College Football 2011 2.0

[quote]JoeGood wrote:

[quote]Derek542 wrote:

[quote]JoeGood wrote:

[quote]BamaGuy wrote:

[quote]Derek542 wrote:

[quote]BamaGuy wrote:
I am going to be dishing up some serious crow for a couple of posters when Bama gets in the NC game. [/quote]

Do you have a list[/quote]

Funny you should ask . . . [/quote]

Why?

Dude I’m a Bama Alum and I’d love to see Bama in the NC game but you have to admit theres compelling reasons for both putting them in as well as keeping them out.

[/quote]

Cant argue with a pirate, just not possible.

For the record I would not want to see the rematch.

Why?

Well cause it is supposed to be set up in my eyes as the best of the best from different conferences. Bama had its chance to win its division and they lost.

So Big 12, Pac 10, or Big 10 whoever is the best out of these three should get the shot at the champ. Same shit happened to UT a few years ago with the we beat Ok and lost to TT. Sucks but that is the way the system is set up.[/quote]

See I totally understand that. Now to me its supposed to put the two best teams against each other and nothing else matters but like I said I can understand your point. [/quote]

Its probably Joe that I am a NFL fan first and college second. So I like the conference championship concept. Without a playoff system there is no true way to say its the best two teams. Fucking beauty contest.

[quote]Derek542 wrote:

[quote]JoeGood wrote:

[quote]Derek542 wrote:

[quote]JoeGood wrote:

[quote]BamaGuy wrote:

[quote]Derek542 wrote:

[quote]BamaGuy wrote:
I am going to be dishing up some serious crow for a couple of posters when Bama gets in the NC game. [/quote]

Do you have a list[/quote]

Funny you should ask . . . [/quote]

Why?

Dude I’m a Bama Alum and I’d love to see Bama in the NC game but you have to admit theres compelling reasons for both putting them in as well as keeping them out.

[/quote]

Cant argue with a pirate, just not possible.

For the record I would not want to see the rematch.

Why?

Well cause it is supposed to be set up in my eyes as the best of the best from different conferences. Bama had its chance to win its division and they lost.

So Big 12, Pac 10, or Big 10 whoever is the best out of these three should get the shot at the champ. Same shit happened to UT a few years ago with the we beat Ok and lost to TT. Sucks but that is the way the system is set up.[/quote]

See I totally understand that. Now to me its supposed to put the two best teams against each other and nothing else matters but like I said I can understand your point. [/quote]

Its probably Joe that I am a NFL fan first and college second. So I like the conference championship concept. Without a playoff system there is no true way to say its the best two teams. Fucking beauty contest. [/quote]

My own personal belief is that the top four teams should play 1 vs. 4 and 2 vs. 3 with a plus one game of the NC.

[quote]JoeGood wrote:

[quote]Derek542 wrote:
Without a playoff system there is no true way to say its the best two teams. Fucking beauty contest. [/quote]

My own personal belief is that the top four teams should play 1 vs. 4 and 2 vs. 3 with a plus one game of the NC.[/quote]

+1
Dammit, they gotta do somethin!

I would personally like to see a 6-team playoff. If anyone cares, I can make my pitch and discuss details when there is more of a lull (after the CCG’s this week while we wait for bowls, maybe). From other message boards I have seen, playoff discussion for college football can draw some serious arguments and speculation, so that might be fun.

I also think Mike Leach to Wazzoo is a hell of a great hire for them.

[quote]Derek542 wrote:

[quote]BamaGuy wrote:

[quote]JoeGood wrote:

[quote]BamaGuy wrote:

[quote]Derek542 wrote:

[quote]BamaGuy wrote:
I am going to be dishing up some serious crow for a couple of posters when Bama gets in the NC game. [/quote]

Do you have a list[/quote]

Funny you should ask . . . [/quote]

Why?

Dude I’m a Bama Alum and I’d love to see Bama in the NC game but you have to admit theres compelling reasons for both putting them in as well as keeping them out.

[/quote]

Just check back several pages and see where I asked for some feedback on the possibility of Bama reaching the NC game after the loss to LSU. It had nothing to do with whether or not I wanted it to happen, which I did, but I just asked for some thoughts on the possibililty. A certain UT fan, still smarting from the whipping 2 years ago, came at me with both barrells and called me everything but a child of God for putting forth such a ridiculous scenario. It just makes it sweeter that it looks like it will in fact work out now when you have someone who said it couldn’t and wouldn’t happen.

Here is a look back at the SI preseason poll. Interesting to see the hits and misses on here:

[/quote]

Dude I was fucking with you? Are you still butt hurt about that?

If you had spent anytime on this site you would have known that.

