Candy

Off Topic
121

[quote]DPH wrote:
Playboy = pure cheezy shit

I didn’t even look at Playboy in college…the only people I ran across that read/‘beat off to’ Playboy (in college) have always been serious goof-balls that were lucky to ever get a date in their sad, stay at home by themselves on friday night, lives (there will be exceptions I’m sure)…

Playboy mag reminds me of the shy weirdo nut-jobs that would hang posters of scantily clad female celebrities on their dorm room walls (who were they trying to impress with that lame crap?)…those guys never got laid (but at least they had a stack of tame bland Playboy magazines hidden under their beds)…

if you want a whack mag, at least have the common sense to get Hustler…jeez…some wild crazed horned out college chick (aka attractive college girl with at least one beer in her) might even respect you for that…they’d probably just laugh at your Playboy collection…[/quote]

…i’ve never actually owned any porn mags or movies, but i’ve looked at quite a few…

…i’m right-handed, so as i turned the pages of the mag with my left, i couldn’t help but notice that playboy didn’t do much for me sexually. it’s a pretty classy mag, and i actually do enjoy reading it for the articles (case-in-point, the story “Guts” that Chuck Palahniuk submitted to playboy long before it was published in “Haunted”)…

…but, uh, if i was going to get caught with porn, i wouldn’t want her finding hustler. i don’t think she “might even respect [me] for that” if she found a magazine dedicated to women jamming twelve to eighteen inches of latex into various bodily openings. she’d probably respect (or at least understand) a playboy subscription first…

…unless she’s a freak. in which case, i want her to find my collection of surgical gloves and my digital camera…

love,
jason

122

[quote]supermick wrote:
are you demanding satisfaction?[/quote]

i don’t think i understand…

…no, i didn’t really want anything but to poke a little fun at someone…

…thus the smilie, dude…

…it’s a SMILIE. it stands for good-natured ribbing and requests for a good ol’ honarable duel…

…if only i could find a powdered wig…

love,
jason

123

[quote]Yeah, NEIL wrote:
supermick wrote:
are you demanding satisfaction?

i don’t think i understand…

…no, i didn’t really want anything but to poke a little fun at someone…

…thus the smilie, dude…

…it’s a SMILIE. it stands for good-natured ribbing and requests for a good ol’ honarable duel…

…if only i could find a powdered wig…

love,
jason[/quote]

"…consider this a slap to the face with my glove, t-raven…

…ten paces and draw, beeyatch!"

its customary to “demand satisfaction” whilst slapping your glove on said opponents face.

i assumed you were familiar with the practice.

Mick

124

[quote]Creidem wrote:
T-Raven wrote:
DPH wrote:

“all the goobers that I came across”

I think that little Freudian slip is an excellent indicator of why you are repulsed by thoughts of being at the Mansion?!?
Not that there’s anything wrong with that.

Ummmm…looks like:
t-raven = took one course of psych in first year.

Jesus man…how can you possibly infer that much about a guy and his social/psychological situation from a few random posts on an internet forum???

Perhaps thy powers dwarf mine own…or you’re just trying to appear smarter than you are…whichever.

C[/quote]

I think it was a joke.

125

[quote]Yeah, NEIL wrote:
supermick wrote:
are you demanding satisfaction?

i don’t think i understand…

…no, i didn’t really want anything but to poke a little fun at someone…

…thus the smilie, dude…

…it’s a SMILIE. it stands for good-natured ribbing and requests for a good ol’ honarable duel…

…if only i could find a powdered wig…

love,
jason[/quote]

Uhh–

I think he got it and was playing along.

Maybe you should reconsider the effectiveness of your ‘schooling.’

And the ‘love,jason’ has got to go.

126

[quote]sasquatch wrote:

And the ‘love,jason’ has got to go.

[/quote]

That’s right. Or else Michael2507 will be pissed.

127

Yeah SG did this thing on her blog on myspace…I guess its not gonna fly with some folks here eh?

It is attention grabbing IMHO.

And SG, why dont you accept my ADD on myspace!? goes to show ya…

128

[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
Creidem wrote:
T-Raven wrote:
DPH wrote:

“all the goobers that I came across”

I think that little Freudian slip is an excellent indicator of why you are repulsed by thoughts of being at the Mansion?!?
Not that there’s anything wrong with that.

Ummmm…looks like:
t-raven = took one course of psych in first year.

Jesus man…how can you possibly infer that much about a guy and his social/psychological situation from a few random posts on an internet forum???

