Circumcision Ban

Off Topic Politics & World Issues
301

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]countingbeans wrote:
I’m sorry are having trouble with your lack of foreskin.[/quote]

This is the gist of the situation. Western Civilization today has one end in mind…orgasm. They act rather like herion fiends about it, they throw everything out the window to get it. And, if anyone tries to stop them from reaching it it is a hate crime or someone is a prude or something.

We eat because of it, we sleep because of it, we workout because of it, we base our philosophy and theology around it.

When it comes down to circumcision…these guys have been told by someone that they are missing something, and without this piece of skin they can’t have the ultimate orgasm. So, they have been “mutilated” and it is understandable why they are upset. But, at the end of the day orgasms don’t make you happy, and not having a foreskin doesn’t take away feeling anyway. [/quote]

Busting a nut in my GF sure puts a smile on my face.[/quote]

I have no doubt it does, but does it truly make you happy to not be in a committed relationship? Objectifying your GF? I’d say each their own, but that is BS.[/quote]

???

???

???

You did read the bible, right?

The relationship you have in mind counts a woman as a mans property.

302

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]countingbeans wrote:
I’m sorry are having trouble with your lack of foreskin.[/quote]

This is the gist of the situation. Western Civilization today has one end in mind…orgasm. They act rather like herion fiends about it, they throw everything out the window to get it. And, if anyone tries to stop them from reaching it it is a hate crime or someone is a prude or something.

We eat because of it, we sleep because of it, we workout because of it, we base our philosophy and theology around it.

When it comes down to circumcision…these guys have been told by someone that they are missing something, and without this piece of skin they can’t have the ultimate orgasm. So, they have been “mutilated” and it is understandable why they are upset. But, at the end of the day orgasms don’t make you happy, and not having a foreskin doesn’t take away feeling anyway. [/quote]

Busting a nut in my GF sure puts a smile on my face.[/quote]

I have no doubt it does, but does it truly make you happy to not be in a committed relationship? Objectifying your GF? I’d say each their own, but that is BS.[/quote]

???

???

???

You did read the bible, right?

The relationship you have in mind counts a woman as a mans property.

[/quote]

Sorry orion, I fail to see the problem in that.

303

[quote]MattyG35 wrote:

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]countingbeans wrote:
I’m sorry are having trouble with your lack of foreskin.[/quote]

This is the gist of the situation. Western Civilization today has one end in mind…orgasm. They act rather like herion fiends about it, they throw everything out the window to get it. And, if anyone tries to stop them from reaching it it is a hate crime or someone is a prude or something.

We eat because of it, we sleep because of it, we workout because of it, we base our philosophy and theology around it.

When it comes down to circumcision…these guys have been told by someone that they are missing something, and without this piece of skin they can’t have the ultimate orgasm. So, they have been “mutilated” and it is understandable why they are upset. But, at the end of the day orgasms don’t make you happy, and not having a foreskin doesn’t take away feeling anyway. [/quote]

Busting a nut in my GF sure puts a smile on my face.[/quote]

I have no doubt it does, but does it truly make you happy to not be in a committed relationship? Objectifying your GF? I’d say each their own, but that is BS.[/quote]

???

???

???

You did read the bible, right?

The relationship you have in mind counts a woman as a mans property.

[/quote]

Sorry orion, I fail to see the problem in that.
[/quote]

I dont either, but to lambast a man because he chooses not to do it does not come from a position of moral superiority.

304

[quote]orion wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]countingbeans wrote:
I’m sorry are having trouble with your lack of foreskin.[/quote]

This is the gist of the situation. Western Civilization today has one end in mind…orgasm. They act rather like herion fiends about it, they throw everything out the window to get it. And, if anyone tries to stop them from reaching it it is a hate crime or someone is a prude or something.

We eat because of it, we sleep because of it, we workout because of it, we base our philosophy and theology around it.