I have stated many, many times on here that I am a football fan, I am a UT fan cause my little sister was a gymnast for UT. I actually graduated from an A&M affiliate.

I enjoy the game I watch all the games, I am not a rabid blind fan that gets emotionally involved. That was why I was fucking with you and I thought you figured that out.

Guess I was wrong. Oh well.[/quote]

Hey, take your crow and eat it like a man . . . or not. Don’t go balistic on me again like a little girl though. Grow a pair and say you were wrong or just keep saying you didn’t mean it. LOL! Speaking of butt hurt, after two years, really now, let it go!

Roll Tide Roll!

[quote]JoeGood wrote:

[quote]Derek542 wrote:

[quote]JoeGood wrote:

[quote]Derek542 wrote:

[quote]JoeGood wrote:

[quote]BamaGuy wrote:

[quote]Derek542 wrote:

[quote]BamaGuy wrote:
I am going to be dishing up some serious crow for a couple of posters when Bama gets in the NC game. [/quote]

Do you have a list[/quote]

Funny you should ask . . . [/quote]

Why?

Dude I’m a Bama Alum and I’d love to see Bama in the NC game but you have to admit theres compelling reasons for both putting them in as well as keeping them out.

[/quote]

Cant argue with a pirate, just not possible.

For the record I would not want to see the rematch.

Why?

Well cause it is supposed to be set up in my eyes as the best of the best from different conferences. Bama had its chance to win its division and they lost.

So Big 12, Pac 10, or Big 10 whoever is the best out of these three should get the shot at the champ. Same shit happened to UT a few years ago with the we beat Ok and lost to TT. Sucks but that is the way the system is set up.[/quote]

See I totally understand that. Now to me its supposed to put the two best teams against each other and nothing else matters but like I said I can understand your point. [/quote]

Its probably Joe that I am a NFL fan first and college second. So I like the conference championship concept. Without a playoff system there is no true way to say its the best two teams. Fucking beauty contest. [/quote]

My own personal belief is that the top four teams should play 1 vs. 4 and 2 vs. 3 with a plus one game of the NC.[/quote]

And then there are arguments about who the Top 4 are…

It blows my mind that the NCAA measure the winner of arguably the biggest sports league in the world with the subjectiveness of a figure skating contest.

I don’t hear anyone calling for a rubber match between the '07 Pats and Giants (they both beat each other that year).

Line shit up. Win your shit, you move on to bigger shit. Win the bigger shit, go to the Shit Show. Seems pretty simple to me. :slight_smile:

EDIT: PS: The NCAA does this every March with the other high profile sport.

[quote]BamaGuy wrote:

[quote]Derek542 wrote:

[quote]BamaGuy wrote:

[quote]JoeGood wrote:

[quote]BamaGuy wrote:

[quote]Derek542 wrote:

[quote]BamaGuy wrote:
I am going to be dishing up some serious crow for a couple of posters when Bama gets in the NC game. [/quote]

Do you have a list[/quote]

Funny you should ask . . . [/quote]

Why?

Dude I’m a Bama Alum and I’d love to see Bama in the NC game but you have to admit theres compelling reasons for both putting them in as well as keeping them out.

[/quote]

Just check back several pages and see where I asked for some feedback on the possibility of Bama reaching the NC game after the loss to LSU. It had nothing to do with whether or not I wanted it to happen, which I did, but I just asked for some thoughts on the possibililty. A certain UT fan, still smarting from the whipping 2 years ago, came at me with both barrells and called me everything but a child of God for putting forth such a ridiculous scenario. It just makes it sweeter that it looks like it will in fact work out now when you have someone who said it couldn’t and wouldn’t happen.

Here is a look back at the SI preseason poll. Interesting to see the hits and misses on here:

[/quote]

Dude I was fucking with you? Are you still butt hurt about that?

If you had spent anytime on this site you would have known that.

I have stated many, many times on here that I am a football fan, I am a UT fan cause my little sister was a gymnast for UT. I actually graduated from an A&M affiliate.

I enjoy the game I watch all the games, I am not a rabid blind fan that gets emotionally involved. That was why I was fucking with you and I thought you figured that out.

Guess I was wrong. Oh well.[/quote]

Hey, take your crow and eat it like a man . . . or not. Don’t go balistic on me again like a little girl though. Grow a pair and say you were wrong or just keep saying you didn’t mean it. LOL! Speaking of butt hurt, after two years, really now, let it go!

Roll Tide Roll!

[/quote]

WTF are you talking about, how old are you?

In case you have not figured out the rest of us have moved on. Again I was Fucking with you I do not get emotional I have kids to raise and a business to run. I’m sorry you cannot be mature enough to just move on.

