[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
[quote]therajraj wrote:
Do you believe Jesus was divine?
[/quote]
That is actually an interesting question and not to dodge the question but it depends on what you mean by divinity. I believe he spoke truth.
I believe his human life had extra special value. hah.[/quote]
of, from, or like God or a god
[quote]therajraj wrote:
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
[quote]therajraj wrote:
Do you believe Jesus was divine?
[/quote]
That is actually an interesting question and not to dodge the question but it depends on what you mean by divinity. I believe he spoke truth.
I believe his human life had extra special value. hah.[/quote]
of, from, or like God or a god[/quote]
I believe all humans are both from and like God.
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
[quote]pat wrote:
[quote]therajraj wrote:
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
[quote]therajraj wrote:
Inalienable rights exist? Please demonstrate that they do.[/quote]
Says the guy who believes in the value of human life without the first inkling of a demonstration.[/quote]
So what? I already said I can’t. If he is asserting that inalienable rights exist and doesn’t just personally believe it, he must demonstrate that they do.
[/quote]
No, wait, I think DD has a point.
Why do you think human life has value? Isn’t it just another thing in the universe, no more or less important or valuable than anything else?[/quote]
You want to walk him in circles around this gaping hole in his belief structure a while? [/quote]
On the other hand, I do like rajraj. He debates decently which I respect. I disagree with him on lots of stuff, but decent he has been…
[quote]therajraj wrote:
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
[quote]therajraj wrote:
Do you believe Jesus was divine?
[/quote]
That is actually an interesting question and not to dodge the question but it depends on what you mean by divinity. I believe he spoke truth.
I believe his human life had extra special value. hah.[/quote]
of, from, or like God or a god[/quote]
I know you mean, consubstantial with God the Father, and yes I do. But there is no point in discussing that. Unless you believe in the existence of God, that conversation is pointless.
You have to believe that something exists, before you can discuss the nature of that thing, for that which does not exist, has no nature.
[quote]therajraj wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]therajraj wrote:
[quote]Sloth wrote:
[quote]Neuromancer wrote:
[quote]Sloth wrote:
Now, if the court finds against her, do you guys change your mind, end of controversy? She had no right to renewed contract after all? That’s it. Finished. Nothing more to say.[/quote]
Since I answered, will you change your mind if the court rules against the school?[/quote]
Nope. I perceive inalienable rights to be endowed by a creator.
[/quote]
So this schools admin has the inalienable right to run their school like a bunch of amateurs?[/quote]
I would look into schools run by the CC, the average cost per student and their overall administration costs and then…
bow my head in shame. [/quote]
Not really, I’m talking about this particular school not Catholic schools as a whole. Unless you’re saying wishy washy decision making has been the result of Catholic school success?[/quote]
Maybe?
What do I know?
I am just saying that they are vastly superior to public schools and I would not tamper with organizations that actually are able to deliver the goods.
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]therajraj wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]therajraj wrote:
[quote]Sloth wrote:
[quote]Neuromancer wrote:
[quote]Sloth wrote:
Now, if the court finds against her, do you guys change your mind, end of controversy? She had no right to renewed contract after all? That’s it. Finished. Nothing more to say.[/quote]
Since I answered, will you change your mind if the court rules against the school?[/quote]
Nope. I perceive inalienable rights to be endowed by a creator.
[/quote]
So this schools admin has the inalienable right to run their school like a bunch of amateurs?[/quote]
I would look into schools run by the CC, the average cost per student and their overall administration costs and then…
bow my head in shame. [/quote]
Not really, I’m talking about this particular school not Catholic schools as a whole. Unless you’re saying wishy washy decision making has been the result of Catholic school success?[/quote]
Maybe?
What do I know?
I am just saying that they are vastly superior to public schools and I would not tamper with organizations that actually are able to deliver the goods.
[/quote]
“The parents of none of the five children identified by Boland were informed of what had happened: indeed, Smyth continued to abuse two of those very children after the 1975 inquiry, and went on to rape and bugger a number of their younger siblings and cousins as well.”
[quote]Headhunter wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]therajraj wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]therajraj wrote:
[quote]Sloth wrote:
[quote]Neuromancer wrote:
[quote]Sloth wrote:
Now, if the court finds against her, do you guys change your mind, end of controversy? She had no right to renewed contract after all? That’s it. Finished. Nothing more to say.[/quote]
Since I answered, will you change your mind if the court rules against the school?[/quote]
Nope. I perceive inalienable rights to be endowed by a creator.