When it comes down to circumcision…these guys have been told by someone that they are missing something, and without this piece of skin they can’t have the ultimate orgasm. So, they have been “mutilated” and it is understandable why they are upset. But, at the end of the day orgasms don’t make you happy, and not having a foreskin doesn’t take away feeling anyway. [/quote]

Busting a nut in my GF sure puts a smile on my face.[/quote]

I have no doubt it does, but does it truly make you happy to not be in a committed relationship? Objectifying your GF? I’d say each their own, but that is BS.[/quote]

???

???

???

You did read the bible, right?

The relationship you have in mind counts a woman as a mans property.

[/quote]

Women are not man’s property, sorry. They are of equal dignity to men and therefore cannot be considered another person’s property. At least not justly and not truly.

305

[quote]orion wrote:
I dont either, but to lambast a man because he chooses not to do it does not come from a position of moral superiority.[/quote]

This is equal to purposeful ignorance. I’ll try to explain the best I can…but after I’ll have to refrain from comment in this thread as I’ve already hi-jacked it…sort of.

The relationship I am talking about is one of the highest forms of love a man can give to his wife, one in which he dies to himself for her daily and gives himself to her fully…marriage.

What you are saying you choose not to do is the complete opposite of what you are actually doing, sex outside of marriage with a significant other in modern days is equal to concubinage, except with concubinage at least she’d be taken care of if she were to become pregnant, whether that would happen or not is only a matter of your personal pedigree and the family courts in your country.

306

[quote]thethirdruffian wrote:

[quote]Alex Good wrote:

If I could change one thing about my life I would stop that damned doctor from removing my foreskin at birth. Fucking medical quacks.[/quote]

You must have a very uneventful life, if that’s your big complaint.

(Or you are queer and the butt sex is not as easy without the foreskin, which, if that’s your case, I guess you have a legitimate problem.)[/quote]

They took too much off the top and basically made my erections extremely uncomfortable for years until the skin stretched to accommodate what was underneath. And now I have stretch marks.

And yes, I do oppose the piercing of a baby’s ears. It’s not permanent so it’s not nearly as bad but it’s still wrong. You don’t screw with the physiology of another.

307

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]countingbeans wrote:
I’m sorry are having trouble with your lack of foreskin.[/quote]

This is the gist of the situation. Western Civilization today has one end in mind…orgasm. They act rather like herion fiends about it, they throw everything out the window to get it. And, if anyone tries to stop them from reaching it it is a hate crime or someone is a prude or something.

We eat because of it, we sleep because of it, we workout because of it, we base our philosophy and theology around it.

When it comes down to circumcision…these guys have been told by someone that they are missing something, and without this piece of skin they can’t have the ultimate orgasm. So, they have been “mutilated” and it is understandable why they are upset. But, at the end of the day orgasms don’t make you happy, and not having a foreskin doesn’t take away feeling anyway. [/quote]

Busting a nut in my GF sure puts a smile on my face.[/quote]

I have no doubt it does, but does it truly make you happy to not be in a committed relationship? Objectifying your GF? I’d say each their own, but that is BS.[/quote]

Who said we’re not in a committed relationship?

308

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]countingbeans wrote:
I’m sorry are having trouble with your lack of foreskin.[/quote]

This is the gist of the situation. Western Civilization today has one end in mind…orgasm. They act rather like herion fiends about it, they throw everything out the window to get it. And, if anyone tries to stop them from reaching it it is a hate crime or someone is a prude or something.

We eat because of it, we sleep because of it, we workout because of it, we base our philosophy and theology around it.

When it comes down to circumcision…these guys have been told by someone that they are missing something, and without this piece of skin they can’t have the ultimate orgasm. So, they have been “mutilated” and it is understandable why they are upset. But, at the end of the day orgasms don’t make you happy, and not having a foreskin doesn’t take away feeling anyway. [/quote]

Busting a nut in my GF sure puts a smile on my face.[/quote]

I have no doubt it does, but does it truly make you happy to not be in a committed relationship? Objectifying your GF? I’d say each their own, but that is BS.[/quote]

Who said we’re not in a committed relationship?[/quote]

Hah I was just about to post that, he said “GF” not “girl from bar last night”. But from most Catholics I know, committed just means unhappy relationship you can’t get out of because of religious beliefs so I can see how it might be confusing.