Have you noticed how the rest of us adult males can Fuck with each other and not get butthurt?

Are you incapable of seeing this?

[quote]ddot76 wrote:

[quote]JoeGood wrote:

[quote]Derek542 wrote:

[quote]JoeGood wrote:

[quote]Derek542 wrote:

[quote]JoeGood wrote:

[quote]BamaGuy wrote:

[quote]Derek542 wrote:

[quote]BamaGuy wrote:
I am going to be dishing up some serious crow for a couple of posters when Bama gets in the NC game. [/quote]

Do you have a list[/quote]

Funny you should ask . . . [/quote]

Why?

Dude I’m a Bama Alum and I’d love to see Bama in the NC game but you have to admit theres compelling reasons for both putting them in as well as keeping them out.

[/quote]

Cant argue with a pirate, just not possible.

For the record I would not want to see the rematch.

Why?

Well cause it is supposed to be set up in my eyes as the best of the best from different conferences. Bama had its chance to win its division and they lost.

So Big 12, Pac 10, or Big 10 whoever is the best out of these three should get the shot at the champ. Same shit happened to UT a few years ago with the we beat Ok and lost to TT. Sucks but that is the way the system is set up.[/quote]

See I totally understand that. Now to me its supposed to put the two best teams against each other and nothing else matters but like I said I can understand your point. [/quote]

Its probably Joe that I am a NFL fan first and college second. So I like the conference championship concept. Without a playoff system there is no true way to say its the best two teams. Fucking beauty contest. [/quote]

My own personal belief is that the top four teams should play 1 vs. 4 and 2 vs. 3 with a plus one game of the NC.[/quote]

And then there are arguments about who the Top 4 are…

It blows my mind that the NCAA measure the winner of arguably the biggest sports league in the world with the subjectiveness of a figure skating contest.

I don’t hear anyone calling for a rubber match between the '07 Pats and Giants (they both beat each other that year).

Line shit up. Win your shit, you move on to bigger shit. Win the bigger shit, go to the Shit Show. Seems pretty simple to me. :slight_smile:

EDIT: PS: The NCAA does this every March with the other high profile sport.[/quote]

Let’s not forget the 64 teams that play so 8 can go to Omaha. Wasn’t that long ago that Fresno State won the MNC.

I have a solution to the BCS dilema. Since TCU and Bama are my 2 favorites, and noone wants a Bama rematch, TCU plays LSU for the MNC. I bet $100 on the team in purple.

[quote]DJHT wrote:

[quote]BamaGuy wrote:

[quote]Derek542 wrote:

[quote]BamaGuy wrote:

[quote]JoeGood wrote:

[quote]BamaGuy wrote:

[quote]Derek542 wrote:

[quote]BamaGuy wrote:
I am going to be dishing up some serious crow for a couple of posters when Bama gets in the NC game. [/quote]

Do you have a list[/quote]

Funny you should ask . . . [/quote]

Why?

Dude I’m a Bama Alum and I’d love to see Bama in the NC game but you have to admit theres compelling reasons for both putting them in as well as keeping them out.

[/quote]

Just check back several pages and see where I asked for some feedback on the possibility of Bama reaching the NC game after the loss to LSU. It had nothing to do with whether or not I wanted it to happen, which I did, but I just asked for some thoughts on the possibililty. A certain UT fan, still smarting from the whipping 2 years ago, came at me with both barrells and called me everything but a child of God for putting forth such a ridiculous scenario. It just makes it sweeter that it looks like it will in fact work out now when you have someone who said it couldn’t and wouldn’t happen.

Here is a look back at the SI preseason poll. Interesting to see the hits and misses on here:

[/quote]

Dude I was fucking with you? Are you still butt hurt about that?

If you had spent anytime on this site you would have known that.

I have stated many, many times on here that I am a football fan, I am a UT fan cause my little sister was a gymnast for UT. I actually graduated from an A&M affiliate.

I enjoy the game I watch all the games, I am not a rabid blind fan that gets emotionally involved. That was why I was fucking with you and I thought you figured that out.

Guess I was wrong. Oh well.[/quote]

Hey, take your crow and eat it like a man . . . or not. Don’t go balistic on me again like a little girl though. Grow a pair and say you were wrong or just keep saying you didn’t mean it. LOL! Speaking of butt hurt, after two years, really now, let it go!

Roll Tide Roll!

[/quote]

WTF are you talking about, how old are you?

In case you have not figured out the rest of us have moved on. Again I was Fucking with you I do not get emotional I have kids to raise and a business to run. I’m sorry you cannot be mature enough to just move on.

