictions about the president prove to be false.
[quote]mjnewland wrote:
If I was the ministry of truth, I’d be carrying your head around in a bucket.
you guys seem to have some pretty strong opinions founded on nothing.
Why don’t you tell me a litte bit about the last economics course you took?[/quote]
It was about linear financial instruments, i.e. bonds and swaps.
What would you like to know?
[quote]SkyNett wrote:
Yea right - like I didn’t listen to 8 years of left wingers screaming their heads off about Bush being Hitler, and how the Patriot Act was going to reach a point of gestapo searches on average citizens and a massive police state, where Bush would use his power to declare an American empire and refuse to vacate the presidency at the end of his term…
Ha ha ha - yea, that really fucking happened. Now I have to listen to at least 4 years of the same fucking ignorant, fear-mongering horse-shit about Obama and his plans to install a radical private army of Farrakhan clones to take over the country, and how his “socialist” policies will destroy America. Jesus Christ - this is why the country is so fucked up, so divisive about every last thing.
I’m an independent - I’ve voted for dems, I’ve voted for repubs. I voted for Clinton, for Bush and for Obama. I was absolutely lambasted in political arguments for supporting GWB, and now it’s the same shit about Obama. It’s just a ridiculous, vicious cycle of stupidity.
I’ll be laughing here in 4 years when once again, these tin-foil hat, crackpot predictions about the president prove to be false.
[/quote]
You should have listened more closely to the tin foil brigade.
The laws Hitler used to rule without the parliament were decades old when he came along.
Maybe this president has not used them to their full extent, maybe the next won´t, and maybe in 20 years some kind of WMD attack on LA happens and a charismatic leader will begin to use those powers and those that will be given the office until then in earnest.
The US has a long history of peaceful transition of government. That didn’t change and all can be grateful about that.
The US also has a history of not persecuting the out of power party using the investigative resources of the Federal Government. Democratic supporters have called for this in the past and the congressional leadership has not spoke out aginst it in the least. Waxman in particular has been vindictive. Democrats should be reminded the jailhouse door can lock up Democrats as well as Republicans depending on the mood of the voters.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
Rockscar wrote:
Socialism and hate is the enemy. Nobody called Barack the enemy.
Tiribulus just called Obama the enemy. You thought I just pulled that from nowhere?[/quote]
And I stand by that statement. Obama subscribes to the ideologies of those we have fought on and off the battlefield as enemies. The framers of our founding principles would gag and choke if they could see what we have done with what they left us. He’s not the only one BTW.
EDIT: While I’m at it I’ll formally distance myself from anybody calling for an open mind and cooperation with this guy.
I have no interest in cooperating with those who seek to destroy the noblest principles of my country. I don’t hate Barack Obama personally. I’ve even said that on occasion I’ve found him pleasant and likable. However he represents everything that is rotting this nation from the inside out, especially for black people.
Just hold on Doc. This guy has guaranteed that the first (half) black president will be the last for quite a while. I can hear the lunatic racist skinhead neo nazi types already. [quote]"We tried so hard to tell you what would happen[/quote] He will be the source of a startling increase in recruitment for assholes like this who are even more un-American than he is.
You may really be disappointed and angry with me, but MARK MY WORDS. Even you will be questioning how great an idea this guy was. I absolutely promise you. Only it’s not THIS guy. He’s no better or worse than any other ultra leftist America hater.
Congress is full of em. It’s the poisonous choking ideology of big government intrusiveness that the very foundation of the United States was formed to escape.
This is not a sporting event where all sides shake hands at the end. The country my children will live in after I’m gone is being defined and I will not be a party to it’s further decay.
Trib, how about listing the exact ideologies that we have fought on and off the battlefield that Obama subscribes to?
HH: What does LMAO mean? I’m new here.
You know, I never called you guys bigots. I said that what you were saying was thinly veiled racist rhetoric. I havent read enough of your junk to pass judgement on you personally, and if I had, I still wouldn’t pass judgement on you personally. I was talking about your ideas. so stop being meanies to me. or i’ll tell your mom.
In the meantime, I’d sure like to discuss some SPECIFIC examples/details of the satanist/muslim/communist/socialist/screaming lefty/pinko stuff you guys keep talking about that are so certain to destroy our union. You make judgements, but what are they based on? Talk about something real for fuck’s sake.
OL
[quote]orion wrote:
and maybe in 20 years some kind of WMD attack on LA happens and a charismatic leader will begin to use those powers and those that will be given the office until then in earnest.[/quote]
Yea - good idea. I’ll definitely spend the next 20 years worrying about that.
Thanks for the heads-up.
[quote]mjnewland wrote:
Trib, how about listing the exact ideologies that we have fought on and off the battlefield that Obama subscribes to?
HH: What does LMAO mean? I’m new here.
