Democracy in Action

Off Topic Politics and World Issues
21

[quote]Headhunter wrote:
Big_Boss wrote:
Headhunter wrote:

One of my student’s dad owns a store in Cleveland. Three businesses right by him were looted and burned. The dad sat in his store all night, with a gun.

Welcome to Obamaland…the rule of the unthinking mob, the rule of those who vote yet are immune to facts, as long as they get ‘change’.

I suspect the change they’ll get very soon is coins while begging.

And of course hurricanes and tornadoes will be Obama’s fault,too…so how’s the move to Colorado coming along!?

He only has a 54 to 46 majority in the Senate, so the Reps can filibuster any truly insane programs he comes up with. The destruction can be limited, unlike Carter who had 60 and FDR, who had 68, in 1937-1939.

A lot of libs have moved to Colorado :frowning: . I couldn’t get a good price now for our vacation home, but I wish it was in Wyoming.

[/quote]

Build it yourself…it will make you feel like an American again. Keep me in mind in the near future. You can hire me again. :stuck_out_tongue:

22

[quote]Big_Boss wrote:
Headhunter wrote:
Big_Boss wrote:
Headhunter wrote:

One of my student’s dad owns a store in Cleveland. Three businesses right by him were looted and burned. The dad sat in his store all night, with a gun.

Welcome to Obamaland…the rule of the unthinking mob, the rule of those who vote yet are immune to facts, as long as they get ‘change’.

I suspect the change they’ll get very soon is coins while begging.

And of course hurricanes and tornadoes will be Obama’s fault,too…so how’s the move to Colorado coming along!?

He only has a 54 to 46 majority in the Senate, so the Reps can filibuster any truly insane programs he comes up with. The destruction can be limited, unlike Carter who had 60 and FDR, who had 68, in 1937-1939.

A lot of libs have moved to Colorado :frowning: . I couldn’t get a good price now for our vacation home, but I wish it was in Wyoming.

Build it yourself…it will make you feel like an American again. Keep me in mind in the near future. You can hire me again. :P[/quote]

Winters there are a bitch. Better to use a local contractor who knows how to build for the area.

When unemployment hits 20% and food riots are hitting the cities hard (none of which is the fault of Obama, but the fault of altruism), let me know. I’ll hire you. =:)

23

[quote]koffea wrote:
Professor X wrote:
Why would people riot about losing an election? the only way people would even show that much emotion is if they pulled some “recount” bullshit where the decision was questionable.

This election wasn’t even close.

Why? I have no idea why. but the hard core obama supporters were telling us they would riot if he lost . . . with the blind obedience that has been demonstrated by a few (not the majority but a few) in my community I have no reason to doubt that they would have carried out this threat.

Not that this really matters now either, but there were also several stories in the news concerning the preperations that various police dept. around the nation were going through to prepare for riots should obama lose as well. [/quote]

Again, I would be more worried about all of the hate being expressed by those claiming to hate this president elect than I would some rhetoric by a few about riot claims.

Riots affect the people who are rioting worse than anyone else. Anyone who would conduct themselves that way shouldn’t be considered a representation of the majority.

I am not seeing, however, any attempt by McCain supporters to distance themselves from talk of this new president being an “enemy”.

24

[quote]Rockscar wrote:
Professor X wrote:
Big_Boss wrote:
Professor X wrote:
Big_Boss wrote:
koffea wrote:
I agree, however the only caveat to that, is that if he had not won, you know their would have been a lot of violence and riotes in numerous cities across the country.

The way people talk around here…you would think there would be riots because he won…or lynchings for some.

They are claiming he is their “enemy” yet they also accuse the other side of “possible riots”?

I would be more worried about the people claiming the US president is an enemy than I would some prediction of a riot that never happened.

yet the “other side” is speaking in ways that they usually deem “unpatriotic”…"un-American for others. They’re sounding like the terrorists they “know” will take over our country because of Obama. This country is overrun with fear mongers.

If you call a US president an “ENEMY” you are a terrorist.

That’s how they called it for years so why change it now?

