Yet few people actually use the more/most structure. The fact she disagrees with modern vernacular doesn’t preclude its use.
So because people don’t know a words proper use we are just going to change it? That’s nice. No wonder we are raising a generation stupider than the previous one. Next you’re going to tell me irregardless is a word because people use it a lot.
Yet few people actually use the more/most structure. The fact she disagrees with modern vernacular doesn’t preclude its use.
[/quote]
The fact a dictionary puts a word in its pages doesn’t make it proper English. [/quote]
The fact some old lady from a previous era doesn’t find it proper does not make it so either. You seem like the last guy that would be pointing out improper English usage. Well, second to last.
Although this kind of crap may appeal to the far-right base, it is an example of the approach many reasonable people simply won’t abide, and an example of why the republican party is growing smaller. I assure you that ‘Reagan-like’ conservatives consider themselves above this garbage. We have many discussions about ‘moral decline’; this is an excellent example.
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
She is stupid but her fans are even stupider. [/quote]
Coulter is a very intelligent woman that plays her base like a tiny violin.
Your use of, “Stupider,” Is hilarious by the way…[/quote]
Your use of commas is at least as stupid as stupider, just so we are clear on all this grammar/spelling/punctuation stuff.
[/quote]
I wasn’t calling someone stupid with a word that doesn’t exist…
Edit: To be clear, I wasn’t giving zecarlo a hard time over his spelling or grammar. I was pointing out how ridiculous it is to use a word that doesn’t exist to call someone stupid.
Yet few people actually use the more/most structure. The fact she disagrees with modern vernacular doesn’t preclude its use.
So because people don’t know a words proper use we are just going to change it? That’s nice. No wonder we are raising a generation stupider than the previous one. Next you’re going to tell me irregardless is a word because people use it a lot.[/quote]
Should not it be “word’s”?
[quote]BlueCollarTr8n wrote:
Although this kind of crap may appeal to the far-right base, it is an example of the approach many reasonable people simply won’t abide, and an example of why the republican party is growing smaller. I assure you that ‘Reagan-like’ conservatives consider themselves above this garbage. We have many discussions about ‘moral decline’; this is an excellent example. [/quote]
This is a good post.
What she is saying is spot on. However the way she said has completely ruined it. The focus will now be on how she “represents” all conservatives and the Bam defenders will detract from the greater point by, rightfully, attacking her.
So while yes, this will increase her book sales, and what she is trying to say is correct, Putin pwned Obama here, it actually hurts us as a whole.