[quote]pushharder wrote:
[quote]spiderman739 wrote:
Fox hunting in it’s current form does not predate the Romans. The first recorded fox hunts with hounds was in the 16th Century as a means of pest control.
A lot of opposition is class based. It is mainly practiced by the upper middle class that live in the countryside.
As for it being a part of British culture, it is hardly a major part. I was born and raised in England and lived there until I was 21. I never went on a hunt, never saw a hunt, never knew anyone that went on a hunt, and never knew anyone that ever saw one.
I have no problems with hunting in general. One guy with a gun/rifle/bow against an animal that he has tracked an followed seems like a pretty fair fight to me. Foxing hunting, in my opinion is different. It’s a pack of hounds, a load of people on horses, and loads of follower on foot. Against a fox. Doesn’t seem to be in keeping with the spirit of hunting to be honest.
[/quote]
And that’s your subjective opinion. You’re entitled to it. Don’t hunt foxes.
Someone else, they rich or poor, might have a different one.
So you do your thing; they do theirs. Why do the folks that don’t like it want to stop the ones that do? The ones that do surely don’t try to enforce that you take up the sport. Why must those like you insist they cease?[/quote]
I agree with you to be honest. I don’t care enough about it to want to see it banned. I guess I just don’t get the attraction. And the whole “tradition” argument could be applied to so many different things that I don’t consider in valid.
As I said, I don’t hunt. However, I can understand the appeal. Fox hunting just doesn’t look to me to have the same challenge that one would get from hunting in the conventional sense.
To all those that are against the banning of fox hunting, do you do any form of hunting? Would any of you be interested in trying it? And if so, for what reasons?