The oldest experiment for creatine found that wild foxes found in the chase had 10 times the amount of creatine in the muscle than ones found in captivity. 10 TIMES! Has no-one noticed before this is a hell of a lot more. The amount scientifically studied that we can increase by supplementation is hardly anything compared to that.
My theory or speculation is that by increasing anaerobic activity dramatically, comparable to a wild fox from captive one, you could dramatically increase your creatine storage capacity.
Have searched on google a bit and could find nothing to indicate this from contemporary research. However if we function much like a fox muscle wise then maybe this is a probability.
Imagine having ten times the amount of creatine stored than a sedentary individual.
[quote]Boffin wrote:
how much more anaerobic activity does a wild fox do? I would have thought most of the time it would be doing aerobic stuff.[/quote]
Probably not, its either walking through the woods (or wherever), then sprinting after a rabbit (or other small mammal). So it’s either walking or sprinting, sounds like HIIT to me. That’s anaerobic.
[quote]PozzSka wrote:
Boffin wrote:
how much more anaerobic activity does a wild fox do? I would have thought most of the time it would be doing aerobic stuff.
Probably not, its either walking through the woods (or wherever), then sprinting after a rabbit (or other small mammal). So it’s either walking or sprinting, sounds like HIIT to me. That’s anaerobic. [/quote]
I doubt if it gets close to HIIT protocol, though I’d admit some of the sprints would be anaerobic.