Damage Control

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:

Don’t be afraid of animal fat. There is nothing unhealthy about fat from high quality meats. They are not bad for your heart or body composition. For ground beef I get grass-fed with the HIGHEST fat content I can find. For chicken I eat free range with the skin included. I don’t throw out any egg yokes (the part of the egg with all the good nutrition) from eggs I raise myself. I drink only grass fed whole milk.

I cook just about all my food from eggs to veggies in organic uncured bacon grease, coconut oil, or grass-fed butter. And my risk factors for heart disease, my strength, and my body composition are all better than they’ve ever been.[/quote]
Same here! And damn, does food taste so much better now.

Ok, I swear I’m not doing this just to be difficult. But the whole ‘lower your carbs. up fats while cutting’ works for some, but not others. I tried that and ended up NEVER getting as lean as I did using higher carbs. I think it works for some, and definitely don’t be ‘afraid’ of fats. But also don’t be ‘afraid’ of carbs just because your cutting. If you hit the protein and fat minimums, it’s probably not going to matter if you use a higher carb, higher fat, or moderate carb/fat distribution in reality. You need to just find what works for you.

DoubleDuce is a dude who does REALLY well with higher fats and almost no carbs, as did MODOK years ago. I do much better higher carbs and lowish fats, and so does Ryanxc on here. All of us have gotten pretty lean. So figure out what works for you, but don’t just drop carbs just because you think a macro breakdown of 150C/250P/200F is better than 300C/250P/130F because low carb = more fat loss. Do what suits your physiological and psychological preferences, but nothing else really matters.

As a person who has been fairly lean, fat, and everywhere in between I will say you have some work ahead of you, but nothing insurmountable. Like others have noted, I am a little thrown off by the large weight gain with relatively small strength gain. My strength always soars with weight gain, but I know everyone is different.

Play with your macros and see what gets you results. Everything in life is a learning experience, so do your best to learn as much as you can from this journey and apply it in the future. You have been given some good advice now time to try it out! =)

[quote]Spidey22 wrote:
Ok, I swear I’m not doing this just to be difficult. But the whole ‘lower your carbs. up fats while cutting’ works for some, but not others. I tried that and ended up NEVER getting as lean as I did using higher carbs. I think it works for some, and definitely don’t be ‘afraid’ of fats. But also don’t be ‘afraid’ of carbs just because your cutting. If you hit the protein and fat minimums, it’s probably not going to matter if you use a higher carb, higher fat, or moderate carb/fat distribution in reality. You need to just find what works for you.

DoubleDuce is a dude who does REALLY well with higher fats and almost no carbs, as did MODOK years ago. I do much better higher carbs and lowish fats, and so does Ryanxc on here. All of us have gotten pretty lean. So figure out what works for you, but don’t just drop carbs just because you think a macro breakdown of 150C/250P/200F is better than 300C/250P/130F because low carb = more fat loss. Do what suits your physiological and psychological preferences, but nothing else really matters. [/quote]

I’d point out a couple of things. I agree, plenty of people stay lean with high carbs. And even further, for someone who is very insulin sensitive there is little difference in low carb vs low fat. However, there are a large number of people that because they’ve burned out glucose for energy pathways, do far far far better on high fat diets. I also think high fat low carb diets will work for the vast majority of people. The catch is that you have to make your body learn to run on fat. For an insulin sensitive person whose body is using sugar well, they will see a big drop on in energy and performance for a time while they adjust, which is something most aren’t willing go through, so they add carbs back in. But for someone whose body isn’t using sugar well, there really isn’t a big drop of in energy (because they are feeding their body sugar it can’t use well so their energy already sucks), and as their body adapts, energy/focus/performance begin to increase. These are the people you are talking about doing well on high fat. Or at least, that’s my theory.

Spidey, I don’t know how pudgy you ever got, but looking at the pictures of the OP, I’m willing to bet he isn’t using sugar well. And for the record, if you are lean/insulin sensitive and preforming/looking like you want, then it probably doesn’t make sense to change to high fat.

But the other thing to consider is health. I eat the way I do now for health reasons. Specifically for heart health. Carbs are largely the driver for cancer and heart disease. Again, for someone with insulin sensitive with lower blood sugar levels, it probably isn’t a big deal either way, but it’s something to think about.

Then again, I’m a guy that thinks stay anabolic all the time is a really bad thing… hah.

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:

[quote]Spidey22 wrote:
Ok, I swear I’m not doing this just to be difficult. But the whole ‘lower your carbs. up fats while cutting’ works for some, but not others. I tried that and ended up NEVER getting as lean as I did using higher carbs. I think it works for some, and definitely don’t be ‘afraid’ of fats. But also don’t be ‘afraid’ of carbs just because your cutting. If you hit the protein and fat minimums, it’s probably not going to matter if you use a higher carb, higher fat, or moderate carb/fat distribution in reality. You need to just find what works for you.

