[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]Testy1 wrote:
You seem like the last guy that would be pointing out improper English usage. Well, second to last.[/quote]
dat ad hom…
[/quote]
Just messin wit cha
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Testy1 wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]Testy1 wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
She is stupid but her fans are even stupider. [/quote]
Coulter is a very intelligent woman that plays her base like a tiny violin.
Your use of, “Stupider,” Is hilarious by the way…[/quote]
Doh! stupider - Wiktionary
[/quote]
I trust this lady over wiki[/quote]
Yet few people actually use the more/most structure. The fact she disagrees with modern vernacular doesn’t preclude its use.
So because people don’t know a words proper use we are just going to change it? That’s nice. No wonder we are raising a generation stupider than the previous one. Next you’re going to tell me irregardless is a word because people use it a lot.[/quote]
Should not it be “word’s”? [/quote]
Probably.
Nevermind.
[quote]Testy1 wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]Testy1 wrote:
You seem like the last guy that would be pointing out improper English usage. Well, second to last.[/quote]
dat ad hom…
[/quote]
Just messin wit cha
[/quote]
I know, the posts on this thread are a perfect microcosm of what will happen with her statements. Literally couldn’t have played out any better.
She has always been a little skebipity. NTTAWWT.
Gee, no offense, but if this woman is being related to the conservative party, how is it people don’t understand the accusations of racism?
[quote]Professor X wrote:
Gee, no offense, but if this woman is being related to the conservative party, how is it people don’t understand the accusations of racism?
[/quote]
Because one person speaks for all of conservatism?
It took 15 posts on grammar and spelling to help me understand why we can agree on nothing - much less Conservative vs Liberal agendas…
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
Gee, no offense, but if this woman is being related to the conservative party, how is it people don’t understand the accusations of racism?
[/quote]
Because one person speaks for all of conservatism?
[/quote]
I mean…that is how it works for us, right?
[quote]Professor X wrote:
Gee, no offense, but if this woman is being related to the conservative party, how is it people don’t understand the accusations of racism?
[/quote]
Probably through the “nothing personal, it’s just…” rationale.
These pundits say some ridiculous things about people then justify it by saying “Hey, It’s nothing personal. It’s Just (____________) .”.
And truly it isn’t anything personal. They would say the same types of things about anybody who falls into their cross hairs.
[quote]SkyzykS wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
Gee, no offense, but if this woman is being related to the conservative party, how is it people don’t understand the accusations of racism?
[/quote]
Probably through the “nothing personal, it’s just…” rationale.
These pundits say some ridiculous things about people then justify it by saying “Hey, It’s nothing personal. It’s Just (____________) .”.
And truly it isn’t anything personal. They would say the same types of things about anybody who falls into their cross hairs.
[/quote]
BS.
NO offense because I see where you are coming from…I just know for a fact the same types of people who think Jesse Jackson speaks for all of us are the same ones acting like they aren’t racist when their “spokespeople” say shit like this.
I don’t hear you all on the news “denouncing” what she said either…like what was thrown at me as afar as what Jackson says.
Double Standards a’plenty.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]SkyzykS wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
Gee, no offense, but if this woman is being related to the conservative party, how is it people don’t understand the accusations of racism?
[/quote]
Probably through the “nothing personal, it’s just…” rationale.
These pundits say some ridiculous things about people then justify it by saying “Hey, It’s nothing personal. It’s Just (____________) .”.
And truly it isn’t anything personal. They would say the same types of things about anybody who falls into their cross hairs.
[/quote]
BS.
NO offense because I see where you are coming from…I just know for a fact the same types of people who think Jesse Jackson speaks for all of us are the same ones acting like they aren’t racist when their “spokespeople” say shit like this.
I don’t hear you all on the news “denouncing” what she said either…like what was thrown at me as afar as what Jackson says.
Double Standards a’plenty.
[/quote]
If we are being intellectually honest conservatives need to own this. It’s a damn shame, but a lot of people see her comments as indicative of all conservative thought much like Jesses Jackson’s comments are indicative of the black community.
There are a lot of people that obviously see her comments and Jacksons comments for what they are, but there are also a lot of people with the mentality X is pointing out. We’ve seen it on here in recent weeks.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
Gee, no offense, but if this woman is being related to the conservative party, how is it people don’t understand the accusations of racism?
[/quote]
Because one person speaks for all of conservatism?
[/quote]
I mean…that is how it works for us, right?[/quote]
No, it isn’t how it works. I’m consistently applying that rationale.
As for denouncing the word choice or her, note the thread title. As a “conservative” I’m not only “owning” it, I am flat out saying she is wrong here. I started the thread to highlight her poor choices. If that isn’t coming out and denouncing her behavior on behalf of those of us who don’t want to be falsely labeled, I don’t know what is.
