[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
Sloth wrote:
Anonymous Coward wrote:
pat wrote:
As a Catholic, you are obligated if not to do good, to at least do no harm.
I guess I can’t really argue with that. I don’t think that Catholicism requires you to be a one-issue voter, but if that’s on your conscience then I definitely can’t fault you for it.
During the last Canadian election, I didn’t have the option of voting for somebody who was against abortion, as all parties in my riding have either neutral or pro-abortion policies, which amount to the same thing when abortion is currently legal. The only thing most people I know can do to avoid voting for an abortionist is not vote, which probably affects my view on the issue.
Do you mean to say that you think is the only issue a Catholic can ethically vote on? How would you handle a situation where every available candidate had the same stance?
I guess I’m getting off-topic here, but the other point in my original post stands, that being that the priest was not ex-communicating anyone, as the article and several responses imply, he was letting them know that voting for Obama is a sin that needs confession and absolution.
Well, if you’re choosing between a pro-life yet pro unnecessary war candidate, and a pro-abortion anti unnecessary war candidate it could get complicated.
What would you consider an unnecessary war?[/quote]
Iraq. And the contiuation of our presence in Afghanistan.