Catholicism - Heart and Soul of a Great Nation

Mat 23:29 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! because ye build the tombs of the prophets, and garnish the sepulchres of the righteous,
Mat 23:30 And say, If we had been in the days of our fathers, we would not have been partakers with them in the blood of the prophets.
Mat 23:31 Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the children of them which killed the prophets.
Mat 23:32 Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers.
Mat 23:33 Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?
Mat 23:34 Wherefore, behold, I send unto you prophets, and wise men, and scribes: and some of them ye shall kill and crucify; and some of them shall ye scourge in your synagogues, and persecute them from city to city:

Inquisitions? Violent suppression of groups and communities of Christians who chose to live outside the authority of Rome? Imprisonment, torture and sometimes even execution of those who tries to make the scriptures available to the people?

Mat 6:7 But when ye pray, use not vain repetitions, as the heathen do: for they think that they shall be heard for their much speaking.

Should prayer be a prescribed ritual or an honest attempt to humble ourselves before God? Do we
need to recite magic incantaions or does God search our hearts in order to discern our faith?

1Ti 4:1 Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils;
1Ti 4:2 Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot iron;
1Ti 4:3 Forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from meats, which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving of them which believe and know the truth.

The vow of chastity: Does it free men to devote themselves to the work of God, or protect the church from having their wealth devoured by widows?

Certainly many members of the Roman Catholic laity have done many good works. Many Roman Catholics have demonstrated their love for Christ by keeping HIS commandments. However, the institution itself has been an abomination for more than a thousand years.

[quote]honest_lifter wrote:

We are commanded to be no part of the world. To have traditions of pagan origins adopted into christian beliefs would go against that command, and therefore would be disapproved by God and Jesus. That is my point.

[/quote]

Does this mean you do not celebrate the birth of Christ in ANY form or fashion? Even if it be devoid of ANY pagan traditions? If so, Why?

[quote]cueball wrote:

[quote]honest_lifter wrote:

We are commanded to be no part of the world. To have traditions of pagan origins adopted into christian beliefs would go against that command, and therefore would be disapproved by God and Jesus. That is my point.

[/quote]

Does this mean you do not celebrate the birth of Christ in ANY form or fashion? Even if it be devoid of ANY pagan traditions? If so, Why?[/quote]

Thank you for asking, cueball. I do not celebrate the birth of Christ in any form. The reason for this is because it was not something that was requested of us in the Bible, nor does the Bible supply the necessary information for us to do such a thing.

I do, however, commemorate the memorial of Christ’s death. - Luke Chapter 22.

This WAS a commission found in the Bible, and the exact day was given, Nisan 14, which this year fell on Tuesday, March 30th, 2010.

Christmas has pagan origins and was modified for use by the church to celebrate the birth of Jesus. Remember, someone made up all holidays at one point (including Easter). So if you want to celebrate it, go for it.

[quote]honest_lifter wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]honest_lifter wrote:

[quote]katzenjammer wrote:

[quote]honest_lifter wrote:

[quote]katzenjammer wrote:

[quote]honest_lifter wrote:

The holiday of Christmas is pagan. There is no proof anywhere in the Bible of the day of Jesus’ birth. That is the truth.[/quote]

No, it’s another example of your half truths. Do you need proof that Jesus was born?

As I said, much of it - the date, many of the customs, etc - are pagan. The origins of Christmas are extremely complex. THIS^ little summary, however, is false. But works well in one sense at least: it’s nice and catchy, easy to remember, and easy to recite rapidly when someone’s trying to close the door. [/quote]

Well at least we agree that the date and many of the customs are pagan. So what are the origins of Christmas then?[/quote]

Christmas is a celebration of the birth of Our Savior. And, more fundamentally, the entire Season celebrates the the Mystery of the Incarnation. [/quote]

OK, but what are the origins of Christmas? [/quote]

Now this is detailed! It will answer all questions about origin and reason.
[/quote]

Pat, I read it. Was there a particular portion in their that I was suppose to focus on that put this as non-pagan origins? It seems to agree with what I found. [/quote]

You miss read it if you think it’s a pagan holiday.

