[quote]skaz05 wrote:
For the past 8 years, Jon Stewart’s bread and butter has been Bush and Cheney, without them his show definitely wouldn’t have lasted as long as it has.
Comedy is incredibly easy when your main source of material is Bush, take Bill Maher for another prime example. 8 years ago it was “Bill WHO?”, now that retard has his own HBO show.
Without Bush, many of today’s comedians’ bits would only be 5 or 6 minutes long. Yes, comedy is incredibly easy when your main source of material is Bush.
Another thing I hate about Stewart is that he claims to be a mere comedian and therefore he is infalliable and cannot be criticized for his crticism of Bush and Cheney, but he continues to push an obvious bias on his show which does, at times, come across as a news show where he gets to do his cute little “I hate Bush” monolouge every night. Just like…Olbermann…
I only watch his stupid show because of Rob Riggle.
Fuck Stewart, I guarantee he will retire after Obama gets elected.[/quote]
Er… the Daily Show started before Bush… and will continue after him. In fact, they’re at their best during election years, and tend to snooze a bit other wise. They make the occasional Bush joke, yes, but he’s not their main source of mocking.
They mock the retardation of the system. Yes, they lean left, but their humor doesn’t. When they talk seriously they tend to take the democrats side, but trust me when I say the humor of the show comes at the expense of the system.
If Obama is elected, he will have the same amount of material he always does, because the bureaucracy will still be retarded, Representatives will still reference Klingons (spelling?), pro-life politicians will still bring children holding plastic fetuses to a protest, and there will still be organizations like Guns for Tots that make more than half the country facepalm.