Names being thrown around for the A&M job;
Sumlin at Houston
Strong at Louisville
Fedora at Southern Miss.
[quote]Derek542 wrote:
^ Nice[/quote]
I think that would look great on a helmet: maroon field, white “T” with grey star.
[quote]Tex Ag wrote:
Names being thrown around for the A&M job;
Sumlin at Houston
Strong at Louisville
Fedora at Southern Miss.
[/quote]
Yea no way they go with an NFL coach
The NFL coach in college fails more often than not. A lot of Nebraska fans looked at Sherman at TAMU and thought he would fare about as well there as Bill Callahan did here. Pretty similar results.
Looks.likes.Oregon should be able to hang at least 70 before the night is over.
I’m not actually in the Virgin Islands.
[quote]Christine wrote:
I’m not actually in the Virgin Islands.[/quote]
More importantly, are you a virgin ?
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
[quote]Christine wrote:
I’m not actually in the Virgin Islands.[/quote]
More importantly, are you a virgin ?[/quote]
Of course I am.
And I am telling you this on the internets, where no lies are permitted.
[quote]Christine wrote:
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
[quote]Christine wrote:
I’m not actually in the Virgin Islands.[/quote]
More importantly, are you a virgin ?[/quote]
Of course I am.
And I am telling you this on the internets, where no lies are permitted.[/quote]
Interwebz, the place of pure truth and lulz.
UCLA is playing better than I thought, but still going to lose. Now I have to hear how they lost because USC cheated, and they will brag about being Pac 12 South conference champions…with 7 losses.
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
UCLA is playing better than I thought, but still going to lose. Now I have to hear how they lost because USC cheated, and they will brag about being Pac 12 South conference champions…with 7 losses. [/quote]
a 6-7 team going to a bowl is laughable.
[quote]DixiesFinest wrote:
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
UCLA is playing better than I thought, but still going to lose. Now I have to hear how they lost because USC cheated, and they will brag about being Pac 12 South conference champions…with 7 losses. [/quote]
a 6-7 team going to a bowl is laughable.[/quote]
Asking for a waiver from the NCAA before the game is even played is laughable.
[quote]haas wrote:
[quote]DixiesFinest wrote:
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
UCLA is playing better than I thought, but still going to lose. Now I have to hear how they lost because USC cheated, and they will brag about being Pac 12 South conference champions…with 7 losses. [/quote]
a 6-7 team going to a bowl is laughable.[/quote]
Asking for a waiver from the NCAA before the game is even played is laughable.
[/quote]
This is true.
From what I understand, they have to petition to go to a bowl game, it is not automatic. Honestly, who would want to see this piece of shit team play anyway ?
Whatever.
Go Ducks!
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
[quote]haas wrote:
[quote]DixiesFinest wrote:
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
UCLA is playing better than I thought, but still going to lose. Now I have to hear how they lost because USC cheated, and they will brag about being Pac 12 South conference champions…with 7 losses. [/quote]
a 6-7 team going to a bowl is laughable.[/quote]
Asking for a waiver from the NCAA before the game is even played is laughable.
[/quote]
This is true.
From what I understand, they have to petition to go to a bowl game, it is not automatic. Honestly, who would want to see this piece of shit team play anyway ?
[/quote]
Fair enough, I was confused and thought they were already going.
[quote]Derek542 wrote:
You know had a long post trying to explain things to you, however you will never be able to see that you are being laughed at by everyone on here. You are not worth trying to make understand things.
Since you are obviously a RABID fan for Bama and its obvious you have never played the game and your whole emotional make up is wrapped into 18-20 year old kids playing football I will just put you on ignore.
You have not contributed anything to these boards EVER, you probably do not even lift. You Google college Football blogs, and jump on to thump your chest about your team. I know this cause nobody on here knows you, nobody on here even has had discussions with you. This is the third year we have had this thread and your post count shows what you contribute.
So with that said good luck sir, God bless. Dont worry about responding cause I will now put you on ignore and will not be able to see it.
DJ[/quote]
Just wow! That time of the month I guess? It’s hard to even make sense of this? If you had just ignored my post to start with instead of trying to jerk me around for fun because I don’t have the post count that impressed you, I wouldn’t have had to chase you into hiding. See ya
Now back to BCS bashing!
Welcome to Rematch Sat.
Whiskey beats Sparty for a Rose Bowl Birth.
In the ACC my head tells me the VT beats Clemson but I’m going with my gut.
LSU over Georgia.
OU over Ok. St. in a barn burner where the scoreboard guy develops carpel tunnel.
[quote]Derek542 wrote:
[quote]JoeGood wrote:
[quote]BamaGuy wrote:
[quote]Derek542 wrote:
[quote]BamaGuy wrote:
I am going to be dishing up some serious crow for a couple of posters when Bama gets in the NC game. [/quote]
Do you have a list[/quote]
Funny you should ask . . . [/quote]
Why?
Dude I’m a Bama Alum and I’d love to see Bama in the NC game but you have to admit theres compelling reasons for both putting them in as well as keeping them out.
[/quote]
Cant argue with a pirate, just not possible.
For the record I would not want to see the rematch.
Why?
Well cause it is supposed to be set up in my eyes as the best of the best from different conferences. Bama had its chance to win its division and they lost.
So Big 12, Pac 10, or Big 10 whoever is the best out of these three should get the shot at the champ. Same shit happened to UT a few years ago with the we beat Ok and lost to TT. Sucks but that is the way the system is set up.[/quote]
i think bama and lsu are the 2 best teams in the county, but i can not argue with this logic.
[quote]heavythrower wrote:
[quote]Derek542 wrote:
[quote]JoeGood wrote:
[quote]BamaGuy wrote:
[quote]Derek542 wrote:
[quote]BamaGuy wrote:
I am going to be dishing up some serious crow for a couple of posters when Bama gets in the NC game. [/quote]
Do you have a list[/quote]
Funny you should ask . . . [/quote]
Why?
Dude I’m a Bama Alum and I’d love to see Bama in the NC game but you have to admit theres compelling reasons for both putting them in as well as keeping them out.
[/quote]
Cant argue with a pirate, just not possible.
For the record I would not want to see the rematch.
Why?
Well cause it is supposed to be set up in my eyes as the best of the best from different conferences. Bama had its chance to win its division and they lost.
So Big 12, Pac 10, or Big 10 whoever is the best out of these three should get the shot at the champ. Same shit happened to UT a few years ago with the we beat Ok and lost to TT. Sucks but that is the way the system is set up.[/quote]
i think bama and lsu are the 2 best teams in the county, but i can not argue with this logic.
[/quote]
Thats the thing Heavy I think without any doubt they both are. BUT this is also about money that people refuse to acknowledge. No way IMO they put Bama and LSU due to the money angle, I really hope I am wrong cause then it would prove the BCS is not “fixed” just have to wait and see Sunday night.
Ya, I am getting you Derek. I am an Auburn alum, but I like Bama whenever they are not playing Auburn, despite that, they had their shot and missed. let somebody else take a crack at LSU.
Also, if Bama was to play another conference champ and LSU the same, I predict they both put a serious ass-whooping on whoever they get, and THAT would shut up a lot of the SEC haters out there.