[quote]BackInAction wrote:
Christmas has pagan origins and was modified for use by the church to celebrate the birth of Jesus. Remember, someone made up all holidays at one point (including Easter). So if you want to celebrate it, go for it.[/quote]

Sorry, I shouldn’t use the term Christmas. Whatever holiday had the traditional tree was taken. Then they deemed it Christmas. But alas, this is only from my memory and may not be correct.

[quote]BackInAction wrote:
Christmas has pagan origins and was modified for use by the church to celebrate the birth of Jesus. Remember, someone made up all holidays at one point (including Easter). So if you want to celebrate it, go for it.[/quote]

You are correct about easter as well.
http://www.christiananswers.net/q-eden/edn-t020.html

We must all do our due diligence, as we are all responsible for our own actions in the end.

[quote]honest_lifter wrote:

[quote]cueball wrote:

[quote]honest_lifter wrote:

We are commanded to be no part of the world. To have traditions of pagan origins adopted into christian beliefs would go against that command, and therefore would be disapproved by God and Jesus. That is my point.

[/quote]

Does this mean you do not celebrate the birth of Christ in ANY form or fashion? Even if it be devoid of ANY pagan traditions? If so, Why?[/quote]

Thank you for asking, cueball. I do not celebrate the birth of Christ in any form. The reason for this is because it was not something that was requested of us in the Bible, nor does the Bible supply the necessary information for us to do such a thing.[/quote]

Do you feel then that commemorating Christ’s birth, or resurrection for that matter, is against God’s Word/the Bible?

Or another way, since the Bible doesn’t command it, you don’t feel any desire, spiritual or otherwise, to commemorate His birth or resurrection even if it was done in a fashion devoid of pagan traditions?

[quote]I do, however, commemorate the memorial of Christ’s death. - Luke Chapter 22.

This WAS a commission found in the Bible, and the exact day was given, Nisan 14, which this year fell on Tuesday, March 30th, 2010.[/quote]

Are referring to verse 19?

[quote]honest_lifter wrote:

[quote]BackInAction wrote:
Christmas has pagan origins and was modified for use by the church to celebrate the birth of Jesus. Remember, someone made up all holidays at one point (including Easter). So if you want to celebrate it, go for it.[/quote]

You are correct about easter as well.
http://www.christiananswers.net/q-eden/edn-t020.html

We must all do our due diligence, as we are all responsible for our own actions in the end.[/quote]

If I were you, I’d think very carefully about your advice - and whether or not you’re actually following it yourself.

[quote]katzenjammer wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]honest_lifter wrote:

[quote]katzenjammer wrote:

[quote]honest_lifter wrote:

[quote]katzenjammer wrote:

[quote]honest_lifter wrote:

The holiday of Christmas is pagan. There is no proof anywhere in the Bible of the day of Jesus’ birth. That is the truth.[/quote]

No, it’s another example of your half truths. Do you need proof that Jesus was born?

As I said, much of it - the date, many of the customs, etc - are pagan. The origins of Christmas are extremely complex. THIS^ little summary, however, is false. But works well in one sense at least: it’s nice and catchy, easy to remember, and easy to recite rapidly when someone’s trying to close the door. [/quote]

Well at least we agree that the date and many of the customs are pagan. So what are the origins of Christmas then?[/quote]

Christmas is a celebration of the birth of Our Savior. And, more fundamentally, the entire Season celebrates the the Mystery of the Incarnation. [/quote]

OK, but what are the origins of Christmas? [/quote]

Now this is detailed! It will answer all questions about origin and reason.
[/quote]

Now see, that just won’t do Pat. It’s too long and complicated :wink: [/quote]