Have you noticed how the rest of us adult males can Fuck with each other and not get butthurt?

Are you incapable of seeing this?
[/quote]

Wow, defensive much? Your butt is REALLY sore huh? I mention eating some crow and you start coming unglued, again!
Calm down Opie, it’s just a forum. Just trash talking football and you threw some trash down that blew back on you. It happens. Comes with being a fan. If you can’t take it, don’t dish it out. Capice?

only way a rematch will not be played is if OKstate absolutely buries Oklahoma in saturday, who else than Bama or OKstate could challenge LSU???

[quote]BamaGuy wrote:

[quote]DJHT wrote:

[quote]BamaGuy wrote:

[quote]Derek542 wrote:

[quote]BamaGuy wrote:

[quote]JoeGood wrote:

[quote]BamaGuy wrote:

[quote]Derek542 wrote:

[quote]BamaGuy wrote:
I am going to be dishing up some serious crow for a couple of posters when Bama gets in the NC game. [/quote]

Do you have a list[/quote]

Funny you should ask . . . [/quote]

Why?

Dude I’m a Bama Alum and I’d love to see Bama in the NC game but you have to admit theres compelling reasons for both putting them in as well as keeping them out.

[/quote]

Just check back several pages and see where I asked for some feedback on the possibility of Bama reaching the NC game after the loss to LSU. It had nothing to do with whether or not I wanted it to happen, which I did, but I just asked for some thoughts on the possibililty. A certain UT fan, still smarting from the whipping 2 years ago, came at me with both barrells and called me everything but a child of God for putting forth such a ridiculous scenario. It just makes it sweeter that it looks like it will in fact work out now when you have someone who said it couldn’t and wouldn’t happen.

Here is a look back at the SI preseason poll. Interesting to see the hits and misses on here:

[/quote]

Dude I was fucking with you? Are you still butt hurt about that?

If you had spent anytime on this site you would have known that.

I have stated many, many times on here that I am a football fan, I am a UT fan cause my little sister was a gymnast for UT. I actually graduated from an A&M affiliate.

I enjoy the game I watch all the games, I am not a rabid blind fan that gets emotionally involved. That was why I was fucking with you and I thought you figured that out.

Guess I was wrong. Oh well.[/quote]

Hey, take your crow and eat it like a man . . . or not. Don’t go balistic on me again like a little girl though. Grow a pair and say you were wrong or just keep saying you didn’t mean it. LOL! Speaking of butt hurt, after two years, really now, let it go!

Roll Tide Roll!

[/quote]

WTF are you talking about, how old are you?

In case you have not figured out the rest of us have moved on. Again I was Fucking with you I do not get emotional I have kids to raise and a business to run. I’m sorry you cannot be mature enough to just move on.

Have you noticed how the rest of us adult males can Fuck with each other and not get butthurt?

Are you incapable of seeing this?
[/quote]

Wow, defensive much? Your butt is REALLY sore huh? I mention eating some crow and you start coming unglued, again!
Calm down Opie, it’s just a forum. Just trash talking football and you threw some trash down that blew back on you. It happens. Comes with being a fan. If you can’t take it, don’t dish it out. Capice?
[/quote]

You know had a long post trying to explain things to you, however you will never be able to see that you are being laughed at by everyone on here. You are not worth trying to make understand things.

Since you are obviously a RABID fan for Bama and its obvious you have never played the game and your whole emotional make up is wrapped into 18-20 year old kids playing football I will just put you on ignore.

You have not contributed anything to these boards EVER, you probably do not even lift. You Google college Football blogs, and jump on to thump your chest about your team. I know this cause nobody on here knows you, nobody on here even has had discussions with you. This is the third year we have had this thread and your post count shows what you contribute.

So with that said good luck sir, God bless. Dont worry about responding cause I will now put you on ignore and will not be able to see it.

DJ

[quote]hatesmiles wrote:
only way a rematch will not be played is if OKstate absolutely buries Oklahoma in saturday, who else than Bama or OKstate could challenge LSU???[/quote]

Unfortunately College football is not set up this way, its a beauty contest.

Why not Stanford? V Tech?

There are numerous 1 loss teams and some how through Magic the media will put in who will be the biggest money maker.

You really think from a national money market region standpoint that they want to see Bama and LSU play?

No matter what we think from a football perspective Bama vs LSU = very little money

LSU vs West coast, Central or Northern team = bigger money.

[quote]ddot76 wrote:

[quote]JoeGood wrote:

[quote]Derek542 wrote:

[quote]JoeGood wrote:

[quote]Derek542 wrote:

[quote]JoeGood wrote:

[quote]BamaGuy wrote:

[quote]Derek542 wrote:

[quote]BamaGuy wrote:
I am going to be dishing up some serious crow for a couple of posters when Bama gets in the NC game. [/quote]

Do you have a list[/quote]

Funny you should ask . . . [/quote]

Why?

