[quote]HolyMacaroni wrote:
[quote]Hyena wrote:
I would have to disagree with you, I have a H&K USP .45 compact, it has a 4 inch barrel, and it is more accurate, at greater range, than my Springfield 1911 with a 5.5 inch barrel.
[/quote]
unless you have pictures where you have placed the gun in a vice, used same ammo, and have pictures of the target, i will choose not to believe you.
while very general: given no other variables, a longer barrel will = greater accuracy.
[quote]Hyena wrote:
Probably not gonna be the case 100% of the time, but a full size is not ALWAYS better, even for home defense.[/quote]
the fact that you had to begin your argue with the possibility of being wrong just reaffirms my previous statement.
larger guns carry more ammo, have a longer barrel, allow for a better grip, and will handle recoil better.[/quote]
I didn’t say that because there was a chance I was wrong, I said it because there are exceptions to the rule. Yes, typically, a larger gun is more accurate, carries more ammo, blah blah blah, but there are some large frame guns that are not as good as some compacts.
out of both my semi handguns, my USP carries more ammo, is more accurate, exponentially easier to clean, more ergonomic, and overall just more functional than my 1911. this would be a case where a compact is better than a full size. The USP was more expensive, but only because it was the compact model. A full size USP .45 costs the same as the 1911, and I think anybody would be absolutely insane to pick the 1911 over the USP.