I’ve been reading these post and I thought I’d chime in. Katz you have it wrong when you say that the Catholic church started before the Bible. Honest lifter has it exactly right in that Constantine melded Roman pagan beliefs with Christian beliefs and started Catholicism in the forth century AD. Before that there was no church. A church is a building or place of worship. What started in 33 C.E. with the Apostles and Jesus’ followers is the Christian Congregation. This was the true Christian religion. But Jesus at Matthew 24:11 stated that many false prophets would arise and mislead many. And this started to happen in the first century A.D. because the Bible writers warned of this in their letters. Paul states this at Acts 20:29 and 30 where he states that opressive wolves would enter into the flock and speak twisted things and draw disciple away to themselves. Paul warns at Colossian 2:8 where he states:
“Look out: perhaps there may be someone who will carry YOU off as his prey through the philosophy and empty deception according to the tradition of men, according to the elementary things of the world and not according to Christ.”

There are many other scriptures that warn to not deviate beyond the things Jesus taught. But these warning didn’t stop this from happening. In fact Jesus prophysied that this would happen with the wheat and the weeds illustration. Jesus foretold that apostates, like weeds sown among wheat, would infiltrate the Christian congregation and mislead many.

God’s dealing with the nation of Israel shows that God cares about how he is worshiped. God repeatedly warned the Israelites to not mix in the forms of worship that the surrounding nations practiced. Baal worship was popular with some of the surrouding nations, when the Israelites started to include this in their worship to God, he did not say… well it’s okay, they’re still following the Mosaic Law and worshipping me I don’t mind that they’re practicing something false. No, once the Israelite mixed in Baal worship with their God directed worship he repeatedly warned them and eventually let the surrounding nations conquer them as a punishment.

The problem I see with most Christian religions is that when they see the Bible clearly addresses a subject they don’t adjust their thinking to be in line with the Bibles. For example, the problem that the Catholic church is experiencing with the sexual abuse by the priest, many blame this on the fact that they can’t marry. Now I’m not saying that this is 100% the reason, it may or may not be. But the Bible is clear on this subject. Notice what
1 Timothy 4:1-3 states:
However, the inspired utterance says definitely that in later periods of time some will fall away from the faith, paying attention to MISLEADING INSPIRED UTTERANCES AND TEACHINGS OF DEMONS, by the hypocrisy of men who speak lies, marked in their conscience as with a branding iron; FORBIDDING TO MARRY, commanding to abstain from foods which God created to be partaken of with thanksgiving by those who have faith and accurately know the truth."

FORBIDDING TO MARRY is a teaching of demons. This is clear and direct. So you’d think that when the Catholic Clergy class read these verses they would adjust their thinking and say that it is now OK to marry. The bible actually encourages marriage at 1 Corinthians 7:8,9:
“Now I say to the unmarried persons and the widows, it is well for them that they remain even as I am. But if they do not have self-control, let them marry, for it is better to marry than to be inflamed with passion.”

So why would the larget Christian religion not adjust there thinking when they see a clear and direct scripture that not only states that it is wrong to practice something but actually states that it is a teaching of demons? Do you think God has changed? Do you think that he approves of a group that believes a teaching of a demon and makes it an official doctrine. He did not accept this with the Israelites and he inspired Bible writers to warn of the same thing in the Christian-Greek scriptures so it is clear that he did not accept this with the Christian congregation.
When my religion was in it’s infancy we believed things that were contrary to Bible teaching, but when we would see this we as a group would adjust our thinking and change our beliefs to be inline with the Bibles.

[quote]cueball wrote:

[quote]honest_lifter wrote:

[quote]cueball wrote:

[quote]honest_lifter wrote:

We are commanded to be no part of the world. To have traditions of pagan origins adopted into christian beliefs would go against that command, and therefore would be disapproved by God and Jesus. That is my point.

[/quote]

Does this mean you do not celebrate the birth of Christ in ANY form or fashion? Even if it be devoid of ANY pagan traditions? If so, Why?[/quote]

Thank you for asking, cueball. I do not celebrate the birth of Christ in any form. The reason for this is because it was not something that was requested of us in the Bible, nor does the Bible supply the necessary information for us to do such a thing.[/quote]

Do you feel then that commemorating Christ’s birth, or resurrection for that matter, is against God’s Word/the Bible?