Socialism and hate is the enemy. Nobody called Barack the enemy. His socialistic policies and his shady friends who say they wished they had BOMBED more, and the God #(#* America church that spewed hate toward the USA are definate enemies.

20 years of hatefull and racial sermons battered into Obamas head scares the hell out of me. His idea of a National Civilian Security force to monitor the “People” sounds a lot like the Gestapo or SS to me.

Ask not what you can do for your country…ask what your country can do for YOU!!! This is the Barack Theme so many were duped by. We will see.

[/quote]

Ayers did not say he wished they had bombed more, you have obviously not researched the subject, or what he said.

25

[quote]Headhunter wrote:
Big_Boss wrote:
Headhunter wrote:
Big_Boss wrote:
Headhunter wrote:

One of my student’s dad owns a store in Cleveland. Three businesses right by him were looted and burned. The dad sat in his store all night, with a gun.

Welcome to Obamaland…the rule of the unthinking mob, the rule of those who vote yet are immune to facts, as long as they get ‘change’.

I suspect the change they’ll get very soon is coins while begging.

And of course hurricanes and tornadoes will be Obama’s fault,too…so how’s the move to Colorado coming along!?

He only has a 54 to 46 majority in the Senate, so the Reps can filibuster any truly insane programs he comes up with. The destruction can be limited, unlike Carter who had 60 and FDR, who had 68, in 1937-1939.

A lot of libs have moved to Colorado :frowning: . I couldn’t get a good price now for our vacation home, but I wish it was in Wyoming.

Build it yourself…it will make you feel like an American again. Keep me in mind in the near future. You can hire me again. :stuck_out_tongue:

Winters there are a bitch. Better to use a local contractor who knows how to build for the area.

When unemployment hits 20% and food riots are hitting the cities hard (none of which is the fault of Obama, but the fault of altruism), let me know. I’ll hire you. =:)

[/quote]

You can’t if you’re in line with me…or can’t pay me…unless…well,nevermind :slight_smile:

26

[quote]Inner Hulk wrote:
Rockscar wrote:
Professor X wrote:
Big_Boss wrote:
Professor X wrote:
Big_Boss wrote:
koffea wrote:
I agree, however the only caveat to that, is that if he had not won, you know their would have been a lot of violence and riotes in numerous cities across the country.

The way people talk around here…you would think there would be riots because he won…or lynchings for some.

They are claiming he is their “enemy” yet they also accuse the other side of “possible riots”?

I would be more worried about the people claiming the US president is an enemy than I would some prediction of a riot that never happened.

yet the “other side” is speaking in ways that they usually deem “unpatriotic”…"un-American for others. They’re sounding like the terrorists they “know” will take over our country because of Obama. This country is overrun with fear mongers.

If you call a US president an “ENEMY” you are a terrorist.

That’s how they called it for years so why change it now?

Socialism and hate is the enemy. Nobody called Barack the enemy. His socialistic policies and his shady friends who say they wished they had BOMBED more, and the God #(#* America church that spewed hate toward the USA are definate enemies.

20 years of hatefull and racial sermons battered into Obamas head scares the hell out of me. His idea of a National Civilian Security force to monitor the “People” sounds a lot like the Gestapo or SS to me.

Ask not what you can do for your country…ask what your country can do for YOU!!! This is the Barack Theme so many were duped by. We will see.

Ayers did not say he wished they had bombed more, you have obviously not researched the subject, or what he said.[/quote]

So then how do you interprate a person who orchestrated bombings in the US when he says “I wish we had done more?”

Please explain.

27

[quote]Rockscar wrote:

So then how do you interprate words from a person who orchestrated bombings in the US when he says “I wish we had done more?”

Please explain.

[/quote]

You would “interpret” them just as they are, non-specific implications that they wish they had done more…which could be anything until it is clarified.

The better question is why you are playing mind reader and then using your futuristic powers of foresight to label a man who simply knew the one you are making predictions for?

28

University of Illinois-Chicago is a terrorist cell…they should be wiped off American soil.

29

[quote]Rockscar wrote:
Inner Hulk wrote:
Rockscar wrote:
Professor X wrote:
Big_Boss wrote:
Professor X wrote:
Big_Boss wrote:
koffea wrote:
I agree, however the only caveat to that, is that if he had not won, you know their would have been a lot of violence and riotes in numerous cities across the country.

