Clinical Trial on Testosterone in Elderly Men

I saw this recently and thought people would be interested. Wall Street Journal article on a clinical trial for a company making a test gel-type product. Unfortunately, the trial was halted because the treatment group had 4x as many “cardiovascular events” as the control group. Article is pretty balanced anyway tho, and links to some relevant sites. It doesn’t seem clear exactly what constitutes a cardio event, but I found it odd/intriguing, since my previous understanding was that the only effects test would have on the heart (directly, not including putting you HDL in the crapper) would’ve been long-term LVH, but obviously none of these guys were on for that long. Anyhow, thought some would find this interesting

* June 30, 2010, 5:16 PM ET

Testosterone Trial Was Halted Over Cardiovascular Events

By Katherine Hobson

The benefits and harms of testosterone use in older men are being studied, but as yet arenâ??t well-established. Now, though, a study published online by the New England Journal of Medicine raises the question of whether hormone supplementation might be hazardous for a certain group of men.

The study, led by researchers at Boston University and conducted at three sites in that city, set out to find whether a daily daub of testosterone gel could safely improve mobility among men over age 65 with low levels of the hormone and who had trouble getting around. In healthy older men, testosterone supplementation has been shown to boost muscle mass and leg power, which can improve mobility.

But before researchers could finish enrolling its planned 252 participants, an analysis showed a significantly higher rate of cardiovascular problems in the group using the gel. Of the 106-man group taking testosterone, 23 experienced cardiovascular-related events (including heart attacks and atrial fibrillation) compared to 5 in the 103-man control group. The trial was stopped on Dec. 31.

Still, the finding isnâ??t definitive. â??These results are a caution flag, not a red light, about testosterone treatment,â?? Evan Hadley, director of the division of geriatrics and clinical gerontology at the National Institute on Aging, tells the Health Blog. Hadley isnâ??t an author of the study but helped oversee it. The NIA was the primary source of funding for the research.

There are a couple of reasons not to make sweeping conclusions about testosterone use on the basis of this study. First, the authors say, because they werenâ??t expecting cardiovascular events, they didnâ??t have a structure in place to systematically evaluate them. The trial was also small, and the same results wouldnâ??t necessarily show up in a larger study. The men enrolled in the study had a lot of other health problems, including obesity, diabetes and heart disease. And thereâ??s not a lot of existing research that shows testosteroneâ??s impact on heart problems in older men, one way or the other.

Itâ??s also possible that the spate of cardiovascular problems occurred due to chance alone, the authors write, particularly since there was a range of different heart-related issues. Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, which makes the testosterone gel used in the study, said in a statement that it will do its own â??in-depth safety analysisâ?? but that it doesnâ??t believe the product is unsafe. The company cited the limitations of the study and the authorsâ?? emphasis that the results could have occurred by chance.

Obviously this study wonâ??t be able to give further clues. But, says Hadley, other trials are going forward, albeit with more extensive screening for heart issues. One such trial is an 800-man study thatâ??s now enrolling participants and is also funded by the NIA. It will look at whether muscle mass, walking ability, vitality, sexual function, cognition, anemia and â?? ironically â?? cardiovascular disease can be improved by the use of testosterone.

Update: This post has been updated with reaction from Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, the maker of the testosterone used in the study.

Abstract of the study: http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1000485

News release: I think this is for the trial that was written about, but the article hyperlinked to it from the phrase “800-man study” so I’m not sure: http://www.nia.nih.gov/NewsAndEvents/PressReleases/PR20091102-Testosterone.htm

2008 article on the benefits of TRT: Grumpy Old Men: Maybe It's A Question of Testosterone - WSJ

hrmmmm I wonder if there is something we aren’t being told here. Was it a double blind study? If not, it could be possible the experiment group were literally worrying themselves into poor condition. Interesting though.

Well, a double blind would mean that BOTH the experiment facilitators and the experiment group are “blind” as to who receives the placebo and who is given the “real” stuff. A blind study means that only the control and the experiment groups are unaware of who is given the placebo while the facilitators know. Double-blinds eliminate faciliators bias.

I doubt 23 guys worried themselves into a heart attack. If anything, they probably had a heart attack getting laid after not doing the deed for awhile while the controls sat around, read the newspaper and ate at Country Kitchen. Just kidding old folks.

I agree with you that something seems really fishy about this case. Auxilium, if I’m not mistaken, makes Testim gel. I personally think that any future testosterone delivery systems were already going to be under severe scrutiny, and this event doesn’t help. One thing that sticks out to me are the parameters of the study and who was allowed to participate. Were any on PDE5 inhibitors or blood thinners etc.?

The FDA is already extremely stingy on which testosterone preparations can reach the market. See: Nebido/Aveed. This testosterone undecanoate preparation wasn’t allowed on the market in the U.S. for “rare but serious” events that occurred and Endo Pharmaceuticals apparent inability to properly document these events and their planned response on handling these adverse events. Note, however, that Nebido is approved in basically every country EXCEPT for the U.S.