I also brought up when the left compares Bush43 to a monkey, crickets on that one.
Anyway, the point is, Putin made (is making) Obama look like an incompetent communities organizer who has no place as an executive. Coulter, looking to spark the ire, is fucking that observation up here, and she has made a massive mistake, because just like you did, all people will focus on is “monkey”, not the fact this whole thing, is really bad for our country. And when I say really bad, I’m not talking about her faux racism to perk up the ears of those searching for the dog whistle.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
No, it isn’t how it works. I’m consistently applying that rationale.
[/quote]
LOL
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]SkyzykS wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
Gee, no offense, but if this woman is being related to the conservative party, how is it people don’t understand the accusations of racism?
[/quote]
Probably through the “nothing personal, it’s just…” rationale.
These pundits say some ridiculous things about people then justify it by saying “Hey, It’s nothing personal. It’s Just (____________) .”.
And truly it isn’t anything personal. They would say the same types of things about anybody who falls into their cross hairs.
[/quote]
BS.
NO offense because I see where you are coming from…I just know for a fact the same types of people who think Jesse Jackson speaks for all of us are the same ones acting like they aren’t racist when their “spokespeople” say shit like this.
I don’t hear you all on the news “denouncing” what she said either…like what was thrown at me as afar as what Jackson says.
Double Standards a’plenty.
[/quote]
None taken.
I don’t really get the Jesse Jackson thing. I thought that started out as a joke on South Park a couple of years ago.
I personally would not call Coulter a conservative. She backed Romney immediately, so she is not a “conservative.” People are using this term intertwined with Republican it is not. John McCain is a Republican, but a Conservative he is not. Ted Cruz is a Conservative that is a Republican.
Everytime I see Ann Coulter on tv I turn the channel. All she does is hock books.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
Gee, no offense, but if this woman is being related to the conservative party, how is it people don’t understand the accusations of racism?
[/quote]
Because one person speaks for all of conservatism?
[/quote]
I mean…that is how it works for us, right?[/quote]
No, it isn’t how it works. I’m consistently applying that rationale. [/quote]
Dude, get serious. This was just proven to you beyond a shadow of a doubt right herethat many people DO apparently think Jesse Jackson speaks for all black people.
Therefore, to be truly honest REQUIRES republicans to denounce this or be seen as agreeing with it.
Otherwise, I don’t want to hear Jesse or Sharpton thrown at me ever again on this site.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
Dude, get serious. This was just proven to you beyond a shadow of a doubt right herethat many people DO apparently think Jesse Jackson speaks for all black people.
Therefore, to be truly honest REQUIRES republicans to denounce this or be seen as agreeing with it.[/quote]
I’m not a republican, and I am denouncing it. It is at least 33% of the reason I made the thread. The other 67% is split between pointing out the double standard where Bush43 can be brutally defamed and no one cares, but Obama is untouchable, and the sad fact that Putin just pants Obama on the world stage and this clown and his water bearers in the press will spin it as his victory…
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/09/10/us-syria-crisis-russia-putin-idUSBRE98912H20130910
But at the same time, wouldn’t this logic call for wide scale denouncing of JJ or whoever the current Alynski tactic is pointed at?
[quote]
Otherwise, I don’t want to hear Jesse or Sharpton thrown at me ever again on this site.[/quote]
I don’t control other people. I don’t believe I have done this either. If I had I was wrong.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
Gee, no offense, but if this woman is being related to the conservative party, how is it people don’t understand the accusations of racism?
[/quote]
Yeah Ann Coulter is the face of racism as your major black populated cities run by liberal communist Democrats fester into bankruptcy, double digit unemployment for African Americans, and families torn apart by drugs and murder.
Meanwhile “let’s strike out, rape and murder white people” seems to be the continual theme since Obama was re-elected.
If you would clear the slate of your mind and think about what’s actually happening and who is in power in the cities that are failing, you might figure out who is really against you.
Don’t listen to what they say, it’s WHAT THEY DO. Actions speak louder…
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
I’m not a republican, and I am denouncing it. [/quote]
Wrong, you are making a post on a website with under 2,000 views.
Where are the “heads of the republicans” to denounce her in the media?
I mean, I don’t see anyone from that party putting this down on national tv.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
Where are the “heads of the republicans” to denounce her in the media?
I mean, I don’t see anyone from that party putting this down on national tv.[/quote]
Probably because they are well aware no one person speaks for the party as a whole, particularly someone who has been labeled and outspoken rabble rouser in the past.
Just like they don’t bother to address every lame “but da Rush Limbo” or “da faux newz” comments. It is an Alynski tactic, and there is no need to defend yourself if you didn’t make that remark.
How is you demanding this from “the republican party” any different than someone here asking you to “police the black communities”?