[/quote]
So this schools admin has the inalienable right to run their school like a bunch of amateurs?[/quote]
I would look into schools run by the CC, the average cost per student and their overall administration costs and then…
bow my head in shame. [/quote]
Not really, I’m talking about this particular school not Catholic schools as a whole. Unless you’re saying wishy washy decision making has been the result of Catholic school success?[/quote]
Maybe?
What do I know?
I am just saying that they are vastly superior to public schools and I would not tamper with organizations that actually are able to deliver the goods.
[/quote]
“The parents of none of the five children identified by Boland were informed of what had happened: indeed, Smyth continued to abuse two of those very children after the 1975 inquiry, and went on to rape and bugger a number of their younger siblings and cousins as well.”
Hate to tell ya, but your vocation has this issue 100 times worse. Down with teachers.
And I could’ve sworn, until recently, I had you on ignore (the conspiracy stuff, and alt accounts). Fixed.
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
[quote]therajraj wrote:
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
[quote]therajraj wrote:
Do you believe Jesus was divine?
[/quote]
That is actually an interesting question and not to dodge the question but it depends on what you mean by divinity. I believe he spoke truth.
I believe his human life had extra special value. hah.[/quote]
of, from, or like God or a god[/quote]
I believe all humans are both from and like God.[/quote]Here’s what he’s trying to ask you, but doesn’t know how. Do you believe that the man Jesus of Christianity fame was born of a virgin human woman, conceived by the Holy Spirit of the eternal one and only Father God and thereby God Himself manifested as a human being? The alone creator of heaven and earth, all things seen and unseen, including yourself? Uniquely so in all of the above and singular incarnate sovereign Lord in whom to this day dwells all the fullness of the Godhead bodily above or equal to there is absolutely no other?
I believe Raj was attempting to induce your yay or nay on some close version of what I just asked, but was simply not equipped to do so. Not that he should be. That is the historic Christian view of Jesus of Nazareth.
[quote]Sloth wrote:
And I could’ve sworn, until recently, I had you on ignore (the conspiracy stuff, and alt accounts). Fixed.[/quote]
Actually, on that note, it would be nice to have the ignore feature just remove the content of a users post instead of making the user invisible.
Not everyone quotes the person they are talking to, and that can become very confusing.
Actually, that’s probably why I don’t keep people on ignore for very long.
[quote]Makavali wrote:
[quote]Sloth wrote:
And I could’ve sworn, until recently, I had you on ignore (the conspiracy stuff, and alt accounts). Fixed.[/quote]
Actually, on that note, it would be nice to have the ignore feature just remove the content of a users post instead of making the user invisible.
Not everyone quotes the person they are talking to, and that can become very confusing.
Actually, that’s probably why I don’t keep people on ignore for very long.[/quote]
I see your having a conversation with another one of those conservatives that you’d have a beer with.
[quote]Makavali wrote:
[quote]Sloth wrote:
And I could’ve sworn, until recently, I had you on ignore (the conspiracy stuff, and alt accounts). Fixed.[/quote]
Actually, on that note, it would be nice to have the ignore feature just remove the content of a users post instead of making the user invisible.
Not everyone quotes the person they are talking to, and that can become very confusing.
Actually, that’s probably why I don’t keep people on ignore for very long.[/quote]
‘Ignore’ is rooted in a desire for ‘Ignorance’.
[quote]Sloth wrote:
[quote]Headhunter wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]therajraj wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]therajraj wrote:
[quote]Sloth wrote:
[quote]Neuromancer wrote:
[quote]Sloth wrote:
Now, if the court finds against her, do you guys change your mind, end of controversy? She had no right to renewed contract after all? That’s it. Finished. Nothing more to say.[/quote]
Since I answered, will you change your mind if the court rules against the school?[/quote]
Nope. I perceive inalienable rights to be endowed by a creator.
[/quote]
So this schools admin has the inalienable right to run their school like a bunch of amateurs?[/quote]
I would look into schools run by the CC, the average cost per student and their overall administration costs and then…
bow my head in shame. [/quote]
Not really, I’m talking about this particular school not Catholic schools as a whole. Unless you’re saying wishy washy decision making has been the result of Catholic school success?[/quote]
Maybe?
What do I know?
I am just saying that they are vastly superior to public schools and I would not tamper with organizations that actually are able to deliver the goods.
[/quote]
“The parents of none of the five children identified by Boland were informed of what had happened: indeed, Smyth continued to abuse two of those very children after the 1975 inquiry, and went on to rape and bugger a number of their younger siblings and cousins as well.”
Hate to tell ya, but your vocation has this issue 100 times worse. Down with teachers.
[/quote]
True dat…
She’s better off. If they fired her for wanting to have a baby, they’re fucking nuts anyway.