The way people talk around here…you would think there would be riots because he won…or lynchings for some.

They are claiming he is their “enemy” yet they also accuse the other side of “possible riots”?

I would be more worried about the people claiming the US president is an enemy than I would some prediction of a riot that never happened.

yet the “other side” is speaking in ways that they usually deem “unpatriotic”…"un-American for others. They’re sounding like the terrorists they “know” will take over our country because of Obama. This country is overrun with fear mongers.

If you call a US president an “ENEMY” you are a terrorist.

That’s how they called it for years so why change it now?

Socialism and hate is the enemy. Nobody called Barack the enemy. His socialistic policies and his shady friends who say they wished they had BOMBED more, and the God #(#* America church that spewed hate toward the USA are definate enemies.

20 years of hatefull and racial sermons battered into Obamas head scares the hell out of me. His idea of a National Civilian Security force to monitor the “People” sounds a lot like the Gestapo or SS to me.

Ask not what you can do for your country…ask what your country can do for YOU!!! This is the Barack Theme so many were duped by. We will see.

Ayers did not say he wished they had bombed more, you have obviously not researched the subject, or what he said.

So then how do you interprate a person who orchestrated bombings in the US when he says “I wish we had done more?”

Please explain.

[/quote]

William Ayers clarified, years ago, what he meant by what he said. He also wrote apologies to people who were injured in the attacks. He has also said his Weatherman group was “arrogant”.

Google is your friend.

30

[quote]Inner Hulk wrote:

Google is your friend.[/quote]

Actually Google is the enemy…depends on how you look at it. People soak up what suits they’re own agenda…nobody has an open mind anymore. Lots of garbage on the internet…as PWI has recently proven.

31

[quote]Professor X wrote:
I am not seeing, however, any attempt by McCain supporters to distance themselves from talk of this new president being an “enemy”.[/quote]

well you can see me do it right now. I dont think that obama is the enemy. He may prove to be a great president. Only time will tell. I have hopes for the best, but I am also making preperations for the worst based on bidens, pelosi, and reids record. He could help calm a lot of the fear shared by many conservatives by standing up to these three individuals and not rubber stamp everything they put in front of him. Nothing to do but wait and see what he actually does now.

32

[quote]Big_Boss wrote:
Inner Hulk wrote:

Google is your friend.

Actually Google is the enemy…depends on how you look at it. People soak up what suits they’re own agenda…nobody has an open mind anymore. Lots of garbage on the internet…as PWI has recently proven.

[/quote]

Google is not the enemy, so long as one knows how to cross reference and fact check then it’s quite easy to sort through the garbage.

33

[quote]Professor X wrote:
Rockscar wrote:

So then how do you interprate words from a person who orchestrated bombings in the US when he says “I wish we had done more?”

Please explain.

You would “interpret” them just as they are, non-specific implications that they wish they had done more…which could be anything until it is clarified.

The better question is why you are playing mind reader and then using your futuristic powers of foresight to label a man who simply knew the one you are making predictions for?[/quote]

Not mind reader, just very concerned. Would it be fair to assume that the blind acceptace of Ayers as a regular dude without doubt be just as flawed as anything I myself interprate from him?

34

Hey everybody, thanks for coming!

20 years of angry black rhetoric is nothing compared to the 100+ years of hateful anti-black rhetoric. As evidenced by some of these posts.

Obama’s already hired a republican CoS (I remember when that asshole sununu was CoS, I’m glad he’s looking for work today…). I think that this administration has the potential to be the most bipartisan and progressive since the Great Depression.

I’m an American, and I root for the underdog. The Republican’s, for all their conservative “save-the-rich” mentality (GW sure is awfully cozy with oil…) could give a shit about the little guy. I think we have an administration that will do something for the little guy, besides putting them in indentured servitude like the Reps would.

