That actually looked legit, and I actually read it.
Nothing “science” doesn’t already know about the SARS type stuff, IMO. Granted, the media won’t cover it, and Biden definitely has no understanding of it, I’ll give you that.
They say looks can be deceiving…
Not the Malone guy, this:
I don’t follow Twitter, period.
3 Likes
Nothing to do with the study
Study link was in the post to.
Don’t be disingenuous. You posted the study via the guy’s twitter feed.
How have you remained sane in Covidworld? My field is more electrons than epidemics, so I don’t see too many self-styled experts. If I were a scientist in the field of medicine I’d have clawed my eyes out by now.
1 Like
This will never it seems, lmao. CNBC seems like the biggest sellers of vaccines. I wonder if they reached their yearly targets.
1 Like
I don’t have any doses. Do you think I can just get all four at once, or do I need to build my vaccine capacity first? Just think about the vaccine capacity some folks have already built. They may actually be able to inject bleach by this point.
The executive summary from that paper:
Vaccine effectiveness
Several studies of vaccine effectiveness have been conducted in the UK which indicate that 2
doses of vaccine are between 65 and 95% effective at preventing symptomatic disease with
COVID-19 with the Delta variant, with higher levels of protection against severe disease
including hospitalisation and death. There is some evidence of waning of protection against
infection and symptomatic disease over time, though protection against severe disease remains
high in most groups at least 5 months after the second dose.
If you Google uk.hsa number of deaths vaccinated you’ll get the free download with all the stats.
1 Like
My weather app gives an update on the new cases and new deaths due to Covid in my state. The new deaths # stood out to me just now because it was at 7; I don’t recall seeing a single digit number before.
I find the single digit new deaths # very Ominous…
Which we know is a lie.
I mean even CNN posted that every kind of protection starts wanning approximately 2 months after the 2nd dose. While the first months after the 2nd dose you are pretty vulnerable.
And we know that it is not between 65 and 95 %. It is 65 for the 2nd month after the 2nd dose and it rapidly wanes afterwards.
To sum it up. Vaccination = decreased protection after the 1st dose, decreased protection after the 2nd dose. Increased protection for 1 month after the 2nd month of the 2nd dose. Rapidly wanning protection with approximately 20 % per month afterwards.
Or in other words - vaccines are trading 2 month vulnerability (after 1st and 2nd dose) for 2-3 months of protection (month 3,4 and 5 after the 1st dose) and potential T cell damage and loss of general immunity and potentially lots of side effects. This is probably the worst trade off.
I wonder whether that’s why we didn’t have a vaccine for the common cold before…
You believe it’s a lie.
We’ll add ukhsa to your list of liars which seems to include ITU staff. Who else is on there? Is CNN on that list or not?
Did you read as far as table 1?
2 Likes
Do you have a source for this? I’m not going to debate anything to do with vaccines. Just want to know where these figures are from.
Unfortunately nope. I can only give doubts for faked research, which all pharma companies are guilty of in the past.
I believe I posted one for decreased immunity after the 1st dose, just recently.
Considering a fully vaccinated 80 (or even 70) y/old is still at a far, far higher risk of hospitalisation relative to an unvaccinated 25 y/old and some 90%+ of those 80+ are fully vaccinated this stat if true doesn’t surprise me…
It’s hilarious when people post shit like this, as if it’s a big “gotcha” moment… no it isn’t… old people are going to be hospitalised… and when you’ve got so many more vaccinated vs unvaccinated that discrepancy is eventually going to skew towards the vaccinated
Perhaps look at the stats for ICU patients in the Netherlands (80% unvaccinated) or UK…
If you had say… 99% of the eligiable population fully vaccinated as is present in ACT (Australian territory) you’ll probably find for the absolutely minuscule degree of hospitalisations that occur over the next year, most will be vaccinated… shocker!
Except vaccines only decrease the risk of hospitalisation by 80-90%… so no… obviously more vaccinated people are going to be hospitalised when 99% of the population is vaccinated
What about Germany? What percentage of those in ICU are unvaccinated? It’s around 90%…
2 Likes