309

[quote]Makavali wrote:

Who said we’re not in a committed relationship?[/quote]

You’re married? Didn’t know that.

310

[quote]Sloth wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

Who said we’re not in a committed relationship?[/quote]

You’re married? Didn’t know that.
[/quote]

Do you want to get married? If so you’ll be hard pressed to find a woman uninterested in pre marital sex.

311

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]Sloth wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

Who said we’re not in a committed relationship?[/quote]

You’re married? Didn’t know that.
[/quote]

Do you want to get married? If so you’ll be hard pressed to find a woman uninterested in pre marital sex.

[/quote]

Are you suggesting he should forget his morals because something is difficult?

312

[quote]countingbeans wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]Sloth wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

Who said we’re not in a committed relationship?[/quote]

You’re married? Didn’t know that.
[/quote]

Do you want to get married? If so you’ll be hard pressed to find a woman uninterested in pre marital sex.

[/quote]

Are you suggesting he should forget his morals because something is difficult?[/quote]

I am stating the reality of life in north America. If you want to get married you must play the game.

Or you can stick to these morals and never procreate which I KNOW he places a lot of value in.

It is what is, basically.

313

[quote]therajraj wrote:

Or you can stick to these morals and never procreate [/quote]

This is untrue, and not even a logically sound arguement.

I’m just curious why you have to make up things to demean his views?

314

[quote]countingbeans wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

Or you can stick to these morals and never procreate [/quote]

This is untrue, and not even a logically sound arguement.

I’m just curious why you have to make up things to demean his views?[/quote]

Demeaning? Really?

What have I made up?

315

If it is your goal to marry and procreate you’ll have to let your premarital sex rule slide. If stating that is demeaning okay.

316

[quote]therajraj wrote:
If it is your goal to marry and procreate you’ll have to let your premarital sex rule slide. If stating that is demeaning okay.[/quote]

People had more morals back in the good ol’ days and did not demean themselves by having premarital sex. This means most women had to wait until they were 13-15 years old to get married and have sex.

317

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]Sloth wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

Who said we’re not in a committed relationship?[/quote]

You’re married? Didn’t know that.
[/quote]

Do you want to get married? If so you’ll be hard pressed to find a woman uninterested in pre marital sex.

[/quote]

I don’t think he does want to get married or “play the game” for that matter. He would lose his credibility as an expert in these subject matters he finds so interesting by doing that.

318

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]countingbeans wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]Sloth wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

Who said we’re not in a committed relationship?[/quote]

You’re married? Didn’t know that.
[/quote]

Do you want to get married? If so you’ll be hard pressed to find a woman uninterested in pre marital sex.

[/quote]

Are you suggesting he should forget his morals because something is difficult?[/quote]

I am stating the reality of life in north America. If you want to get married you must play the game.

Or you can stick to these morals and never procreate which I KNOW he places a lot of value in.

It is what is, basically.

[/quote]

Actually, I’m sterile. I’ve a complicated medical history, thanks for asking. But it’s actually your secular modern ladies who are childless. Contracepted to the gills that they are. That’s why you’ve been panicking about Muslims replacing Europeans lately, remember?

319

[quote]sufiandy wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]Sloth wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

Who said we’re not in a committed relationship?[/quote]

You’re married? Didn’t know that.
[/quote]

Do you want to get married? If so you’ll be hard pressed to find a woman uninterested in pre marital sex.

[/quote]

I don’t think he does want to get married or “play the game” for that matter. He would lose his credibility as an expert in these subject matters he finds so interesting by doing that.[/quote]

On the contrary, I would marry and adopt.

320

Any other personal questions, unrelated to the topic (my sex life), I can answer for you two? Just curious.