X, follow your stuff on the T-cell, thanks for coming. I think I preferred your old avatar, tho…

Old Lardass

35

[quote]Big_Boss wrote:
University of Illinois-Chicago is a terrorist cell…they should be wiped off American soil.[/quote]

Well, pretty much…yeah…

j/k

36

[quote]Inner Hulk wrote:

William Ayers clarified, years ago, what he meant by what he said. He also wrote apologies to people who were injured in the attacks. He has also said his Weatherman group was “arrogant”.

Google is your friend.[/quote]

Well, I suppose those injured folks can take a lot of comfort in all that.

Alternatively, he should be put on trial and then shot. I think that’s a somewhat better outcome.

37

[quote]Inner Hulk wrote:
Big_Boss wrote:
Inner Hulk wrote:

Google is your friend.

Actually Google is the enemy…depends on how you look at it. People soak up what suits they’re own agenda…nobody has an open mind anymore. Lots of garbage on the internet…as PWI has recently proven.

Google is not the enemy, so long as one knows how to cross reference and fact check then it’s quite easy to sort through the garbage.[/quote]

well that ties into what I was getting at. Like I said,people only soak up what makes them feel “knowledgeable” for their own agendas.

38

[quote]mjnewland wrote:
Hey everybody, thanks for coming!

20 years of angry black rhetoric is nothing compared to the 100+ years of hateful anti-black rhetoric. As evidenced by some of these posts.

Obama’s already hired a republican CoS (I remember when that asshole sununu was CoS, I’m glad he’s looking for work today…). I think that this administration has the potential to be the most bipartisan and progressive since the Great Depression.

I’m an American, and I root for the underdog. The Republican’s, for all their conservative “save-the-rich” mentality (GW sure is awfully cozy with oil…) could give a shit about the little guy. I think we have an administration that will do something for the little guy, besides putting them in indentured servitude like the Reps would.

X, follow your stuff on the T-cell, thanks for coming. I think I preferred your old avatar, tho…

Old Lardass[/quote]

Only someone of the intellect of most Obama supporters could find any racism in here…unless you equate ‘naming facts’ with ‘racism’, which is not beyond most Obamaniacs.

Who the hell hires you people? And for what? To imitate plant life?

39

HH, I?ll respond like this:

Old Lardass? List of Rascist Comments on This Thread:

Koffea: is that if he had not won, you know their would have been a lot of violence and riotes in numerous cities across the country.

HeadHunter: One of my student’s dad owns a store in Cleveland. Three businesses right by him were looted and burned. The dad sat in his store all night, with a gun. [[q- when did this happen?]]

Welcome to Obamaland…the rule of the unthinking mob, the rule of those who vote yet are immune to facts, as long as they get ‘change’.

HeadHunter:: He and his fellow satanists bought the election, from a bunch of people who have no thought of country…

And HH: I suspect the change they’ll get very soon is coins while begging.

Fuck, Head, you win the racist comment prize!

As for who hires us, I’d say the smart rich people did.

xoxoxo
OL

40

[quote]mjnewland wrote:
HH, I?ll respond like this:

Old Lardass? List of Rascist Comments on This Thread:

Koffea: is that if he had not won, you know their would have been a lot of violence and riotes in numerous cities across the country.

HeadHunter: One of my student’s dad owns a store in Cleveland. Three businesses right by him were looted and burned. The dad sat in his store all night, with a gun. [[q- when did this happen?]]

Welcome to Obamaland…the rule of the unthinking mob, the rule of those who vote yet are immune to facts, as long as they get ‘change’.

HeadHunter:: He and his fellow satanists bought the election, from a bunch of people who have no thought of country…

And HH: I suspect the change they’ll get very soon is coins while begging.

Fuck, Head, you win the racist comment prize!

As for who hires us, I’d say the smart rich people did.

xoxoxo
OL
[/quote]

There is nothing racist about my comment. You imply that all hard core obama supporters were of a singular race. I have not found that to be true. What i have found to be true is that the extremists on the left, which (and I cant believe i actually have to say this) are of all races, do tend to take to the streets when emotions run high.

Furthermore, this was not just my oppinion it was also the oppinion of numerous police departments across america. Also, I work with some of these lunatics (all of whome are white) who told me they would riot if he did not win. So please, explain to me how my comment was racist.