Perhaps thy powers dwarf mine own…or you’re just trying to appear smarter than you are…whichever.

C

I think it was a joke.[/quote]

I know man…I just suck at typing sarcasm on internet forums!

Supermick…I was picking up what you were putting down with the demanding satisfaction…nice one.

For the record…I’d go to the mansion and pay my own damn way there just to say I went. I think it’d be a hell of a party. Doesn’t mean I have to get naked and dip it in the grotto…but I’m a pig so I probably would.

C

129

[quote]sasquatch wrote:
SouthernGirl wrote:
Gosh, who would have thought someone would get their panties in a wad over this issue here at Tmag?

5 hours at the playboy mansion will not jeopardize my entire medical career. Trust me.

I’ve never been the party type (just ask WguitarG, I domesticated him); this is just a great oppertunity I may never get again.

I don’t think I know the meaning of self esteem issues…guess they don’t cover that in school these days.

We all know here the only thing I care about in life is Carmen gracing me with her presence dripping with sarcasm…b/c matters regarding health, family and career are meaningless.

As tempting as it would be to elaborate on all the above issues, I really don’t have the time or the desire. It’s just not worth it. I have more important things to do…such as study the art of making those pity me since we all know my goals are so skewed.

Southerngirl = still not losing sleep.

more important things to do=
make and read and respond to self-aggrandizing, self-promoting threads that require me to wear lingerie and discuss Hef’s parties, dropping Carmen’s name and body painting.

Yah, no esteem issues here. [/quote]

Well said. Thank you!
Sophia

130

You guys are all funny. She’s going to be covered with body paint, which is art, right? Besides, I think they cover up the hoochie anyway with some duct tape or something. And it’s not like she’s going to be screwing all these guys - she’s just going to be sucking their dicks! I think it will be a good experience to see what goes on there.

DB

131

Damn. I don’t see this thread for a couple of days and it turns into this!

I’m sorry to see all the finger pointing and name calling occuring. I really don’t think it’s necessary to pass judgement on other’s lives and motivations, especially not as harshly as I’ve seen some do on this thread.

I respect you SG and am impressed with your dedication to your training, school, and pursuing your life goals. It’s rare that you meet someone with such drive and determination. I’m really glad that I’ve had the chance to get to know you, it’s had more of an impact on me than you know. Thanks for being you. :slight_smile:

132

[quote]sic wrote:
I really don’t think it’s necessary to pass judgement on other’s lives and motivations…
[/quote]

To me it seems like YOU are passing judgement too! :wink:

While I agree with where you’re coming from, I just thought I’d point out something that I’ve always noticed people who think passing judgement is bad do.
They pass judgement by judging everyone’s passing judgement! hehe, im just fuckin with ya, but seriously don’t pass judgement on other people, it’s wrong.

XD

133

Why not just setup a softcore porn site? You can post the same photos, writing about your vibrator, etc. and get paid for it. No sense doing anything half-assed and if you build up a little traffic to your site it makes getting to the playboy mansion all the easier.

134

[quote]Sepukku wrote:
sic wrote:
I really don’t think it’s necessary to pass judgement on other’s lives and motivations…

To me it seems like YOU are passing judgement too! :wink:

While I agree with where you’re coming from, I just thought I’d point out something that I’ve always noticed people who think passing judgement is bad do.
They pass judgement by judging everyone’s passing judgement! hehe, im just fuckin with ya, but seriously don’t pass judgement on other people, it’s wrong.

XD[/quote]

You’re a dork. :slight_smile: All I was trying to say was… just because it’s not your lifestyle or your way of doing things… it doesn’t mean that automatically makes everyone else wrong and you right. Give people a break and let them live their lives the way they chose. Let people make their own mistakes, ya know?

135

[quote]sic wrote:
Damn. I don’t see this thread for a couple of days and it turns into this!

I’m sorry to see all the finger pointing and name calling occuring. I really don’t think it’s necessary to pass judgement on other’s lives and motivations, especially not as harshly as I’ve seen some do on this thread.

I respect you SG and am impressed with your dedication to your training, school, and pursuing your life goals. It’s rare that you meet someone with such drive and determination. I’m really glad that I’ve had the chance to get to know you, it’s had more of an impact on me than you know. Thanks for being you. :)[/quote]

Wait a minute…that post was positive. I don’t think you’re allowed to do that in here. You must now repent by telling SG how utterly shallow you really think she is.

