[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
I made it through about 20 minutes of a Debbie Blue “sermon” from her “church” website. A female “pastor” to begin with. She is a fruity, clueless, blaspheming, biblically illiterate product of this age who illustrates perfectly why this nation is decaying from the inside out. Like wow man. She sounds like a valley girl. Whatever that is? It ain’t the living God of the bible.
All I had to read was “united methodist” about the other guy and I knew the satanic post modern liberalism I’m in for there too. Call me what you want. I can take it and I’m used to it. The God of Abraham, Issac and Jacob is good and beautiful indeed. He reserves the hottest parts of hell for people who reproach and dishonor His glorious name with their anti biblical self worshiping idolatry.
Aragorn. I knew when we spoke last year, but you disappoint me grievously man. I know you don’t care.
Here ya go Brother Chen. If you are so inclined. Sermons | House of Mercy Have a vomit bag handy and be prepared to have your heart broken by seeing the Lord your God, the holy one of Israel, the ancient of days treated with such disdain. [/quote]
Well I am sorry you feel that way. I doubt you will do so, but you might give the book a read. It is the only exposure I have had to her and I don’t know her or follow her. Sorry. But it was an interesting read from a different perspective. Also I have no idea what you have against female pastors.
You paint with far too broad a brush friend. Not all united methodists are the same you know, just like Catholics and Protestants are not all the same. I’m surprised to see you play that card, you should know better–just as there are Baptists who would make the term “liberal” seem positively puritanical, so there are “united methodists” who don’t toe the official party line. I thought you would have recognized that at least enough to avoid making a surface judgment on that particular author, who, incidentally, has said some things you would probably definitely agree with. Nobody agrees with each other 100% anyways, so if that’s your yardstick for measuring “being saved” I feel bad for you. Even the apostles disagreed over some pretty serious issues in their day, and people of that early church did as well, while still being “Christian”.
Besides which I did not suggest the book on its theological and historical merits. Nor did I suggest it with “conversion” in mind. I suggested it because it is an interesting read into how somebody can hold that “God is Good” view that you have, when it looks stupid to others. The psychology of the thing, so to speak (and that is not meant in a derisive or “pathological” way, simple subject categorization, that’s all). And it is not preachy or pretentious.
Seriously, you might try reading the book before you crap on it and the author. I didn’t recommend it for YOU either, but I at least have the decency to do that with the books people recommend to me, even if I end up being right. I try not to judge a book’s content without having read it first.
Shit, CS Lewis was an Anglican! He couldn’t POSSIBLY have anything relevant or meaningful to say about Protestant Christianity! Nor could J.R.R. Tolkien—he was a bloody CATHOLIC. Come on, you ought to know better.