DoubleDuce is a dude who does REALLY well with higher fats and almost no carbs, as did MODOK years ago. I do much better higher carbs and lowish fats, and so does Ryanxc on here. All of us have gotten pretty lean. So figure out what works for you, but don’t just drop carbs just because you think a macro breakdown of 150C/250P/200F is better than 300C/250P/130F because low carb = more fat loss. Do what suits your physiological and psychological preferences, but nothing else really matters. [/quote]

I’d point out a couple of things. I agree, plenty of people stay lean with high carbs. And even further, for someone who is very insulin sensitive there is little difference in low carb vs low fat. However, there are a large number of people that because they’ve burned out glucose for energy pathways, do far far far better on high fat diets. I also think high fat low carb diets will work for the vast majority of people. The catch is that you have to make your body learn to run on fat. For an insulin sensitive person whose body is using sugar well, they will see a big drop on in energy and performance for a time while they adjust, which is something most aren’t willing go through, so they add carbs back in. But for someone whose body isn’t using sugar well, there really isn’t a big drop of in energy (because they are feeding their body sugar it can’t use well so their energy already sucks), and as their body adapts, energy/focus/performance begin to increase. These are the people you are talking about doing well on high fat. Or at least, that’s my theory.

Spidey, I don’t know how pudgy you ever got, but looking at the pictures of the OP, I’m willing to bet he isn’t using sugar well. And for the record, if you are lean/insulin sensitive and preforming/looking like you want, then it probably doesn’t make sense to change to high fat.

But the other thing to consider is health. I eat the way I do now for health reasons. Specifically for heart health. Carbs are largely the driver for cancer and heart disease. Again, for someone with insulin sensitive with lower blood sugar levels, it probably isn’t a big deal either way, but it’s something to think about.
[/quote]

I think we are in agreement mostly. I think constant insulin spikes aren’t ideal. I initially felt I didn’t handle carbs well, but managing and controlling my intake of them helped me a lot My first meal or two during the day are carbless, and high in fat. I’ve had a lot of success with carb cycling, CBL, and IF in that regard.

I do think periods of ‘lower’ carbs can help one with kind of ‘resetting’ their insulin sensitivity. However, I also don’t think 'fat = insulin insensitive" if that makes sense. My point to him was just find what works, and don’t get caught up in making an ‘ideal’ macro plan, and simply starting somewhere and making adjustments as he goes. Like he said he’d start with certain macros, and people are like “lower the carbs”. I just don’t think it’s necessary at this point for him to worry about, at least not yet.

[quote]Spidey22 wrote:

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:

[quote]Spidey22 wrote:
Ok, I swear I’m not doing this just to be difficult. But the whole ‘lower your carbs. up fats while cutting’ works for some, but not others. I tried that and ended up NEVER getting as lean as I did using higher carbs. I think it works for some, and definitely don’t be ‘afraid’ of fats. But also don’t be ‘afraid’ of carbs just because your cutting. If you hit the protein and fat minimums, it’s probably not going to matter if you use a higher carb, higher fat, or moderate carb/fat distribution in reality. You need to just find what works for you.

DoubleDuce is a dude who does REALLY well with higher fats and almost no carbs, as did MODOK years ago. I do much better higher carbs and lowish fats, and so does Ryanxc on here. All of us have gotten pretty lean. So figure out what works for you, but don’t just drop carbs just because you think a macro breakdown of 150C/250P/200F is better than 300C/250P/130F because low carb = more fat loss. Do what suits your physiological and psychological preferences, but nothing else really matters. [/quote]

I’d point out a couple of things. I agree, plenty of people stay lean with high carbs. And even further, for someone who is very insulin sensitive there is little difference in low carb vs low fat. However, there are a large number of people that because they’ve burned out glucose for energy pathways, do far far far better on high fat diets. I also think high fat low carb diets will work for the vast majority of people. The catch is that you have to make your body learn to run on fat. For an insulin sensitive person whose body is using sugar well, they will see a big drop on in energy and performance for a time while they adjust, which is something most aren’t willing go through, so they add carbs back in. But for someone whose body isn’t using sugar well, there really isn’t a big drop of in energy (because they are feeding their body sugar it can’t use well so their energy already sucks), and as their body adapts, energy/focus/performance begin to increase. These are the people you are talking about doing well on high fat. Or at least, that’s my theory.

Spidey, I don’t know how pudgy you ever got, but looking at the pictures of the OP, I’m willing to bet he isn’t using sugar well. And for the record, if you are lean/insulin sensitive and preforming/looking like you want, then it probably doesn’t make sense to change to high fat.

But the other thing to consider is health. I eat the way I do now for health reasons. Specifically for heart health. Carbs are largely the driver for cancer and heart disease. Again, for someone with insulin sensitive with lower blood sugar levels, it probably isn’t a big deal either way, but it’s something to think about.
[/quote]

I think we are in agreement mostly. I think constant insulin spikes aren’t ideal. I initially felt I didn’t handle carbs well, but managing and controlling my intake of them helped me a lot My first meal or two during the day are carbless, and high in fat. I’ve had a lot of success with carb cycling, CBL, and IF in that regard.

