I think that little Freudian slip is an excellent indicator of why you are repulsed by thoughts of being at the Mansion?!?
Not that there’s anything wrong with that.[/quote]
freudian slip? your insult skills are passe (grade F for lack of creativity)…this pathetic attempt at a put-down is feeble…
why are you so offended by my saying that Playboy = pure cheez?
it’s obvious that I have offended you and you’re hurt by my assessment of Playboy (why else would you feel the need to defend such a lame publication if you weren’t such an avid Playboy fan?)…
Hey Zap are these the same geeks that sit behind their computer all day replying to different threads agreeing with the frequent posters while spanking their monkey?
Sorry dude, had to do it. Still a little bothered by some of the stuff we were debating on Single Combat thread, haha.
AA
[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
You are right. Playboy is the lamest of the type.
If you want a skin mag there are many that are better/sexier.
If you want to read articles read something else.
I remember the geeks in college that actually collected Playboy. They never kissed a girl.[/quote]
[quote]Amsterdam Animal wrote:
Hey Zap are these the same geeks that sit behind their computer all day replying to different threads agreeing with the frequent posters while spanking their monkey?
Sorry dude, had to do it. Still a little bothered by some of the stuff we were debating on Single Combat thread, haha.
AA
Zap Branigan wrote:
You are right. Playboy is the lamest of the type.
If you want a skin mag there are many that are better/sexier.
If you want to read articles read something else.
I remember the geeks in college that actually collected Playboy. They never kissed a girl.
Man, one thing that I really love about rainjack is that he is never afraid to voice his opinion even if it goes against the popular opinion of the thread…no matter what…haha, I do agree with his sentiment though.
I think that little Freudian slip is an excellent indicator of why you are repulsed by thoughts of being at the Mansion?!?
Not that there’s anything wrong with that.[/quote]
Ummmm…looks like:
t-raven = took one course of psych in first year.
Jesus man…how can you possibly infer that much about a guy and his social/psychological situation from a few random posts on an internet forum???
Perhaps thy powers dwarf mine own…or you’re just trying to appear smarter than you are…whichever.
jesus H christ - you bunch of pussies. I dont care how cheezy it is, its a massion full of snatch and we have an insider going there. Lets be happy.[/quote]
I’d rather go to one of the local college bar hang-outs here (if I weren’t happily married)…the women are more attractive and less stupid…
but, I suppose if the insipid fake-tittied bimbo types are your personal preference then more power to you…
[quote]DPH wrote:
I’d rather go to one of the local college bar hang-outs here (if I weren’t happily married)…the women are more attractive and less stupid…[/quote]
Are you the guy that went to the U of W? I used to bounce at the Twist and at Sammy’s. I know what a lie the above statement is.
jesus H christ - you bunch of pussies. I dont care how cheezy it is, its a massion full of snatch and we have an insider going there. Lets be happy.
I’d rather go to one of the local college bar hang-outs here (if I weren’t happily married)…the women are more attractive and less stupid…
but, I suppose if the insipid fake-tittied bimbo types are your personal preference then more power to you…[/quote]
Thanks because they are.
In all seriousness it was meant light hearted. SG isnt going into hard core porn or anything. Big over reaction imo and although some peoples opinions were expressed tactfully - such as yours. Some were not.
[quote]Northcott wrote:
Are you the guy that went to the U of W? I used to bounce at the Twist and at Sammy’s. I know what a lie the above statement is.
[/quote]
well, I used to drink alot back then…they looked damn good with some hefty beer goggles on!
[quote]supermick wrote:
Thanks because they are.
[/quote]
no problems Mick…fake-tittied bimbo types are an important part (or should be) of every young man’s life…
[quote]
In all seriousness it was meant light hearted. SG isnt going into hard core porn or anything. Big over reaction imo and although some peoples opinions were expressed tactfully - such as yours. Some were not.[/quote]
in all seriousness, SG’s life in none of my business…
and most of the negative posts on this thread have been an enormous over-reaction to something that isn’t that big of a deal…
[quote]DPH wrote:
well, I used to drink alot back then…they looked damn good with some hefty beer goggles on![/quote]
Oh, they looked good! No doubt about that. DAMN but there were some insanely hot girls that used to come through… but Lord, were they stupid. Painfully so. Maybe not in class, but put them in a bar surrounded by males and with a beer in hand, and suddenly they were a group of hair-twirling, inanely giggling airheads.
[quote]Northcott wrote:
Oh, they looked good! No doubt about that. DAMN but there were some insanely hot girls that used to come through… but Lord, were they stupid. Painfully so. Maybe not in class, but put them in a bar surrounded by males and with a beer in hand, and suddenly they were a group of hair-twirling, inanely giggling airheads.
[/quote]
I remember well…the tried and true method of success…
intelligent attractive college girl + beer = insta-slut…
I tend to agree with DPH - Playboy is kinda sad these days. I respect what Heff was out to do in the beginning, but it’s fallen behind and become a child among the rest. I also agree about possible problems with employment as a cardiac surgeon. Not the issue here though…
As for candy… I’d pick something that doesn’t melt, like maybe the Sweet Tarts idea. The less licking involved the better; remember that not all the guys/gals there are gonna be the most savory types, better not to overcommit.
BTW, how’s your training going with your hectic schedule?
[quote]supermick wrote:
DPH wrote:
supermick wrote:
T men???
jesus H christ - you bunch of pussies. I dont care how cheezy it is, its a massion full of snatch and we have an insider going there. Lets be happy.
I’d rather go to one of the local college bar hang-outs here (if I weren’t happily married)…the women are more attractive and less stupid…
but, I suppose if the insipid fake-tittied bimbo types are your personal preference then more power to you…
Thanks because they are.
In all seriousness it was meant light hearted. SG isnt going into hard core porn or anything. Big over reaction imo and although some peoples opinions were expressed tactfully - such as yours. Some were not.[/quote]
Some failed to notice that many of the sweet suggestions (sorry…candy)were more to garner amusement from other male posters rather than to seem like fliratious remarks (however futile) to SG.
Maybe not in class, but put them in a bar surrounded by males and with a beer in hand, and suddenly they were a group of hair-twirling, inanely giggling airheads.