You know, I never called you guys bigots. I said that what you were saying was thinly veiled racist rhetoric. I havent read enough of your junk to pass judgement on you personally, and if I had, I still wouldn’t pass judgement on you personally. I was talking about your ideas. so stop being meanies to me. or i’ll tell your mom.
In the meantime, I’d sure like to discuss some SPECIFIC examples/details of the satanist/muslim/communist/socialist/screaming lefty/pinko stuff you guys keep talking about that are so certain to destroy our union. You make judgements, but what are they based on? Talk about something real for fuck’s sake.
OL[/quote]
We’ve been over this 200 times already. If you really care you can chase down some of my other posts.
I did respond to you in the other thread about your inquiry regarding my feelings about black folks. I will say one more time.
If racism is defined as viewing any person’s intelligence, dignity or intrinsic value as being a function of their race, ethnicity or physical characteristics, no lesser racist person lives on this Earth than I. I could not possibly care less what color somebody is.
[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
I don’t hate Barack Obama personally. I’ve even said that on occasion I’ve found him pleasant and likable. However he represents everything that is rotting this nation from the inside out, especially for black people.
[/quote]
I’m curious as to how Obama stands for everything that is bad for black people…and what by YOUR definition is best for black people?
[quote]Big_Boss wrote:
Tiribulus wrote:
I don’t hate Barack Obama personally. I’ve even said that on occasion I’ve found him pleasant and likable. However he represents everything that is rotting this nation from the inside out, especially for black people.
I’m curious as to how Obama stands for everything that is bad for black people…and what by YOUR definition is best for black people?
[/quote]
See now there’s your problem.
There is no such thing as what is best for black people as opposed to any other people. The principles of self determination and responsibility whereby one achieves whatever they can, or can’t, by their own abilities unencumbered or aided by anyone else through force of law is what made this country great for white people.
Bleeding heart WHITE liberals have robbed blacks of that same opportunity by attempting to artificially engineer a set of falsely advantageous circumstances different than the ones that elevated white people in this country.
Once they observed that not only blacks, but low income whites and hispanics as well could be made dependent on them and become a permanent loyal voting block it was over.
What might have begun as a misguided quest for justice then transformed into slavery 2.0 with race being only an incidental component. All low income people are welcome to join.
We have now arrived at the point where a very alarming percentage of black people, trained by decades of destructive condescending nanny state liberalism, view, not themselves, not their family, not even their God, but Barack Obama as the determiner of their futures.
It is pathetic and heartbreaking. Not even actual pre civil war slavery was as effective at destroying their spirit. Once you get a man to voluntarily surrender he’s lost in earnest. Slavery was unable to do that.
Liberalism has. That is the reason (one of em anyway) I view it as EVIL of the most genuine kind and those who propound it as wrong at best and sinister at worst.
[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
Big_Boss wrote:
Tiribulus wrote:
I don’t hate Barack Obama personally. I’ve even said that on occasion I’ve found him pleasant and likable. However he represents everything that is rotting this nation from the inside out, especially for black people.
I’m curious as to how Obama stands for everything that is bad for black people…and what by YOUR definition is best for black people?
See now there’s your problem.
There is no such thing as what is best for black people as opposed to any other people. The principles of self determination and responsibility whereby one achieves whatever they can, or can’t, by their own abilities unencumbered or aided by anyone else through force of law is what made this country great for white people.
[/quote]
If you truly believe this…then your comment above: "However he represents everything that is rotting this nation from the inside out, especially for black people." should not have specified anyone.
With that,you’re implying there is also what is best for black people…or am I just misquoting you?
Whatever “my problem is” was sparked by following your line of argument…nothing more.
EDIT
You’re actually starting to sound full of yourself with that rant.
You’re trying to tell me that liberalism has done more damage for black people than slavery ever could have?
So what did black people voluntarily surrender away…that was more valuable than freedom?? The thing that you hold closest to your own heart.
[quote]mjnewland wrote:
Hey everybody, thanks for coming!
20 years of angry black rhetoric is nothing compared to the 100+ years of hateful anti-black rhetoric. As evidenced by some of these posts.
Obama’s already hired a republican CoS (I remember when that asshole sununu was CoS, I’m glad he’s looking for work today…). I think that this administration has the potential to be the most bipartisan and progressive since the Great Depression.
I’m an American, and I root for the underdog. The Republican’s, for all their conservative “save-the-rich” mentality (GW sure is awfully cozy with oil…) could give a shit about the little guy. I think we have an administration that will do something for the little guy, besides putting them in indentured servitude like the Reps would.
X, follow your stuff on the T-cell, thanks for coming. I think I preferred your old avatar, tho…
Old Lardass[/quote]
If you don’t like being a little guy, be a big guy. Only one stopping you is you.
Don’t matter if it’s biceps or billfolds, hard work, determination, and drive pays and pays big.
[quote]mjnewland wrote:
Obama’s already hired a republican CoS…
Old Lardass[/quote]
Uh, he appointed Rahm Emanuel, the fourth-ranking Dem in the house.