Dude I’m a Bama Alum and I’d love to see Bama in the NC game but you have to admit theres compelling reasons for both putting them in as well as keeping them out.

[/quote]

Cant argue with a pirate, just not possible.

For the record I would not want to see the rematch.

Why?

Well cause it is supposed to be set up in my eyes as the best of the best from different conferences. Bama had its chance to win its division and they lost.

So Big 12, Pac 10, or Big 10 whoever is the best out of these three should get the shot at the champ. Same shit happened to UT a few years ago with the we beat Ok and lost to TT. Sucks but that is the way the system is set up.[/quote]

See I totally understand that. Now to me its supposed to put the two best teams against each other and nothing else matters but like I said I can understand your point. [/quote]

Its probably Joe that I am a NFL fan first and college second. So I like the conference championship concept. Without a playoff system there is no true way to say its the best two teams. Fucking beauty contest. [/quote]

My own personal belief is that the top four teams should play 1 vs. 4 and 2 vs. 3 with a plus one game of the NC.[/quote]

And then there are arguments about who the Top 4 are…

It blows my mind that the NCAA measure the winner of arguably the biggest sports league in the world with the subjectiveness of a figure skating contest.

I don’t hear anyone calling for a rubber match between the '07 Pats and Giants (they both beat each other that year).

Line shit up. Win your shit, you move on to bigger shit. Win the bigger shit, go to the Shit Show. Seems pretty simple to me. :slight_smile:

EDIT: PS: The NCAA does this every March with the other high profile sport.[/quote]

Well yeah but you mention the March tournaments and every year they have debates about who got in and who left out. You have to pick a point somewhere and given the nature of college football we are not going to get a 16 team play off so a plus one game would at least address a lot of the issues now.

[quote]JoeGood wrote:

[quote]ddot76 wrote:

[quote]JoeGood wrote:

[quote]Derek542 wrote:

[quote]JoeGood wrote:

[quote]Derek542 wrote:

[quote]JoeGood wrote:

[quote]BamaGuy wrote:

[quote]Derek542 wrote:

[quote]BamaGuy wrote:
I am going to be dishing up some serious crow for a couple of posters when Bama gets in the NC game. [/quote]

Do you have a list[/quote]

Funny you should ask . . . [/quote]

Why?

Dude I’m a Bama Alum and I’d love to see Bama in the NC game but you have to admit theres compelling reasons for both putting them in as well as keeping them out.

[/quote]

Cant argue with a pirate, just not possible.

For the record I would not want to see the rematch.

Why?

Well cause it is supposed to be set up in my eyes as the best of the best from different conferences. Bama had its chance to win its division and they lost.

So Big 12, Pac 10, or Big 10 whoever is the best out of these three should get the shot at the champ. Same shit happened to UT a few years ago with the we beat Ok and lost to TT. Sucks but that is the way the system is set up.[/quote]

See I totally understand that. Now to me its supposed to put the two best teams against each other and nothing else matters but like I said I can understand your point. [/quote]

Its probably Joe that I am a NFL fan first and college second. So I like the conference championship concept. Without a playoff system there is no true way to say its the best two teams. Fucking beauty contest. [/quote]

My own personal belief is that the top four teams should play 1 vs. 4 and 2 vs. 3 with a plus one game of the NC.[/quote]

And then there are arguments about who the Top 4 are…

It blows my mind that the NCAA measure the winner of arguably the biggest sports league in the world with the subjectiveness of a figure skating contest.

I don’t hear anyone calling for a rubber match between the '07 Pats and Giants (they both beat each other that year).

Line shit up. Win your shit, you move on to bigger shit. Win the bigger shit, go to the Shit Show. Seems pretty simple to me. :slight_smile:

EDIT: PS: The NCAA does this every March with the other high profile sport.[/quote]

Well yeah but you mention the March tournaments and every year they have debates about who got in and who left out. You have to pick a point somewhere and given the nature of college football we are not going to get a 16 team play off so a plus one game would at least address a lot of the issues now.[/quote]

Plus, big difference between playing multiple basketball games a week, and trying to play multiple football games a week.

Anyone’s opinion changing one way or the other on the BCS Title game? The more I think about it the more I think Alabama should get in…I think Rick Reilly makes some good points below:

"Man, these SEC fans are good. The hate email came in before the column was even finished.