I do think periods of ‘lower’ carbs can help one with kind of ‘resetting’ their insulin sensitivity. However, I also don’t think 'fat = insulin insensitive" if that makes sense. My point to him was just find what works, and don’t get caught up in making an ‘ideal’ macro plan, and simply starting somewhere and making adjustments as he goes. Like he said he’d start with certain macros, and people are like “lower the carbs”. I just don’t think it’s necessary at this point for him to worry about, at least not yet. [/quote]

Completely fair. And I was really responding to his statement about chicken breast and 1% milk. It seems by nature (due to the misinformation of the past couple decades) when people try to cut calories they start cutting fat, and I think that is generally a mistake. It many times means you cut out nutrients, decrease satiety/increase hunger, and increase questionable ingredients. Low fat products are, by nature, more highly processes, lower in any fat soluble vitamins, and often include sketchy replacement ingredients (like trans fat).

Definitely experiment and find what works and more importantly is sustainable for you. BUT, plenty of people can lose fat by eating very high fat diets and for a large number of people, it works much better. To the point some people almost can’t lose fat while consuming carbs.

Back when I was tracking everything and losing weight I was generally at about 60-70% of my calories from fat. I should be around that nowadays to, but I don’t really count. I more wanted to note that “do what works” may mean really high fat and he shouldn’t be scared of that.

Thanks so much for all of the information in here, everyone. I’ll stick where I’m at for at least a week or two. If it’s not working I’ll try lowering the carbohydrates and see if that changes anything. @Bauber and others who have asked about the strength gains thing: I know it looks like I gained next to no strength in all that time, but the pics CC put up really don’t do me justice. The first post was from right after I finished SS and was hitting the big lifts very frequently. The second post was just me being fair and not assuming I could bench/squat/deadlift this or that much as I hadn’t actually trained any of those lifts in that 8 month or so time-span. I was really just saying, “Oh, I can at least lift…” I keep a log for DC and went back and checked my progression because you guys got me questioning if I could truly claim I’d gotten stronger and I think I’ve done alright.

For instance, last night I used the 70’s for shoulder press and hit 22 reps rest-paused. Hell, I used to not even be able to DB bench the 70’s. My HS flat press has gone from an embarrassing 180x15 to 310x17 last night. My preacher curls, lat pull-downs, and CG bench have all gone up about 30lbs in the past few cycles. So, about a month and a half. On CG bench I hit 215x11 rest-paused last time. I was at 185x12 before. So, I know these numbers aren’t great compared to some of you other guys, but it isn’t like I’m not progressing at all. Most of my lifts have gone up at least 30lbs in a couple of months.

I haven’t performed flat bench in a bit but I love decline bench. I hit 225x12rp a month ago but irritated an injury of mine and backed off. Last time I got 235x22 rest-paused. So, next time I’m going for at least 260. Anyways, that’s just for your guys’ knowledge and enjoyment. I’ll be updating my log soon so stop by if you guys feel like it.

Sorry for kicking that off. I spent the last several months not training any of the powerlifts, so any changes I made there are a little lackluster too. I made progress too, just not by those measures.

Do you have better photos for comparison?

I believe that whenever you stall just choose a macro to drop. When gaining a good balance between the three macros is usually optimal but when dieting some people keep protein and carbs the same but start dropping fat until reaching the minimum they need and then start dropping carbs or vice versa. So just start dropping whichever macro you feel is less beneficial to you personally whenever you plateau. I’d personally drop to around 60 grams of fat first and when that stalls then start decreasing carbs as needed. You can do it however you want though.

[quote]LoRez wrote:
Sorry for kicking that off. I spent the last several months not training any of the powerlifts, so any changes I made there are a little lackluster too. I made progress too, just not by those measures.

Do you have better photos for comparison?[/quote]

Hey, it’s no problem. I just didn’t want people to think I was just screwing around in the gym. As for the photos, I was wanting to throw some pics up of me before I gained the weight to show you guys what I was working with. That might take some time though. I can get a current pic up by tomorrow.

[quote]myself1992 wrote:
I believe that whenever you stall just choose a macro to drop. When gaining a good balance between the three macros is usually optimal but when dieting some people keep protein and carbs the same but start dropping fat until reaching the minimum they need and then start dropping carbs or vice versa. So just start dropping whichever macro you feel is less beneficial to you personally whenever you plateau. I’d personally drop to around 60 grams of fat first and when that stalls then start decreasing carbs as needed. You can do it however you want though.[/quote]

Okay, I’ll try this and see what happens. I feel like I’ll inevitably have to drop the carbohydrates, but I’ll wait a bit on that.

Dont train like a competing bodybuilder who’s (at HIS level) essentially trying to maximise muscle fullness while dieting down for game day so he can come in 4 pounds heavier then last contest and look better under the lights, if you’re still building a foundation of muscle - which will contribute to the “bulk” of your mass. You have got to train the main lifts and track your strength levels. If youre gaining a ton of weight you BETTER gain a lot of strength or youre setting yourself up for fat gain, sorry.If you just want to gain 10 pounds for a school reunion to fill out your suit a bit better then strength gain is irrelevant.

[quote]LoRez wrote:
Sorry for kicking that off. I spent the last several months not training any of the powerlifts, so any changes I made there are a little lackluster too. I made progress too, just not by those measures.

Do you have better photos for comparison?[/quote]