Regardless, I think that many doctors were already so concerned with prostate cancer in terms of TRT and now the fact that they have to worry about their patients’ heart health just makes it worse. Dammit Auxilium…get your shiz together!

[quote]VTBalla34 wrote:
hrmmmm I wonder if there is something we aren’t being told here. Was it a double blind study? If not, it could be possible the experiment group were literally worrying themselves into poor condition. Interesting though.[/quote]

I know what a double blind study, and I see how my post would be construed that I didn’t, but the double blind would eliminate all possible biases from entering the test subjects, which as you know is the best way to conduct a study of this sort.

And the “complications” weren’t all heart attacks. I think it said a mixture of various cardio-respiratory side effects.

Not that I don’t personally believe the test is the likely contributor, just that we don’t need any more hosed studies making it to mainstream media indicating that “steroids are baad…mmmkay?”.

LEF.org just responded with:
“”"
Mainstream Doctorsâ?? Ineptitude Put on Display
in The New England Journal of Medicine

A study published in the June 30, 2010 edition of The New England Journal of Medicine confirms how little conventional doctors know about prescribing testosterone to aging men.

The Life Extension Foundation® (and its medical advisors) long ago recognized that maturing men have a propensity to convert (aromatize) testosterone into estrogen. When you see an overweight man growing breasts, it is not directly because he eats too much. This phenomenon is instead caused by the testosterone he converts to breast-enlarging estrogen.

When men are prescribed testosterone gels or creams, they sometimes have to take an aromatase-inhibiting drug (like Arimidex®) to prevent their estrogen (measured as estradiol in the blood) from climbing to dangerous levels.

Optimal estradiol blood levels in men are between 20-30 pg/mL. Elderly males can have much higher estradiol levels that place them at substantial risk for developing coronary atherosclerosis and thrombotic stroke.

If elderly men are prescribed large doses of topical testosterone gel or cream, their estradiol blood levels have to be tested and properly controlled. Failure to manage estradiol in men receiving high-dose testosterone gel or cream can result in a catastrophic estrogen surge that increases vascular disease risk and premature death.

Enormous tax dollars squandered on flawed testosterone study

The Federal government provided a financial grant to an armada of doctors to evaluate the effects of high-dose testosterone on men that were so severely debilitated that they struggled to climb more than 10 stairs or walk the equivalent of two city blocks.

These men suffered numerous risk factors such as obesity, diabetes, hypertension, and elevated blood lipids that placed them at higher risk for cardiovascular events. Obese men tend to produce loads of estrogen in their abdominal fat â?? and typically have higher estradiol levels than thinner men.

The men with the worst vascular risk factors (such as highest triglyceride levels) were placed on a dose of topical testosterone that is TWICE the standard starting dose. These debilitated men were given testosterone in a way that is more likely to aromatize through the skin into estrogen.

Men with fewer vascular risk factors were given a placebo gel.

It should be no surprise to learn that this study was halted prematurely because the debilitated men given the high-dose testosterone (with no aromatase inhibitor) suffered more â??atherosclerosis-related eventsâ?? such as heart attack, stroke, and sudden death.

The official title of this study is â??Adverse Events with Testosterone Administration.â?? A more accurate title may have been: “Elevated Estrogen Leads to Cardiovascular Events in Older Men.”

Click here to read Life Extension娉??s recent review about the dangers of estrogen imbalance in aging men, click here

Life Extension writes a letter to these doctors

The day this study was published, Life Extension wrote the doctors who conducted the study asking if there was any data regarding baseline and post-baseline blood estradiol levels. We have waited over four weeks, and the authors of The New England Journal of Medicine study have not responded to our repeated requests as to whether estradiol levels were ever measured.

From what was written in the paper, it does not appear that any attention was paid to the estrogen levels in these debilitated men. The authors wrote in the discussion section of the paper, â??Testosterone and associated increases in estradiol may promote inflammation, coagulation and platelet aggregation.â?? Yet these doctors donâ??t appear to have done anything to evaluate estradiol levels in the unfortunate study subjects given double-dose testosterone with no aromatase inhibitor to suppress the expected estrogen surge.

This study had numerous other flaws

Leaving aside the failure to manage estradiol levels in men given high-dose testosterone gel, there were numerous design flaws that call into question any conclusion that can be drawn from this study.

As mentioned earlier, the testosterone group at baseline was at greater risk for cardiovascular events as manifested by a greater proportion of men in the testosterone group with dyslipidemia who were undergoing statin and antihypertensive drug treatment.

In addition, triglyceride levels (higher) and HDL levels (lower) were trending against the testosterone group. Clearly, the baseline cardiovascular risk for the testosterone group was higher than the placebo group. The authors claim that a sensitivity analysis, as well as controlling for cardiovascular risk factors, did not change the results, but the small sample size and relatively short trial duration serve to magnify, not minimize, differences due to chance.