Hey Reilly:

I hope you get gangrene on your nose. Your so-called “article” ridiculing an LSU-Alabama rematch for the national championship was stupid. Just because you thought the first one was “boring” does not mean these are not the two best teams. Go back to your spider hole.

–Jimmy Tomjack, Birmingham, Ala.

The first LSU-Alabama game was more boring than Tim Tebow’s porn stash. To play another one will be like remaking “J. Edgar” or attending a goiter convention.

But that’s not why there should be no Dullapalooza II on Jan. 9 in the Superdome. There shouldn’t be one because it makes the BCS honchos liars. This is their Twitter handle: @EveryGameCounts. But how can every game count if it doesn’t matter who won the first one?

If you remember, LSU won the first game – which resembled hippos taking a mud bath – 9-6 (in OT, no less), in Tuscaloosa. Didn’t hurt the Tide any. They’re going to get a mulligan if we don’t stop it. You have to figure, too, that, if Alabama had won, then LSU would only have one loss and the Tigers would get the redo. This is because, apparently, no conference can really play football in this country except the SEC, which invented the sport in 2006.

Meanwhile, four one-loss teams that didn’t get two shots at the title will be playing in the Black Friday Pepper Spray Bowl. Afterward, they’ll tweet about it at @EveryGameCountsUnlessAnSECTeamLoses.

A team that didn’t even make its conference title game will be playing in the national title game? It’s like Rick Perry withdrawing from the primaries and then going up against President Barack Obama.
Dear Communist:

You have the brains of half a worm. It’s true that Alabama didn’t qualify for their own conference title game, but they’re still the second-best team in the country by a country mile. Go drink a can of Raid.

–Jacktom Jimmy, Tuscaloosa, Ala.

Sorry. Alabama playing in the title game is bonkers. A team that didn’t even make its conference title game will be playing in the national title game? It’s like Rick Perry withdrawing from the primaries and then going up against President Obama.

But imagine how idiotic this system is through LSU’s binoculars. While the Bayou Bengals are beating their brains out against Georgia in the conference title game this Saturday at the Georgia Dome – aka, the crime scene – Alabama will be enjoying chicken wings and “Tosh.0” reruns and resting up.

“I won’t lie to you,” Alabama linebacker Dont’a Hightower told The Associated Press. “It’s going to be good to get a week off. A lot of guys are banged up.”

Welcome to BCS logic.

Of course, if Alabama wins Walking Dead II, the Tide will be ? what? National champions? How? They’ll have one loss, same as all the other contenders. They’ll have split the home-and-home series with LSU. They won’t even have won their SEC division, much less their conference. Yet they could wind up petting the crystal football.

Wouldn’t that be special?

Yo, jackwagon:

You rail against a rematch, but who would you rather have play LSU? There’s nobody else. Even No. 3 Oklahoma State coach Mike Gundy said this week that he wouldn’t vote his team No. 2. Go pound tumbleweeds.

–Tommy Jim, Jackson, Ala.

Whom would I rather see? Any team that hasn’t already blown its chance.

Because of a flawed BCS system, we may never know if Kellen Moore and Boise State could hang with LSU. LSU vs. Oklahoma State (if the Cowboys beat Oklahoma on Saturday) would be tasty. And Gundy did say he’d consider his team for No. 2 if it beat OU.

Just to introduce you to OSU. An offense that scores approximately every 11.3 seconds. A strength of schedule ranked 10th, compared with Alabama’s at 38th. A team whose only loss was in double overtime to Iowa State the same week an OSU school plane crashed, killing two women’s basketball coaches. A school that beat five teams with winning records to Alabama’s three. A team with four wins over BCS top 25 teams to Alabama’s two. Hello?

Or what about Stanford-LSU? Like the Houndstooths, the Cardinal only have one loss, theirs to an Oregon team faster than 4G. You don’t think a Stanford team led by Heisman Trophy shoo-in QB Andrew Luck wouldn’t make any SEC defense wonder whether to scream or go bowling?

What about LSU-Virginia Tech? The Hokies’ only loss was to Clemson, which they could avenge Saturday in the ACC title game.

Or LSU vs. one-loss Boise State? The Broncos fell to TCU by just one point. You SEC fans remember Boise State, right? It went down south in Week 1 and beat Georgia? Georgia, the team that’s one win from claiming your most holy and exalted SEC title?

With all these deserving teams, you still think Alabama should get another chance? You want Kris Humphries and Kim Kardashian to remarry, too?

This SEC bias has to stop. The world of college football doesn’t end at the Louisiana border.

The Rematch should make you want to Regurgitate. Two-thirds of the rankings are based on humans. Voters, be fair. We played this one already, and Alabama lost.

What, your TiVo broke?"

