What’s up fellas,
Interesting thread here - lot’s of different ways to the same end.
One thing I wanted to chyme in on was that I almost completely agree with Nate Dogg. From what a lot of you are posting, you are trying to do a Ronnie Colman w/o, but with the IV of anabolics! I think you could simplify, both in number of exercises and rep ranges. ALL parts of your chest get worked with just about any pressing/flying movement!
You truly only need one exercise per body part per w/o to get an effective lift. Throwing in two is fine, but watch the total volume. There is no need to go flat barbell, incline barbell, decline dumbbell, flies, etc… that is over-kill and is actually retarding your growth.
Also, remember that white fast twitch muscle fibers have the biggest potential for growth. These fibers can only be stimulated two main ways (without getting too deep in muscle physiology). One is keeping the load heavy, say between 80 and 95% of your 1RM. Two is keeping the reps per set between 3 and 6 and using 100% effort and maximum speed of execution on each rep. Things like heavy lockouts, heavy negatives, and heavy rest-pauses are some of the most effective strength/size builders. But, your body can only handle those poundages for so many weeks.
Therefore, my next point is that none of you should say “this is what my chest day looks like”. You instead should be saying, “this is what I am doing for the next 4-6 weeks.” Remember, your body is the most advanced instrument on the planet - it adapts very quickly. Doing the same (or similar) routine month after month, year after year, is NOT productive. Sure you will see some gains, but at maybe 1-2% (more with drugs of course). Versus maybe a 5-15+% increase in strength/mass by cycling EVERY 4-6 weeks. Do a routine that you thought you would hate and watch your mass increases skyrocket!
Watch “mixing” rep ranges within the same session. Take the pyramid approach for example. After a warm-up, you hit a medium working set and then progressively get heavier with fewer reps. Say starting at 10 and going to 3. This is very confusing to the nervous system, becaue at the 10 rep level, your red fast twitch is firing, then as you get heavier, your white must then kick in. Therefore, you often times will not hit either fiber optimally. It may indeed give you a great pump, but that is a very poor way to rank a w/o. Notice that most of the T-Nation experts keep you at about the same rep range each set, but they vary load, TUT, and tempo.
Also, concerning the white fast twitch fibers: they consume the most stored energy (ATP) and go it at a faster rate than any other type of fiber. Because of this they are so strong and can grow quickly, however if you rob them of your stored ATP by doing lighter sets, then make them use creatine phoshate or pyruvate for fuel in the middle or end of the workout, they will not be stressed as greatly. Therefore, to hit the white fast twitch properly, warm-up then proceed directly into heavy reps. Then, if you want to hit some medium load sets, place them after. I really found hitting 3 x 6 using my 7 or 8 RM, then hitting ONE set to near failure of 60% of my 1RM max very effective in mass and strength gain.
I had to mention the “pump” thing and going to failure since I was already typing… you actually want to AVOID getting huge, bulging pumps (even though the girls think it’s cool looking!). Why? Short version - when you get a tight pump, you have made your muscle cell walls impermiable to fluids which can hamper oxygen flow and nutrition!
As for going to failure, same principle - at failure, your muscles are flooded with chemicals (lactic acid and free phosphates) that prevent further work to be done. In both cases you are hindering your w/o capicity and from getting fully stimulated muscle fibers. Again, T-Nation gurus can concure with me, they are usually saying to NOT go to failure… now you know why.
I like the slpit that Nate Dogg referred to especially: going heavy with a 3x8, then hitting an 8x3 in the next bout.
KIS (Keep It Simple)!!!