Does the date of the story matter? Or is that irrelevant in your esteemed opinion?
Did not link the article I was reading at the time apparently. Iâll find it when I get home.
CNN is on par with Infowars and Stormfront, so get your sources right this time.
ROFLMFAO! (@ the hypocrite H_factor, not at chris_ottawa)
Yes, you linked it, it was from May. Now youâve erased it, because you acted just like all the politicos you sneer at with your walls of verbiage. Fyi, you can delete it, but itâs still there for a day so anyone who gives a flying fcuk can embrace your attempted deception.
Typical hypocrisyâŠ
1 Like
I deleted it because the story was old.
And exposed your ill-informed, uneducated (sound familiar?) snarky post based on said old story.
your erased attempt at âhumorâ: âCanât believe we are coming on a third wave. We are doing everything right.â
Not sure what your obsession with me is or why the pent up anger?
I call out fake news when I see it. Especially on something as important as Da Covid.
I never reply to your posts anymore dude, unlike your need for Strunk & White when you reply to my posts.
Just for the record, this is it:
I didnât delete it to hide it. Itâs not the first time Iâve messed up and wonât be the last.
1 Like
You canât anyway, so why mention it?
I know, fucking fun to read the news right now, right?
Need more Kayleigh.
Itâs funny how Sweden is doing so much better than all the countries that are locking down and crippling their economies, plus putting citizens through unnecessary hardship. How long before the mainstream media and politicians realize that Sweden was right all along?
Youâre wrong, but it doesnât matter. Weâve been through this multiple times, and you simply refuse to look at or digest any of the data that suggest you or Tegnell is wrong.
2 Likes
Sweden did have a lockdown of sorts. And you already knew this. You also already knew that most countriesâ lockdowns were anything but. The term lockdown essentially means nothing more than whatever the person using it wants it to mean.
1 Like
I havenât seen any such data actually. I have seen and heard arguments that suggest that, but they seem to be at odds with the data.
If you can actually prove that this is wrong then please do so, Iâm open to changing my mind but that requires actual facts. My opinion is based on the facts as I see them, and they do not support lockdowns and endless restrictions.
They had minimal restrictions, which have since been eased up.
True, but thatâs what the news is calling it. Either that or the more accurate term ârestrictionsâ. But what we had in the spring could definitely be called a lockdown, almost everything was closed, no more than 5 people not of the same household allowed in one house (in Quebec it was two), couldnât even sit on a park bench without getting a $880 fine. Then there are places where you canât go more than 5km from home, only allowed outside for an hour a day, etc.
There are some measures which make sense, and in most cases there is a more sensible and more effective way to implement them. But most of it really looks like arbitrary restrictions for no good reason, either due to incompetence or malevolence. Combine that with globalist assholes like the World Economic Forum and United Nations talking about the âGreat Resetâ and rebuilding the economy in accordance with their leftist insanity, it really doesnât look good at all.
Actually anti-lockdown crusaders are globalist assholes.
1 Like
How so?