[quote]pushharder wrote:
Harold, you’re making this all about you and I. It isn’t. Relax.[/quote]
Push your jig is up. You got called out yet again and here you are attempting to deflect when the truth has stared you in the eye from multiple people.
A man would step up and own his words and behavior. You say shit like relax all the time after people call you out. You know why you do that? (Of course you do). So people will stop hammering you on points.
You made this SPECIFICALLY because of what I said AND put my name in the thread. This is an absolute waste of forum space and has nothing to do with politics or world issues.
In essence it’s one thing to troll threads like you do and here you created one.
[quote]pushharder wrote:
Harold, you’re making this all about you and I. It isn’t. Relax.[/quote]
Push your jig is up. You got called out yet again and here you are attempting to deflect when the truth has stared you in the eye from multiple people.
A man would step up and own his words and behavior. You say shit like relax all the time after people call you out. You know why you do that? (Of course you do). So people will stop hammering you on points.
You made this SPECIFICALLY because of what I said AND put my name in the thread. This is an absolute waste of forum space and has nothing to do with politics or world issues.
In essence it’s one thing to troll threads like you do and here you created one.
[/quote]
I personally think it serves some utility .
[/quote]
Perhaps. Namely a place to show Push how inconsistent his posting is on what he expects vs. how he acts. Notice how he will skim over all of that (Push isn’t a big fan of reading other people’s words) and ignore it. He sees it, but he doesn’t have to act like he sees it. A lack of maturity is a hallmark of him.
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
One thing that remains is the concept . IMO it denotes a Group of people that mentally stroke each other . They are more concerned with winning rather than expanding one’s perspective .
[/quote]
Doesn’t this pretty much apply universally to all groups? [/quote]
I can only speak for this board because I do not have any more time to waste but The So called conservatives have a Union of sorts . They fight other people’s fights they gang up and just generally over run any so called liberal .
The so called liberals all pretty much stand alone , they fight their own battles
[/quote]
Did you ever think that maybe the “conservatives” just share a common point of view and respond accordingly? I could see how that would appear like ganging up, although, I don’t think it is.
I agree there are more “conservatives” on these boards, which makes it more prevalent, but if you look close enough little groups emerge in a lot of threads.
I should say, it seems to me, very few posters take the time to thoroughly read and think about a persons post. Smh is an example of one of the few I think is very good about this. Instead a speedy response to “win” is the norm, which imo is why conversation turns to arguing almost immediately.
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
I should say, it seems to me, very few posters take the time to thoroughly read and think about a persons post. Smh is an example of one of the few I think is very good about this. Instead a speedy response to “win” is the norm, which imo is why conversation turns to arguing almost immediately. [/quote]
Many thanks good sir. I do try to read everything, though I admit that sometimes I’ll miss something. And, of course, my respect for you as a poster goes without saying.
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
I should say, it seems to me, very few posters take the time to thoroughly read and think about a persons post. Smh is an example of one of the few I think is very good about this. Instead a speedy response to “win” is the norm, which imo is why conversation turns to arguing almost immediately. [/quote]
Many thanks good sir. I do try to read everything, though I admit that sometimes I’ll miss something. And, of course, my respect for you as a poster goes without saying.[/quote]
No thanks necessary, I think the sub-forum would significantly improve if everyone was a diligent as you are when responding (myself included!).
Nothing says “whimsical” like calling someone out with a troll name (which you continue) and talking about cum on one’s hand. Which funnily enough is yet another example of you talking about dicks and jizz while being against gay marriage, but maybe pushharder isn’t talking about the weight room? Ooh, look who else is witty enough to come up with something based off a name.
I don’t want to prosecute you, you’re just a flat out troll. And your intent (which you now are deflecting from including why you started the thread which is directly after I said circle jerk) which you are now trying to duck from.
Essentially you’re attempting to play politician and act like you didn’t have any intentions. I don’t want to prosecute you, you embarrass yourself enough lately.
Matty already showed you. You ignored it. Just like you ignored me pointing out your hypocrisy from other threads.
You don’t read other people’s words because you aren’t interested in them. You act above most of the forum when most people post circles around you all the time. In the few threads that you actually try to participate in and not run around trolling.
Let’s post this hypocrisy one more time for Push to see from his own words:
You can probably find 500 examples of Push doing exactly what he rails against above and everyone knows it.
Again, I’m just asking that you grow up and man up.
Also quit attempting to lie about the thread Push. I said circle jerk and you posted it after me and you put my name in the thread. Quit acting like you were talking to beans or trying to be whimsical. Shit, quit hiding from your behavior and own it is all anyone is saying. “harold” makes you sound like a middle schooler instead of a middle aged man.
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
I should say, it seems to me, very few posters take the time to thoroughly read and think about a persons post. Smh is an example of one of the few I think is very good about this. Instead a speedy response to “win” is the norm, which imo is why conversation turns to arguing almost immediately. [/quote]
Indeed. If you look at the get rid of religon thread you will see two posters (one of which started this thread about me) who did not even read my words and yet personally attacked my arguments. One of them admitted they didn’t read it.
Some people on here have some vendettas based off past stuff and the OP is one of them.
I’m by no means perfect, but I’ve attempted to be much better than I was at the beginning where frankly I was a bit immature. I can man up and own that, all I’m asking is if the OP can.
…(which you now are deflecting from including why you started the thread which is directly after I said circle jerk)…
[/quote]
OK, Harold, since you insist on making this all about you, yes, your circle jerk comment reminded me of all the others who’ve used it in the past but it was Beans and me disagreeing on drone strikes that caused me to start the thread.
So there. There’s the credit you are so desperately seeking.
IT’S.
NOT.
ABOUT.
YOU.
[/quote]
I’m not seeking credit, you’re just an arrogant troll liar. That much is obvious. You hide and deflect all you want. I’m done with you.
And if you’re going to lie and pretend something wasn’t about me why put my name in the title (which isn’t even my name, but a personal attack you insist on using because you act like you’re ten). People put out the information in front of you in two different threads now and you just ignore it. You just skim past it because your purpose in PWI is to annoy and not to discuss and learn from. You can see that with how you almost NEVER actually quote a post and talk about that post specifically.
C-dog now has company with Push. Best of luck on your future trolling and I’m sure you can call me out now without me seeing it. What a waste of everyone’s time this thread has been. Which is exactly what your posts are.
Did you ever think that maybe the “conservatives” just share a common point of view and respond accordingly? I could see how that would appear like ganging up, although, I don’t think it is.
I agree there are more “conservatives” on these boards, which makes it more prevalent, but if you look close enough little groups emerge in a lot of threads. [/quote]
I think the so called liberals share points of view as well but the so called liberals IMO are more concerned with Debate, Information and Learning than the aproach of winning by any means