[quote]educote wrote:
Anyone’s opinion changing one way or the other on the BCS Title game? The more I think about it the more I think Alabama should get in…I think Rick Reilly makes some good points below:

"Man, these SEC fans are good. The hate email came in before the column was even finished.

Hey Reilly:

I hope you get gangrene on your nose. Your so-called “article” ridiculing an LSU-Alabama rematch for the national championship was stupid. Just because you thought the first one was “boring” does not mean these are not the two best teams. Go back to your spider hole.

–Jimmy Tomjack, Birmingham, Ala.

The first LSU-Alabama game was more boring than Tim Tebow’s porn stash. To play another one will be like remaking “J. Edgar” or attending a goiter convention.

But that’s not why there should be no Dullapalooza II on Jan. 9 in the Superdome. There shouldn’t be one because it makes the BCS honchos liars. This is their Twitter handle: @EveryGameCounts. But how can every game count if it doesn’t matter who won the first one?

If you remember, LSU won the first game – which resembled hippos taking a mud bath – 9-6 (in OT, no less), in Tuscaloosa. Didn’t hurt the Tide any. They’re going to get a mulligan if we don’t stop it. You have to figure, too, that, if Alabama had won, then LSU would only have one loss and the Tigers would get the redo. This is because, apparently, no conference can really play football in this country except the SEC, which invented the sport in 2006.

Meanwhile, four one-loss teams that didn’t get two shots at the title will be playing in the Black Friday Pepper Spray Bowl. Afterward, they’ll tweet about it at @EveryGameCountsUnlessAnSECTeamLoses.

A team that didn’t even make its conference title game will be playing in the national title game? It’s like Rick Perry withdrawing from the primaries and then going up against President Barack Obama.
Dear Communist:

You have the brains of half a worm. It’s true that Alabama didn’t qualify for their own conference title game, but they’re still the second-best team in the country by a country mile. Go drink a can of Raid.

–Jacktom Jimmy, Tuscaloosa, Ala.

Sorry. Alabama playing in the title game is bonkers. A team that didn’t even make its conference title game will be playing in the national title game? It’s like Rick Perry withdrawing from the primaries and then going up against President Obama.

But imagine how idiotic this system is through LSU’s binoculars. While the Bayou Bengals are beating their brains out against Georgia in the conference title game this Saturday at the Georgia Dome – aka, the crime scene – Alabama will be enjoying chicken wings and “Tosh.0” reruns and resting up.

“I won’t lie to you,” Alabama linebacker Dont’a Hightower told The Associated Press. “It’s going to be good to get a week off. A lot of guys are banged up.”

Welcome to BCS logic.

Of course, if Alabama wins Walking Dead II, the Tide will be ? what? National champions? How? They’ll have one loss, same as all the other contenders. They’ll have split the home-and-home series with LSU. They won’t even have won their SEC division, much less their conference. Yet they could wind up petting the crystal football.

Wouldn’t that be special?

Yo, jackwagon:

You rail against a rematch, but who would you rather have play LSU? There’s nobody else. Even No. 3 Oklahoma State coach Mike Gundy said this week that he wouldn’t vote his team No. 2. Go pound tumbleweeds.

–Tommy Jim, Jackson, Ala.

Whom would I rather see? Any team that hasn’t already blown its chance.

Because of a flawed BCS system, we may never know if Kellen Moore and Boise State could hang with LSU. LSU vs. Oklahoma State (if the Cowboys beat Oklahoma on Saturday) would be tasty. And Gundy did say he’d consider his team for No. 2 if it beat OU.

Just to introduce you to OSU. An offense that scores approximately every 11.3 seconds. A strength of schedule ranked 10th, compared with Alabama’s at 38th. A team whose only loss was in double overtime to Iowa State the same week an OSU school plane crashed, killing two women’s basketball coaches. A school that beat five teams with winning records to Alabama’s three. A team with four wins over BCS top 25 teams to Alabama’s two. Hello?

Or what about Stanford-LSU? Like the Houndstooths, the Cardinal only have one loss, theirs to an Oregon team faster than 4G. You don’t think a Stanford team led by Heisman Trophy shoo-in QB Andrew Luck wouldn’t make any SEC defense wonder whether to scream or go bowling?

What about LSU-Virginia Tech? The Hokies’ only loss was to Clemson, which they could avenge Saturday in the ACC title game.

Or LSU vs. one-loss Boise State? The Broncos fell to TCU by just one point. You SEC fans remember Boise State, right? It went down south in Week 1 and beat Georgia? Georgia, the team that’s one win from claiming your most holy and exalted SEC title?

