doesnt matter - 
The judge plans on running it with my next cycle strictly to see if the lube qualitys can help soothe these shoulder probs a bit.
i plan on running test/deca this winterâŠprobably something like 500/300 along with some adex.
these things always seem to go in waves where everyone gets down on a drugâŠit wasnât so long ago that everyone was saying EQ is useless and that tren shutdown was too severe.
I think the key with every drug is realistic expectations and a good understanding of how they need to be run and countering side effects.
drugs also effect people differently (deca vs tren is a good example) where some people tolerate the sides well and others canâtâŠonly way to know is to try em yourself.
Ive also noticed lots of people opting for EQ rather than Deca. Of these two drugs, whatâs your preference and why?
[quote]Jazz_Man1898 wrote:
Ive also noticed lots of people opting for EQ rather than Deca. Of these two drugs, whatâs your preference and why?[/quote]
I know that the question wasnât directed at myself but I can give you my .02
Deca IMHO is better for bulking as it goes very well with test and I tolerate it very well. I also appreciate the joint lubrication and pain free workouts that also come along with it. Although it lacks in the strength department compared to the other Nor19 Tren, I donât have any issue with hunger while on deca, so I can consume massive amounts of calories at will.
EQ IMVHO is better used during a cutting cycle. Minimal bloat and for myself almost no risk of gyno from it. It does increase hunger at doses over 300mg/week however I can keep my diet under control so this is not an issue for me when cutting.
I must say that I can rationalize the use of EQ during bulking as a means to increase hunger but I still think deca will help build more muscle. When I have used EQ in cutting cycles I got very lean/vascular and overall just looked good.
Again my .02
For a bulking cycle I see no reason why someone couldnât use 300mg/w EQ and 300mg/w Deca along with their 500+mg/w of testâŠwhy not get the benifits of both?
in terms of cutting I had waaay too much trouble not eating everything in sight when on EQâŠresults were good in terms of size and strength gain but I was definitely not cutting. if you can control your hunger well (which I canât) then I think itâs ok.
I havenât done deca yet but I am looking forward to it.
EQ was cool but my BP was nutty over 300mg/wâŠit is normally high but it increased about 10-15 points with every 100mg/w.
Very good info guys! 2thepain, the question was for anyone who has input so yours is very welcome!
FG, i was thinking somethin like that may work too, using both while using test may prove to be a good cycle. But the dosages seem a little high to me. I was thinking 200/200/400 of EQ, Deca, and Test.
So next⊠Ive also been noticing and increase in the use of Clen and Tren, sometimes being used interchangably like EQ and Deca. How about these, whats your preference guys?
Tren is a very strong drug, a harsher version of Nor19 deca. It gives awesome strength gains and provides mainly high quality muscle. My complaint about tren is that is negatively effects my appetite. So using tren in bulking cycles is not for me. I would love to run it with every cutter that I ever do though.
Clen good at shedding fat, but I find no anabolic properties to go with it.