Or another way, since the Bible doesn’t command it, you don’t feel any desire, spiritual or otherwise, to commemorate His birth or resurrection even if it was done in a fashion devoid of pagan traditions?

[quote]I do, however, commemorate the memorial of Christ’s death. - Luke Chapter 22.

This WAS a commission found in the Bible, and the exact day was given, Nisan 14, which this year fell on Tuesday, March 30th, 2010.[/quote]

Are referring to verse 19?[/quote]

You can choose to remember it, absolutely. That is a personal choice that I don’t believe is directly commanded against in the Bible.

When we commemorate what is mentioned, as you correctly brought out, at vs. 19, we do it devoid of any pagan traditions.

[quote]honest_lifter wrote:

[quote]cueball wrote:

[quote]honest_lifter wrote:

[quote]cueball wrote:

[quote]honest_lifter wrote:

We are commanded to be no part of the world. To have traditions of pagan origins adopted into christian beliefs would go against that command, and therefore would be disapproved by God and Jesus. That is my point.

[/quote]

Does this mean you do not celebrate the birth of Christ in ANY form or fashion? Even if it be devoid of ANY pagan traditions? If so, Why?[/quote]

Thank you for asking, cueball. I do not celebrate the birth of Christ in any form. The reason for this is because it was not something that was requested of us in the Bible, nor does the Bible supply the necessary information for us to do such a thing.[/quote]

Do you feel then that commemorating Christ’s birth, or resurrection for that matter, is against God’s Word/the Bible?

Or another way, since the Bible doesn’t command it, you don’t feel any desire, spiritual or otherwise, to commemorate His birth or resurrection even if it was done in a fashion devoid of pagan traditions?

[quote]I do, however, commemorate the memorial of Christ’s death. - Luke Chapter 22.

This WAS a commission found in the Bible, and the exact day was given, Nisan 14, which this year fell on Tuesday, March 30th, 2010.[/quote]

Are referring to verse 19?[/quote]

You can choose to remember it, absolutely. That is a personal choice that I don’t believe is directly commanded against in the Bible.

When we commemorate what is mentioned, as you correctly brought out, at vs. 19, we do it devoid of any pagan traditions.[/quote]

You didn’t answer my question. Why do you choose not to commemorate either of the events I mentioned-devoid of pagan traditions?

I will return to this discussion Monday. I hope you will continue it with me then.

[quote]mse2us wrote:
A church is a building or place of worship.
[/quote]

Wrong. That is simply NOT what the Church is. Unfortunately for you, your whole argument turns on that (false) premise.

[quote]honest_lifter wrote:

[quote]BackInAction wrote:
Christmas has pagan origins and was modified for use by the church to celebrate the birth of Jesus. Remember, someone made up all holidays at one point (including Easter). So if you want to celebrate it, go for it.[/quote]

You are correct about easter as well.
http://www.christiananswers.net/q-eden/edn-t020.html

We must all do our due diligence, as we are all responsible for our own actions in the end.[/quote]

I can tell you that the Blood of Christ has covered all my sins. Does this mean I should continue to sin no, but I am human. If you are relying on your actions to get you into heaven you need to reread the Bible.

[quote]cueball wrote:

[quote]honest_lifter wrote:

[quote]cueball wrote:

[quote]honest_lifter wrote:

[quote]cueball wrote:

[quote]honest_lifter wrote:

We are commanded to be no part of the world. To have traditions of pagan origins adopted into christian beliefs would go against that command, and therefore would be disapproved by God and Jesus. That is my point.

[/quote]

Does this mean you do not celebrate the birth of Christ in ANY form or fashion? Even if it be devoid of ANY pagan traditions? If so, Why?[/quote]

Thank you for asking, cueball. I do not celebrate the birth of Christ in any form. The reason for this is because it was not something that was requested of us in the Bible, nor does the Bible supply the necessary information for us to do such a thing.[/quote]

Do you feel then that commemorating Christ’s birth, or resurrection for that matter, is against God’s Word/the Bible?