With all these deserving teams, you still think Alabama should get another chance? You want Kris Humphries and Kim Kardashian to remarry, too?

This SEC bias has to stop. The world of college football doesn’t end at the Louisiana border.

The Rematch should make you want to Regurgitate. Two-thirds of the rankings are based on humans. Voters, be fair. We played this one already, and Alabama lost.

What, your TiVo broke?"

[/quote]

I think the two top teams in all of college should play it every year. This year that’s 'bama LSU, period. If it turns out that way then I am satisfied. The problem with the BCS setup is that the two top teams don’t always get in. One top team and the other a close second which turns in to a route which is boring. I am not a fan of either team, but I recognize that they are the best. They just fucking destroy everybody, except each other.

I’m not at all excited for a rematch for the NCG, but I have a hard time thinking that LSU and Bama are not the two best teams. I would prefer a playoff, or I would prefer LSU to play someone else in this system, but as it is, Bama is a legitimate #2.

In the first game, it was not exactly clear cut that LSU was the better team overall (except for field goal kicking, of course).

The Reilly article was entertaining, but it’s asinine to make this comment:

and then follow it up with this suggestion:[quote]Or what about Stanford-LSU? Like the Houndstooths, the Cardinal only have one loss, theirs to an Oregon team faster than 4G. [/quote]
Stanford is sitting at home tonight watching their conference championship game…

[quote]Derek542 wrote:

[quote]BamaGuy wrote:

[quote]JoeGood wrote:

[quote]BamaGuy wrote:

[quote]Derek542 wrote:

[quote]BamaGuy wrote:
I am going to be dishing up some serious crow for a couple of posters when Bama gets in the NC game. [/quote]

Do you have a list[/quote]

Funny you should ask . . . [/quote]

Why?

Dude I’m a Bama Alum and I’d love to see Bama in the NC game but you have to admit theres compelling reasons for both putting them in as well as keeping them out.

[/quote]

Just check back several pages and see where I asked for some feedback on the possibility of Bama reaching the NC game after the loss to LSU. It had nothing to do with whether or not I wanted it to happen, which I did, but I just asked for some thoughts on the possibililty. A certain UT fan, still smarting from the whipping 2 years ago, came at me with both barrells and called me everything but a child of God for putting forth such a ridiculous scenario. It just makes it sweeter that it looks like it will in fact work out now when you have someone who said it couldn’t and wouldn’t happen.

Here is a look back at the SI preseason poll. Interesting to see the hits and misses on here:

[/quote]

Dude I was fucking with you? Are you still butt hurt about that?

If you had spent anytime on this site you would have known that.

I have stated many, many times on here that I am a football fan, I am a UT fan cause my little sister was a gymnast for UT. I actually graduated from an A&M affiliate.

I enjoy the game I watch all the games, I am not a rabid blind fan that gets emotionally involved. That was why I was fucking with you and I thought you figured that out.

Guess I was wrong. Oh well.[/quote]

It begs the question, is your sister hot?

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]Derek542 wrote:

[quote]BamaGuy wrote:

[quote]JoeGood wrote:

[quote]BamaGuy wrote:

[quote]Derek542 wrote:

[quote]BamaGuy wrote:
I am going to be dishing up some serious crow for a couple of posters when Bama gets in the NC game. [/quote]

Do you have a list[/quote]

Funny you should ask . . . [/quote]

Why?

Dude I’m a Bama Alum and I’d love to see Bama in the NC game but you have to admit theres compelling reasons for both putting them in as well as keeping them out.

[/quote]

Just check back several pages and see where I asked for some feedback on the possibility of Bama reaching the NC game after the loss to LSU. It had nothing to do with whether or not I wanted it to happen, which I did, but I just asked for some thoughts on the possibililty. A certain UT fan, still smarting from the whipping 2 years ago, came at me with both barrells and called me everything but a child of God for putting forth such a ridiculous scenario. It just makes it sweeter that it looks like it will in fact work out now when you have someone who said it couldn’t and wouldn’t happen.

Here is a look back at the SI preseason poll. Interesting to see the hits and misses on here:

[/quote]

Dude I was fucking with you? Are you still butt hurt about that?

If you had spent anytime on this site you would have known that.

I have stated many, many times on here that I am a football fan, I am a UT fan cause my little sister was a gymnast for UT. I actually graduated from an A&M affiliate.

I enjoy the game I watch all the games, I am not a rabid blind fan that gets emotionally involved. That was why I was fucking with you and I thought you figured that out.

Guess I was wrong. Oh well.[/quote]

It begs the question, is your sister hot?[/quote]

Damn Hillbilly’s.

My brother-in-law thinks so.

Dixie has already been asking about her when he saw her picture.