The study was not designed to systematically assess for cardiovascular events, and given the small sample size, lack of consistent pattern of events, diversity of serious events, and small number of serious adverse cardiac events (10 vs. 1) in the two treatment groups before study stoppage in this short duration trial strongly suggest that the results are due to chance. Another explanation of course is that the adverse vascular events were caused by the uncontrolled conversion of the topically-applied testosterone to estradiol in men who were already likely to have dangerously high estradiol blood levels to begin with.

Fodder for the media

The published scientific data documents low testosterone as being an independent risk factor for heart attack and a host of other age-related ailments.

The authors of this study acknowledge the benefits the testosterone group obtained from the drug and openly admitted the limitations of this study in providing guidance about the effects of testosterone on different population groups.

The media, however, has a propensity to publicize one negative study while ignoring hundreds of positive ones. We will not be surprised to see this horrifically flawed study used for decades to discredit the safety and efficacy of properly prescribed testosterone cream and aromatase-inhibition therapy.

Importance of blood testing in men supplementing with testosterone

In response to overwhelmingly favorable studies, record numbers of aging men are rubbing testosterone creams or gels on to their skin each day to restore this vital hormone to youthful levels.

Within 45-60 days of initiating testosterone replacement therapy, the following blood tests should be done to ensure safety and efficacy:

PSA (prostate specific antigen) â?? To rule out prostate cancer
Estradiol â?? To make sure testosterone is not converting to estrogen
Free & Total Testosterone â?? To make sure enough testosterone is being absorbed
CBC/Chemistry â?? To make sure liver enzymes are normal and red blood production has not increased too much
These tests can be done at your doctorâ??s office, or you can order them all directly from Life Extension by calling 1-877-354-6513 (24 hours a day) and asking for the Male Testosterone Panel (item LC100001). These tests can retail for over $500.00 at commercial labs, but Life Extension members pay only $125.00. Order your blood tests now!

To review Life Extension articles describing benefits of testosterone replacement in aging men, click here: Optimizing Testosterone Levels in Aging Men, Vindication.

Summary of 5 recent peer-reviewed studies noting adverse cardiovascular effects associated with elevated estrogen in aging men:

  1. After adjustment for age, hypertension, diabetes, adiposity, cholesterol, atrial fibrillation, and other characteristics were made in a group of 2,197 men aged 71 to 93 years of age, men with the highest blood levels of estradiol had a 2.2-fold greater risk of stroke compared with those whose estradiol levels were lower. {Reference: Abbott RD, Launer LJ, Rodriguez BL, et al. Serum estradiol and risk of stroke in elderly men. Neurology. 2007 Feb 20;68(8):563-8.}

  2. In a study of 313 men whose average age was 58, carotid artery intima-media thickness was measured at baseline and then three years later. After adjusting for other confounding risk factors, higher levels of estradiol were associated with thickening of the carotid artery wall. Researchers concluded, â??Circulating estradiol is a predictor of progression of carotid artery intima-media thickness in middle-aged men.â?? {Reference: Tivesten A, Hulthe J, Wallenfeldt K, et al. Circulating estradiol is an independent predictor of progression of carotid artery intima-media thickness in middle-aged men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006 Nov;91(11):4433-7.}

  3. In an angiographic trial of coronary atherosclerosis in a group of men with stable coronary artery disease, significant positive correlations between estradiol levels and other known atherosclerotic risk factors was observed. Researchers concluded, "Our results indicate a possible role of estradiol in promoting the development of atherogenic lipid milieu in men with coronary artery disease.â?? {Reference: Wranicz JK, Cygankiewicz I, Rosiak M, et al. The relationship between sex hormones and lipid profile in men with coronary artery disease. Int J Cardiol. 2005 May 11;101(1):105-10.}

  4. In another angiographic trial of coronary atherosclerosis in men aged 40-60 years, compared with healthy age-matched controls, men with coronary atherosclerosis had higher levels of estrone and a low level of testosterone in the presence of a high level of estradiol. Researchers concluded, "Low levels of total testosterone, testosterone/estradiol ratio and free androgen index and higher levels of estrone in men with coronary artery disease appear together with many features of metabolic syndrome and may be involved in the pathogenesis of coronary atherosclerosis.â?? {Reference: Dunajska K, Milewicz A, Szymczak J, et al. Evaluation of sex hormone levels and some metabolic factors in men with coronary atherosclerosis. Aging Male. 2004 Sep;7(3):197-204.}

  5. In a study of men having suffered an acute myocardial infarction (heart attack), a prior heart attack, and patients with normal coronary arteries, the results showed significantly higher levels of estradiol in both groups of heart attack patients compared with those without coronary disease. {Reference: Mohamad MJ, Mohammad MA, Karayyem M, Hairi A, Hader AA. Serum levels of sex hormones in men with acute myocardial infarction. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2007 Apr;28(2):182-6.}

“”"

Great find KSMan. I think it’s suspicious that a federally funded project resulted in such ineptness. Call me paranoid but I wonder if there’s a hidden agenda behind all this. I’m sure I’ve seen too many movies…

A plan to kill of old guys and lighten the load on medicare?
A plan to discredit TRT and reduce access to T?

I mean, the ladies over on thyroid boards have conspiracy theories…why can’t we??