Or another way, since the Bible doesn’t command it, you don’t feel any desire, spiritual or otherwise, to commemorate His birth or resurrection even if it was done in a fashion devoid of pagan traditions?

[quote]I do, however, commemorate the memorial of Christ’s death. - Luke Chapter 22.

This WAS a commission found in the Bible, and the exact day was given, Nisan 14, which this year fell on Tuesday, March 30th, 2010.[/quote]

Are referring to verse 19?[/quote]

You can choose to remember it, absolutely. That is a personal choice that I don’t believe is directly commanded against in the Bible.

When we commemorate what is mentioned, as you correctly brought out, at vs. 19, we do it devoid of any pagan traditions.[/quote]

You didn’t answer my question. Why do you choose not to commemorate either of the events I mentioned-devoid of pagan traditions?

I will return to this discussion Monday. I hope you will continue it with me then.

[/quote]

Because I don’t see a reason to. Is a reason really required? It is a neutral topic in the Bible.

[quote]dmaddox wrote:

[quote]honest_lifter wrote:

[quote]BackInAction wrote:
Christmas has pagan origins and was modified for use by the church to celebrate the birth of Jesus. Remember, someone made up all holidays at one point (including Easter). So if you want to celebrate it, go for it.[/quote]

You are correct about easter as well.
http://www.christiananswers.net/q-eden/edn-t020.html

We must all do our due diligence, as we are all responsible for our own actions in the end.[/quote]

I can tell you that the Blood of Christ has covered all my sins. Does this mean I should continue to sin no, but I am human. If you are relying on your actions to get you into heaven you need to reread the Bible.[/quote]

We have covered this before, but I will repeat. If you know that Christ has covered all your sins, then why does it matter if continue to sin freely? It is because your actions show what is in your heart. If you choose to follow a wicked course and “know” that your sins are forgiven, that will clearly show what is in your heart.

[quote]honest_lifter wrote:

[quote]dmaddox wrote:

[quote]honest_lifter wrote:

[quote]BackInAction wrote:
Christmas has pagan origins and was modified for use by the church to celebrate the birth of Jesus. Remember, someone made up all holidays at one point (including Easter). So if you want to celebrate it, go for it.[/quote]

You are correct about easter as well.
http://www.christiananswers.net/q-eden/edn-t020.html

We must all do our due diligence, as we are all responsible for our own actions in the end.[/quote]

I can tell you that the Blood of Christ has covered all my sins. Does this mean I should continue to sin no, but I am human. If you are relying on your actions to get you into heaven you need to reread the Bible.[/quote]

We have covered this before, but I will repeat. If you know that Christ has covered all your sins, then why does it matter if continue to sin freely? It is because your actions show what is in your heart. If you choose to follow a wicked course and “know” that your sins are forgiven, that will clearly show what is in your heart.[/quote]

You should read St. Augustine’s Confessions - spend some time with him and you will not only find some highly productive ways of answering that question; you will even see the question differently; and will have generated many new and more interesting ones.

[quote]cueball wrote:

[quote]honest_lifter wrote:

[quote]cueball wrote:

[quote]honest_lifter wrote:

We are commanded to be no part of the world. To have traditions of pagan origins adopted into christian beliefs would go against that command, and therefore would be disapproved by God and Jesus. That is my point.

[/quote]

Does this mean you do not celebrate the birth of Christ in ANY form or fashion? Even if it be devoid of ANY pagan traditions? If so, Why?[/quote]

Thank you for asking, cueball. I do not celebrate the birth of Christ in any form. The reason for this is because it was not something that was requested of us in the Bible, nor does the Bible supply the necessary information for us to do such a thing.[/quote]

Do you feel then that commemorating Christ’s birth, or resurrection for that matter, is against God’s Word/the Bible?

Or another way, since the Bible doesn’t command it, you don’t feel any desire, spiritual or otherwise, to commemorate His birth or resurrection even if it was done in a fashion devoid of pagan traditions?

[quote]I do, however, commemorate the memorial of Christ’s death. - Luke Chapter 22.