Buggering kids and firing good people because of some stupid shit from 1700 years ago…
[quote]Headhunter wrote:<<< ‘Ignore’ is rooted in a desire for ‘Ignorance’.[/quote]Honestly? I think the ignore thing is idiotic. I don’t ignore anybody because there is no person I preclude from the possibility of God teaching me something through. [quote]Headhunter wrote:She’s better off. If they fired her for wanting to have a baby, they’re fucking nuts anyway. Buggering kids and firing good people because of some stupid shit from 1700 years ago… [/quote]Mellow down man. It ain’t worth all this. Here you go gittin yerself all twitchy over some stupid people believing “stupid shit” that happened 1700 years ago. I keep hopin to see you in the epistemology thread demonstrating the truth of Spinoza’s god, but alas not yet. I don’t say that because I think you’re a dummy who can’t prove your views, but because like I always have, I think you’re a smart guy who can’t prove his views.
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]Makavali wrote:
[quote]Sloth wrote:
And I could’ve sworn, until recently, I had you on ignore (the conspiracy stuff, and alt accounts). Fixed.[/quote]
Actually, on that note, it would be nice to have the ignore feature just remove the content of a users post instead of making the user invisible.
Not everyone quotes the person they are talking to, and that can become very confusing.
Actually, that’s probably why I don’t keep people on ignore for very long.[/quote]
I see your having a conversation with another one of those conservatives that you’d have a beer with.
[/quote]
And I see you’re still trying to make yourself relevant.
[quote]Makavali wrote:
[quote]ZEB wrote:
[quote]Makavali wrote:
[quote]Sloth wrote:
And I could’ve sworn, until recently, I had you on ignore (the conspiracy stuff, and alt accounts). Fixed.[/quote]
Actually, on that note, it would be nice to have the ignore feature just remove the content of a users post instead of making the user invisible.
Not everyone quotes the person they are talking to, and that can become very confusing.
Actually, that’s probably why I don’t keep people on ignore for very long.[/quote]
I see your having a conversation with another one of those conservatives that you’d have a beer with.
[/quote]
And I see you’re still trying to make yourself relevant.
[/quote]
There you go flattering yourself again. No one, makes themselves relevant by talking to you. I was just reminding you of how chummy you thought you were with the other conservatives on this board. The fact is that most of them, like me, can’t stand you. That you never knew this is humorous. I guess you’ll have to move this into the column of things you thought you knew but were wrong about. That column will grow as you move along in life.
[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
[quote]Headhunter wrote:<<< ‘Ignore’ is rooted in a desire for ‘Ignorance’.[/quote]Honestly? I think the ignore thing is idiotic. I don’t ignore anybody because there is no person I preclude from the possibility of God teaching me something through. [quote]Headhunter wrote:She’s better off. If they fired her for wanting to have a baby, they’re fucking nuts anyway. Buggering kids and firing good people because of some stupid shit from 1700 years ago… [/quote]Mellow down man. It ain’t worth all this. Here you go gittin yerself all twitchy over some stupid people believing “stupid shit” that happened 1700 years ago. I keep hopin to see you in the epistemology thread demonstrating the truth of Spinoza’s god, but alas not yet. I don’t say that because I think you’re a dummy who can’t prove your views, but because like I always have, I think you’re a smart guy who can’t prove his views.
[/quote]
The truth is that he can’t prove his views because his views are based on illogical bigotry.
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
[quote]Headhunter wrote:<<< ‘Ignore’ is rooted in a desire for ‘Ignorance’.[/quote]Honestly? I think the ignore thing is idiotic. I don’t ignore anybody because there is no person I preclude from the possibility of God teaching me something through. [quote]Headhunter wrote:She’s better off. If they fired her for wanting to have a baby, they’re fucking nuts anyway. Buggering kids and firing good people because of some stupid shit from 1700 years ago… [/quote]Mellow down man. It ain’t worth all this. Here you go gittin yerself all twitchy over some stupid people believing “stupid shit” that happened 1700 years ago. I keep hopin to see you in the epistemology thread demonstrating the truth of Spinoza’s god, but alas not yet. I don’t say that because I think you’re a dummy who can’t prove your views, but because like I always have, I think you’re a smart guy who can’t prove his views.
[/quote]
The truth is that he can’t prove his views because his views are based on illogical bigotry.[/quote]
Wittgenstein was right.
All the stuff that Headhunter hears at the masses he is forced to attend = preposterous fantasy.
All the stuff he and NewBatman talk about ad nauseum regarding the Illuminati, etc. = perfectly plausible.