P.S. SG, despite all the pissing and moaning, I think what you’re doing sounds like a blast. Let people who are reading into all of the psychological reasons about why you posted this and/or why you’d even consider going to the Playboy Mansion (gasp!) do their own worrying about something that’s not even a big deal. It’s a night at the Mansion. You’re (maybe) going, they’re not. Simple as that.

The only thing I have to say is, as much as you like to post pictures, you better put up a whole album here from that night if you do end up going (though it would probably be more appropriate in the Sex and the Male Animal forum, as not to upset anybody). :slight_smile:

136

[quote]Sepukku wrote:
sic wrote:
I really don’t think it’s necessary to pass judgement on other’s lives and motivations…

To me it seems like YOU are passing judgement too! :wink:

While I agree with where you’re coming from, I just thought I’d point out something that I’ve always noticed people who think passing judgement is bad do.
They pass judgement by judging everyone’s passing judgement! hehe, im just fuckin with ya, but seriously don’t pass judgement on other people, it’s wrong.

XD[/quote]

I judge that you are judgemental.

137

[quote]Varqanir wrote:
sasquatch wrote:

And the ‘love,jason’ has got to go.

That’s right. Or else Michael2507 will be pissed.[/quote]

Oh, I’m sure we can find a civilized way to handle this. We won’t even need a wig, I believe…

xoxoxoxoxo The Man Behind The Mask xoxoxoxoxo

138

A CandyBarr.

I guess hardly anyone will grasp the pun and you probably won’t get to see Hef and Carmen, but at least it’s moderately funny and you’ll have a high anabolic index the whole evening.

By the way, am I the only one who thinks this thread took a turn similar to sic’s picture thread a while ago?

139

[quote]CC wrote:
sic wrote:
Damn. I don’t see this thread for a couple of days and it turns into this!

I’m sorry to see all the finger pointing and name calling occuring. I really don’t think it’s necessary to pass judgement on other’s lives and motivations, especially not as harshly as I’ve seen some do on this thread.

I respect you SG and am impressed with your dedication to your training, school, and pursuing your life goals. It’s rare that you meet someone with such drive and determination. I’m really glad that I’ve had the chance to get to know you, it’s had more of an impact on me than you know. Thanks for being you. :slight_smile:

Wait a minute…that post was positive. I don’t think you’re allowed to do that in here. You must now repent by telling SG how utterly shallow you really think she is.

P.S. SG, despite all the pissing and moaning, I think what you’re doing sounds like a blast. Let people who are reading into all of the psychological reasons about why you posted this and/or why you’d even consider going to the Playboy Mansion (gasp!) do their own worrying about something that’s not even a big deal. It’s a night at the Mansion. You’re (maybe) going, they’re not. Simple as that.

The only thing I have to say is, as much as you like to post pictures, you better put up a whole album here from that night if you do end up going (though it would probably be more appropriate in the Sex and the Male Animal forum, as not to upset anybody). :-)[/quote]

It isn’t about going to the mansion what sane testosterone driven male wouldn’t like to hear about that?

It’s about the pretentious, narcissistic, never-ending, quest for ego strokes and the inability to have any introspection on this.

“I’m the girl your boyfriends want to cheat on you with”

“What kind of candy would I be? tee hee hee,”

It’s really not a life and death issue but it is on a public forum and everybody will have an opinion.

140

[quote]sic wrote:
You’re a dork. :)[/quote]

Heheh Yep! 8)

[quote] All I was trying to say was… just because it’s not your lifestyle or your way of doing things… it doesn’t mean that automatically makes everyone else wrong and you right. Give people a break and let them live their lives the way they chose. Let people make their own mistakes, ya know?
[/quote]

I completely agree. Furthermore, in most cases people approach the situation in such a manner that if they really cared to change the actions of others with their better judgement, they would realise that they are going about it in completely the wrong way. In fact by being so abrasive and negative, they will most likely furhter root the person in their ways and encourage a defensive nature.

…So to me this suggests that either they are masters of reverse psychology and actually want the person to become even more set in their ways, or they are too stupid to see what they are achieving… or they just want to be abrasive and negative, which is also stupid!

Instead of getting the person to support their mode of ideals, they would rather achieve the opposite, just because they feel more compelled to attack!

And all the while what I say may be true, but I am doing exactly what I am advocating against! Merely because I think Im oh so very clever, and that I feel the need to share it with the world, as opposed to effecting any positive change!

0_o