This WAS a commission found in the Bible, and the exact day was given, Nisan 14, which this year fell on Tuesday, March 30th, 2010.[/quote]

Are referring to verse 19?[/quote]
That’s another good question! The main reasons Jesus came to earth was to offer himself as a sacrifice. The death of a perfect human was necessary to undo the inherited sin which results in death from our first father Adam. Jesus dying makes it possible for humans to not have to pay that penalty that was given to Adam and Eve (Romans 5:12) for sinning which is death (Romans 6:23). His death pays that penalty. Once one exercises faith in this ransom sacrifice they then can have the hope of living forever. Because of this, Jesus death is the most important event in human history and that’s why as Honest_lifter pointed out Jesus said to commemorate this event annually. Of course his birth is important as well as his resurrection but neither are as important as his sacrifice. That’s why you won’t find the celebration of his birth or his resurrection practiced in the Bible.

The fact that Christmas started out as a pagan religious event that had nothing to do with Jesus is why we don’t celebrate it. Imagine that 200 years from now people are celebrating the September 11, 2001 event as something good and applying this event to another celebration. If you were able to travel to the future and see this would you not be appauled? Now imagine if you went up to people during this celebration and said “what are you doing? Don’t you know that thousands of people died on that date. This shouldn’t be a joyous occasion, you shouldn’t be celebrating this.” Now if their response was “we know that that happened in the past but we don’t think of that event when we celebrate it we just like the big party that we have.” Most people would think they were wrong. We feel that God feels similiar due to the clear warnings in the Hebrew scriptures and the Christian-Greek scripture. God does not like when pagan and false doctrines are included in worship to him or if his servant participate in religious events that came from someting bad.

Now if there weren’t any paganism in Christmas we probably still wouldn’t celebrate it due to what Honest_lifter stated that Jesus commissioned his disciples be no part of this world. So alot of the customs that the people of the world follow we do not do. As one person pointed out all of the holidays have pagan orgins. We do however celebrate wedding aniversaries, graduations, retirements and so forth. None of those have pagan origins.

[quote]katzenjammer wrote:

[quote]mse2us wrote:
A church is a building or place of worship.
[/quote]

Wrong. That is simply NOT what the Church is. Unfortunately for you, your whole argument turns on that (false) premise. [/quote]
My point in that one sentence is that the first century christians were not called a church. They were called a congregation which according to dictionary.com is an assembly of persons brought together for common religious worship.

Look up the definition of church at dictionary.com you will see that the first definition is: a building for public Christian worship.

Do you see the difference? The congregation are the people, a church originally was just a building. The christians in the Bible would often meet in individuals homes to discuss the Bible. Later people broadly used the term Church to define the people. My whole argument is not about the definition of the word Church. I just stated that in one or two sentences. Did you read my whole reply. I know it’s long but if you read it you will see what it’s really talking about.

[quote]mse2us wrote:

[quote]katzenjammer wrote:

[quote]mse2us wrote:
A church is a building or place of worship.
[/quote]

Wrong. That is simply NOT what the Church is. Unfortunately for you, your whole argument turns on that (false) premise. [/quote]
My point in that one sentence is that the first century christians were not called a church. They were called a congregation which according to dictionary.com is an assembly of persons brought together for common religious worship.

Look up the definition of church at dictionary.com you will see that the first definition is: a building for public Christian worship.

Do you see the difference? The congregation are the people, a church originally was just a building. The christians in the Bible would often meet in individuals homes to discuss the Bible. Later people broadly used the term Church to define the people. My whole argument is not about the definition of the word Church. I just stated that in one or two sentences. Did you read my whole reply. I know it’s long but if you read it you will see what it’s really talking about.[/quote]

Sorry, I don’t go to “dictonary.com” for a definition of the Church.

What you’re really doing is asserting an arbitrary, fallacious, loaded definition of what the Church is - and from that arguing your “loaded” case. Which is another way of saying that you’re playing word games.

I’ll repeat: the Church is not a building. You clearly don’t understand what the Church is; therefore, it is not possible for you to argue which came first.